It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
The facial hair was for his role in the play The Tempest which closed at the end of October. This is how he looked like last week:
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm284996352/nm0000146
I know all of the character roles are secretive at this point, but given the excessive secrecy of his, plus the few little tidbits we're given, I find it hard to believe he's just any random character they made up.
For your eyes only. X_X
I'm betting you are dead right. Fiennes has the right vibe for a Mi6 top brass official. I can imagine Dench's M being suspended while her past activities are investigated and Fiennes takes control of Mi6.
First of all. I always try to make a distinction between gossip (Bad newspapers and tabloids that are talking crap) and slip of the tongues from people that are actually working on the damn project (John Logan, David Arnold, you know them.
So with that in mind, you can actually predict which rumour will come true and which rumour will stay bullocks. I know that I was the first on the MI6 Forums who announced that 'Quantum Of Solace' actually would be the next Bond title, while at the same time many people thought that would be bullocks.
Now about the role of 'M'. I am also anticipating that Judi Dench will leave after 'Skyfall'. You know why? Because during the press conference she did not directly give a hint, but she indirectly hinted to that possibility. Not to mention the plot synopsis of 'Skyfall' that is known so far.
But Ralph Fiennes playing the new 'M'? I doubt it. It means that we keep seeing an unbelievable twat heading MI6 Bond film after Bond film. One that keeps compromising the entire secrecy of MI6. No, I think Fiennes deserves a better, more compelling character to play. Because 'M' is still a secondary type of role. Necessary, but <b>usually</b> for the importance of the actual plot not that much.
And frankly, I think Ralph Fiennes must have been lured into the Bond franchise, by actually offering him a role that could also outshine James Bond himself. Something that is risky, but that could actually work 200%. That's why I keep returning to the possibility that Fiennes actually could play a villain that many people already know of, but that will be completely renewed/revamped/rebooted to today's political circus.
So call me weird, but I pay attention :-*
Interesting theory I must say. I would like Vallance as a cinematic character. One of the few recurring characters from the books that never made it into the film series.
I'd rather see Holly Vallance!
http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/462/should-ronnie-vallance-be-introduced-into-the-series
Free feel to add more of your thoughts here, Dimi.
I never would have even thought of that, but it is absolutely brilliant! Fiennes would be perfect in such a role.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15856477
States he is cast as the villain???!
Fiennes not replacing Dench as "M"? Wana make a bet on that?
Fiennes is not the type of actor I see signing on for 3+ movies -in such a rather small role (traditionally), thus I do not believe he is M.
And you can see him as a Mathis-like ally?
Could you see Dame Judi Dench signing on for 3+ movies before 1995?
Nope, didn't say that. He is an extremely "dynamic character". He's going to be a large character in the film. Not a Mathis, not a M, not a Q. Government official, fellow agent, something only specific to one (SKYFALL's) storyline.
Great idea! Who knows? A character only the Bond-readers would recognize would suit the laconic answer given by Mendes at the press conference.