New interview with Logan

tqbtqb
edited November 2011 in Skyfall Posts: 1,022
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/joshw24/news/?a=50098

http://collider.com/john-logan-james-bond-skyfall-interview/127574/


"Logan talked about how he first came aboard the project, his approach to scripting a film that’s part of a 50-year franchise, the process of crafting the series’ notorious action set-pieces with the aid of Mendes, and how he weaves action into the story. Hit the jump to read the full interview.

Mendes and Logan have known each other for years, so when the director asked Logan to come aboard the project he jumped at the chance:

“[Mendes] said there’s this great script by Purvis and Wade that existed, but he wanted me to come onboard and I did the ultimate thing you never do which is I said ‘Yes. I don’t care what you pay me, I don’t care what I have to do, yes,’ because I grew up—the first Bond movie I ever saw was Diamonds are Forever, I remember every moment of it.”

While it’s been said that Skyfall will be a standalone film in the series instead of a direct sequel like Quantum of Solace, Logan sees the pic a bit differently:

“It has nothing to do with being a standalone film, as far as I’m concerned, because I don’t think these films are standalone, I think they’re part of a legacy. When I was working on it I was deeply aware as much of Quantum of Solace and Casino Royale as I was of Thunderball, as I was of Ian Fleming in the 50’s writing it, you know you’re a float in a parade.”

That being said, Logan didn’t feel devoutly deferent to the series as he had a great sense of freedom when drafting the screenplay:

“What was particularly thrilling about this is the freedom, because I had the fear that you would going into a franchise movie that you have to put all the toys back in the sandbox, but I’ve never felt anything but completely free as a writer to explore different material, to explore different ideas with these characters and this world. It’s been amongst the best experiences I’ve ever had on a movie.”

Finally, when asked about how he approaches the action set-pieces in the film, Logan said that it’s an extremely collaborative process with Mendes extensively involved, though the action is always in service to the story:

“It’s a very collaborative process, and Sam is front and center on everything. He’s got an amazingly exciting adventure mind, which not all filmmakers do…The important thing for me is making sure that the action belongs in that movie, cause there’s such a thing as a Bond kind of action, and then there’s a subset of that which is our Skyfall kind of action, they all have their own definitions.”

They’re currently two weeks deep into production and the plot is being kept under lock and key, but I’m definitely enticed not only by the involvement of Logan and Mendes, but also the fantastic cast that they’ve put together. We’ll find out for certain if Skyfall delivers next November.

Here’s the part of Steve’s video interview with Logan on Bond followed by the transcript. Look for their full conversation soon."
«13

Comments

  • cant you post the entire article cannot open it
  • tqbtqb
    Posts: 1,022
    updated ^
  • Posts: 4,619
    Great interview! Logan sounds much more enthusiastic than Paul Haggis ever did.
  • Posts: 1,894
    Paul Haggis never sounds enthusiastic. Not unless you get him to talk about Hollywood liberalism.
  • edited November 2011 Posts: 11,119
    AHA! John Logan: <i>"It has <b>nothing</b> to do with being a standalone film, as far as I’m concerned, because I don’t think these films are standalone, I think they’re part of a legacy. When I was working on it I was deeply aware as much of Quantum of Solace and Casino Royale as I was of <b>Thunderball</b>."</i>

    I think John Logan is one hell of a Bond-nerd, and THAT'S GOOD ;). Hail Johnny Logan!
  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    Posts: 4,399
    wow Gustav... you're just grasping at straws now.... or, more like cherry picking his statement...

    if you really break down what he said - it more less translates to, he doesn't view each one as stand alone - it's all part of the legacy - or they are all connected in some way, and aren't by themselves, or separated from the pack... and while writing, he is constantly aware of where the series is at currently with the previous 2 films, as well as where it's been and where it was...

    nice try though.... keep digging for those copyright transcripts ;)
  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    edited November 2011 Posts: 4,399
    double post
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    edited November 2011 Posts: 14,584
    The cryptic message is quite obvious.

    It has nothing to do with being a standalone film, as far as I’m concerned, because I don’t think these films are standalone, I think they’re part of a legacy."

