It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Was octopussy shot in your city? That must have been really cool if it was. That would be the coolest thing to have Bond come to your backyard sort to say.
No i live in Kolkata, OP was shot at Udaipur. Different City different state still Beautiful city.
As a bond fan yes that was really cool to see bond film shot in my country.
Ok India looks so beautiful that's one place EON should return same with Egypt they should return there too.
Damn, you should have visited to Kolkata @Getafix it's a metropolitan city and far better in terms of facilities and lots places for foreigners to visit. Still two places that you should visit "Bhawal National Park" and "Limestone lake,netrokana" in Dhaka. Both are breathtaking.
Wish we could have met, haven't met any forum members yet, although it would be difficult for me to come there at the moment as it is still a different country. How long will you be in Dhaka?
PTS of SF was supposed to be shot in India but due to some inconvenience that didn't happened. As much as I want to, it would be an heck of issue for the crew to shoot here, but things have changed quite a lot since 2011.
Still there is hope but even if they shoot in India it won't be the main location like OP & every other bond film had before. Now that I come to think of it Craig era didn't really had much main location, the way it used to serve it's purpose in terms of narration.
CR had Montenegro
QOS had Bolivia
SF had London
SP should have been Morocco instead it was again London.
Seems it was me that caused the stir.
Now let's move past this, and continue the more important task of sorting out whether Blofeld says "Him", or "You".
Sorry, can't understand what you're trying to say here.
EDIT: Thanks :D
Any member of MI6 is most welcome here :) .
I'll take you up on that offer some day ;) Maybe i can combine it with a Udaipur visit as that is high on my list as well.
It is indeed a great line.
What could be problematic with it is the rehashing of the theme of Bond not longer being needed, and him having to prove himself again. Another indication of this could be the 'world has moved on, commander' line.
I hope these are just lines though, and they won't be exploring the theme any further.
Definitely :D
Already left. In Dubai now. I've been to Kolkata a couple of times. Like it a lot.
Let me know when you visit next time here, will arrange a meet, enjoy Dubai ;)
Yeah I completely agree, I think that thread of has run it's course. I was wincing initially when I heard that "the world has moved on" line. I thought we were done with that after Spectre. It just feels odd looking back when Daniel was brought on in 2006 he was a "rookie" 00, gets his license to kill and since Quantum he's been over the hill and no longer relevant. It does become tiring
I think we have to read his tenure as
1. He is promoted to 00 status in his mid to late 30s.
2. '00s have a very short life expectancy' so no one expects many years out of him at this level.
3. By his mid 40s he has already outlived most 00s and at that age he is already slightly over the hill. So, even if he has only done a couple of useful assignments he is already nearer the end than the beginning when we arrive at SF.
4. In SP he is back to his best, but retires anyway. As any 00 surely would.
I do wish we would have got a film in between QOS and SF, just one film to show Bond at his best. Without the whole "I need to know I can trust you" and is "MI6 relevant" storyline (although that worked very well in Skyfall)
It's only a minor gripe admittedly, sorry to derail the thread
Bond is 39 in SF, if we assume the film was set in 2012.
Bond was 12 when Hannes took him, and it was in 1985.
I don't think they would go that far.
Umm
1983.
Funny, the same year OCTOPUSSY came out.
I was thinking the same thing.