›

The 007 Timeline Discussion thread

barryt007barryt007
edited November 2016 in Bond Movies Posts: 19,339
As we are once again derailing the BOND 25 thread and are going to get told off if we carry on,i have created this thread for timeline discussion .

Chat,argue,discuss ....
«134

Comments

  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    Only one timeline exists.
    Craig is pre Connery that's all.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Timeline discussion...

    DN-->DAD
    CR-->Ongoing

    Unofficial three universes:
    Casino Royale (1954)
    Casino Royale (1967)
    Never Say Never Again (1983)
  • tanaka123tanaka123
    Posts: 4,325
    BondJasonBond006 wrote: »
    Only one timeline exists.
    Craig is pre Connery that's all.

    But Craig was in GoldenEye the remake videogame ...

  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    BondJasonBond006 wrote: »
    Only one timeline exists.
    Craig is pre Connery that's all.

    But Craig was in GoldenEye the remake videogame ...
    Haha! Not to mention, the entire 007 Legends saga that took place before Skyfall. :))
  • tanaka123tanaka123
    Posts: 4,325
    Casino Royale (1953)-Spectre (2015); Bond 25 possibly in development.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    One shebang of a timeline, @tanaka123. ;)
  • tanaka123tanaka123
    edited November 2016 Posts: 4,325
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    One shebang of a timeline, @tanaka123. ;)

    It's being one shish kebab shebang of a thing this whole James Bond thing from 1953 to the present day,

    actually I should have put Casino Royale (1953)-Unnamed Anthony Horowitz Bond novel (2018) - with everything in between, back and forth across the 1950s to the present day and back, and Forward and Back again to Bond's first mission and on again with the reintroduction of Blofeld. It's one continous, ever-changing, anamorphic, literary inducing, cinemascope enveloping, surround sound inducing heck of a ride.
  • barryt007barryt007
    edited November 2016 Posts: 19,339
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    Timeline discussion...

    DN-->DAD
    CR-->Ongoing

    Spot on,thats how I see it...members have to try to avoid the dates the films were made,that only confuses the issue IMO.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    BondJasonBond006 wrote: »
    Only one timeline exists.
    Craig is pre Connery that's all.

    But Craig was in GoldenEye the remake videogame ...

    which proves my point really, if Craig is in GE then he is in all other Bonds too.
    As I said only one timeline exists.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    One shebang of a timeline, @tanaka123. ;)

    It's being one shish kebab shebang of a thing this whole James Bond thing from 1953 to the present day,

    actually I should have put Casino Royale (1953)-Unnamed Anthony Horowitz Bond novel (2018) - with everything in between, back and forth across the 1950s to the present day and back, and Forward and Back again to Bond's first mission and on again with the reintroduction of Blofeld. It's one continous, ever-changing, anamorphic, literary inducing, cinemascope enveloping, surround sound inducing heck of a ride.
    In a nutshell of a shebang of an answer, that's the only explanation... ;)

    Well, to some but me and a few others, like @barryt007 for instance.
  • tanaka123tanaka123
    Posts: 4,325
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    One shebang of a timeline, @tanaka123. ;)

    It's being one shish kebab shebang of a thing this whole James Bond thing from 1953 to the present day,

    actually I should have put Casino Royale (1953)-Unnamed Anthony Horowitz Bond novel (2018) - with everything in between, back and forth across the 1950s to the present day and back, and Forward and Back again to Bond's first mission and on again with the reintroduction of Blofeld. It's one continous, ever-changing, anamorphic, literary inducing, cinemascope enveloping, surround sound inducing heck of a ride.
    In a nutshell of a shebang of an answer, that's the only explanation... ;)

    Well, to some but me and a few others, like @barryt007 for instance.

    Yes, some would call it the Bond cannon, but I call it the Bond Shebang.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    Timeline 1 (1962 to 1985) (Original Bond)
    Timeline 2 (1987 to 2002) (Younger Bond) TLD starts off with a training mission so it gives off a slight rebooted feel.
    Timeline 3 (2006 -)
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    Timeline 1:

    1962 to 2015:

    Craig
    Connery
    Lazenby
    Moore
    Dalton
    Brosnan

    it's so obvious really, and as continuity never played a role in the series, this is the proper timeline to watch the films.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Sorry, it doesn't add up. Not even in the slightest. For all we know, it's a fan theory as good as "James Bond" being a codename.
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    I HATE that bloody 'codename' crap...i want to slap anyone who believes in it...THEY are not real Bond fans...
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    barryt007 wrote: »
    I HATE that bloody 'codename' crap...i want to slap anyone who believes in it...THEY are not real Bond fans...
    My point exactly, @barryt007. ;)
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    Never heard of that codename rubbish before coming on this forum.
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    Oh its been around a while as more and more actors became Bond.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    Those people probably believe Bruce Wayne is a codename too :P
  • AlexanderWaverlyAlexanderWaverly
    Posts: 2,115
    In 1995, at the NYC James Bond convention, Michael G. Wilson said the Bond series wasn't a single entity but rather a "series of series."

    First time that I recall anyone associated with the series of series said that.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,591
    BondJasonBond006 wrote: »
    Never heard of that codename rubbish before coming on this forum.
    Oh, I have.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    They said whatever they said but never openly stated that Brosnan's series was branched out from the others, did they?

    Daniel Craig's Bond was the only Bond to be rebooted and reintroduced. So, officially, it remains two timelines. Unofficially? They never told us anything and probably went along with what they officially said. The rest is just public talk.

    Oh, and what about the theory where James Bond is a Time Lord?
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    oh c'mon, seriously @ClarkDevlin :))

    Don't you know Agent James Bond really belongs to Section 31 and has only travelled back in time to prevent some sinister plots of villains, the temporal police chose him for the job as Agent Sloan can't be trusted anymore.
  • barryt007barryt007
    edited November 2016 Posts: 19,339
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    They said whatever they said but never openly stated that Brosnan's series was branched out from the others, did they?

    Daniel Craig's Bond was the only Bond to be rebooted and reintroduced. So, officially, it remains two timelines. Unofficially? They never told us anything and probably went along with what they officially said. The rest is just public talk.

    Oh, and what about the theory where James Bond is a Time Lord?

    Blimey you are on form today @ClarkDevlin ...i dont need to say anything ,you are saying all my thoughts for me ...3rd time today hahaha !!

  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    @BondJasonBond006, at least that proves @DisneyBond007's theory right... James Bond fighting Martians! :))

    @barryt007, what can I say, mate? Commonsense Strikes Again! :D
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    But Bond did fight Nazi Martian's once!
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    God help us all.
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    hahaha ive never seen that ,and with Sir Roger as Bond as well...brilliant !!
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    Nobody does it better. ;)
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    Damn right !
Sign In or Register to comment.