    :-O
  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    Posts: 4,399
    BLIND CC!! BLIND CC!!
  • HASEROT wrote:
    wow Gustav... you're just grasping at straws now.... or, more like cherry picking his statement...

    if you really break down what he said - it more less translates to, he doesn't view each one as stand alone - it's all part of the legacy - or they are all connected in some way, and aren't by themselves, or separated from the pack... and while writing, he is constantly aware of where the series is at currently with the previous 2 films, as well as where it's been and where it was...

    nice try though.... keep digging for those copyright transcripts ;)

    If you read carefully, I didn't say anything basically. I just highlighted a quote from John Logan. So I do not understand why I am 'grasping at straws'. And to be honest, isn't it infectious to see a nerdy screenplay writer like John Logan working on 'Skyfall'? I actually like it. I can recall an interview with Michael G. Wilson from 1999, released shortly after TWINE. In that interview he admitted: "You actually have to be a fanatic, a nerd, to create the uttermost best Bond film."
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,355
    John Logan being a real fan is some of the best news we could get. With him and Mendes, this one will rock our socks off.
  • Posts: 9,847
    am i the only one who is hoping the early bond 24 rumor of the script being written by Logan Purvis Wade is true?

    from this interview alone I want Logan to return for bond 24 :D
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,355
    If he's as bigger fan as it looks it makes sense for him to be involved with Bond 24 and to have been asked back. This could also mean a quick turnaround for the next film, ie. 2014. Suddenly, the future seems rather bright.
  • Posts: 9,847
    Agreed Samuel I'm hoping for Mendes to return as well but I doubt it we'll see I'm sure this time next year bond 24 rumors will be much more :D
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,355
    Mendes has not said no and as stated at the conference, if he's loving it as much when Skyfall has finished filming, he'd return. With Mendes we have the best chance of a returning director since Glen.
  • Posts: 1,497
    tqb wrote:
    the first Bond movie I ever saw was Diamonds are Forever, I remember every moment of it.”

    This is my kind of writer!

    :D
  • Posts: 1,548
    JBFan626 wrote:
    tqb wrote:
    the first Bond movie I ever saw was Diamonds are Forever, I remember every moment of it.”


    This is my kind of writer!

    :D

    As long as his script hasn't been inspired by DAF! The second worst in the offical series behind AVTAK. We don't want another cross -dressing villain or cartoon sheriffs!

  • Posts: 12,526
    i think we have a winning combination of writer and director now. Just looking at the cast for this film? Assuming Mendes and Logan return with another quality script? Which actors could be attracted to the franchise in future?
  • SharkShark Banned
    edited November 2011 Posts: 348
    LeChiffre wrote:
    JBFan626 wrote:
    tqb wrote:
    the first Bond movie I ever saw was Diamonds are Forever, I remember every moment of it.”


    This is my kind of writer!

    :D

    As long as his script hasn't been inspired by DAF! The second worst in the offical series behind AVTAK.

    Oh look! Another fanboy with a sense of humour bypass.

    DAF is a marvelously entertaining farce, with some wittiest dialogue in the series courtesy of Tom Mankiewicz.

    "I didn't know there was a pool down there..."
    LeChiffre wrote:
    We don't want another cross -dressing villain or cartoon sheriffs!

    I'd rather that than watch some pouting albino ape run through walls, suck fingers, and his best possible pick-up line being "I can't find the stationary."
  • edited November 2011 Posts: 4,619
    Shark wrote:
    Oh look! Another fanboy with a sense of humour bypass.

    Just like Ace Ventura: When Nature Calls, DAF is a funny movie but that doesn't make it a good movie.

    If you expect SF or any future Bond film to be like DAF, you're in for a huge disappointment. Just saying...
  • Posts: 1,548
    Shark wrote:
    LeChiffre wrote:
    JBFan626 wrote:
    tqb wrote:
    the first Bond movie I ever saw was Diamonds are Forever, I remember every moment of it.”


    This is my kind of writer!

    :D

    As long as his script hasn't been inspired by DAF! The second worst in the offical series behind AVTAK.

    Oh look! Another fanboy with a sense of humour bypass.

    DAF is a marvelously entertaining farce, with some wittiest dialogue in the series courtesy of Tom Mankiewicz.

    "I didn't know there was a pool down there..."
    LeChiffre wrote:
    We don't want another cross -dressing villain or cartoon sheriffs!

    I'd rather that than watch some pouting albino ape run through walls, suck fingers, and his best possible pick-up line being "I can't find the stationary."

    Humour alone does not make a good Bond Movie. At least DC is the closest interpretation to Fleming's Bond than all others, including, gasp, Mr Connery. Bond after all is a killer not a comedian!

  • SharkShark Banned
    edited November 2011 Posts: 348
    LeChiffre wrote:
    Humour alone does not make a good Bond Movie.

    Not alone no, but it's an important part of the equation. Lose it (like with QOS and a majority of CR) and the film suffers.
    LeChiffre wrote:
    DC is the closest interpretation to Fleming's Bond than all others.

    I'd say Lazenby, Dalton, Connery, Moore on occasion and even Brosnan in DAD came closer. Bond is a man of extremely refined tastes, world weary (he often reflects on the meaning of life, death and good vs. evil), and kills only when has to, but is not some superhuman killing machine (i.e. Red Grant or Craig's Bond). Fleming's Bond is not a jug eared thug in a tux, a sociopath or an assassin. He's a relic of the British Empire.
    LeChiffre wrote:
    Bond after all is a killer not a comedian!

    He's a killer with a sense of humour.

    "Speak up now or forever hold your piece."
  • SharkShark Banned
    Posts: 348
    Shark wrote:
    Oh look! Another fanboy with a sense of humour bypass.

    DAF is a funny movie but that doesn't make it a good movie.

    It does. It is a good movie, because it's humour works. A great movie? Nah, but decent.
    If you expect SF or any future Bond film to be like DAF, you're in for a huge disappointment. Just saying...

    Hopefully John Logan can prove you wrong.
  • Posts: 4,619
    Shark wrote:
    Hopefully John Logan can prove you wrong.

    I'm pretty sure Logan wrote an amazing screenplay and I'm also pretty sure it's nothing like DAF.
  • SharkShark Banned
    Posts: 348
    Shark wrote:
    Hopefully John Logan can prove you wrong.

    I'm pretty sure Logan wrote an amazing screenplay and I'm also pretty sure it's nothing like DAF.

    Then it isn't amazing.
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    edited November 2011 Posts: 15,718
    I agree with Shark that DAF is probably the greatest script in the entire series. It's just a fantastic script, one of the most quotable Bond film. And I also agree that Moore in TMWTGG was closer to Fleming's Bond than Craig in either his movies.
  • Posts: 161
    I have a feeling the both of you will never enjoy another Bond film. Oh well..
  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    edited November 2011 Posts: 4,399
    If you read carefully, I didn't say anything basically. I just highlighted a quote from John Logan. So I do not understand why I am 'grasping at straws'. And to be honest, isn't it infectious to see a nerdy screenplay writer like John Logan working on 'Skyfall'? I actually like it. I can recall an interview with Michael G. Wilson from 1999, released shortly after TWINE. In that interview he admitted: "You actually have to be a fanatic, a nerd, to create the uttermost best Bond film."

    don't play dumb with me sir.....

    you were the one making a big deal about Blofeld returning.. and your little "AHA!" comment again gave you out that you were trying to prove that point - unless of course you had an 80s flashback which i highly doubt...

    Blofeld isn't returning - let me say that again, so it can sink in a little...

    Blofeld...

    Who's rights still belong to McClory's estate...

    ...which means they cannot be used without consent or purchase, upon threat of legal rammifcations..

    ...IS NOT COMING BACK!

    the end

  • HASEROT wrote:
    If you read carefully, I didn't say anything basically. I just highlighted a quote from John Logan. So I do not understand why I am 'grasping at straws'. And to be honest, isn't it infectious to see a nerdy screenplay writer like John Logan working on 'Skyfall'? I actually like it. I can recall an interview with Michael G. Wilson from 1999, released shortly after TWINE. In that interview he admitted: "You actually have to be a fanatic, a nerd, to create the uttermost best Bond film."

    don't play dumb with me sir.....

    you were the one making a big deal about Blofeld returning.. and your little "AHA!" comment again gave you out that you were trying to prove that point - unless of course you had an 80s flashback which i highly doubt...

    Blofeld isn't returning - let me say that again, so it can sink in a little...

    Blofeld...

    Who's rights still belong to McClory's estate...

    ...which means they cannot be used without consent or purchase, upon threat of legal rammifcations..

    ...IS NOT COMING BACK!

    the end

    First of all: You are wrong about the rights EON have. According to my post in here, http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/comment/48009#Comment_48009 , EON officially possesses now rights to ALL Bond and Fleming related characters. I suggest you read this post carefully.

    Secondly, don't call me....sir. I am a normal bloke. And there is no reason to patronize me like that.

  • Posts: 1,548
    I agree with Shark that DAF is probably the greatest script in the entire series. It's just a fantastic script, one of the most quotable Bond film. And I also agree that Moore in TMWTGG was closer to Fleming's Bond than Craig in either his movies.


    Sorry, just split my sides laughing. I accept your dislike for Mr Craig (totally disagree but each to their own) but to say that DAF is the greatest script is surely inviting ridicule.

Sign In or Register to comment.