NO TIME TO DIE (2021) - First Reactions vs. Current Reactions

1154155157159160298

Comments

  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    Posts: 3,154
    Nail. Head.
  • Posts: 131
    AstonLotus wrote: »
    I think Craig had more chemistry with Ana De Armas in 10 minutes than he had with Seydoux in two movies.

    It has been said before, but yes, totally.
  • Which is doubly ironic because they didn’t even film most of their scenes together since Craig was out with an injury for most of the Cuba shoot lol.
    I do think Madeline was much better used in NTTD than Spectre though and I found their relationship felt a lot more natural than it did.
  • Posts: 131
    It is indeed ironic, but was likely due to the good rapport DC and Ana De Armas had from filming Knives Out.
    If Bond and Madeline were a real life couple, their relationship may have been a workable one, but IMO their scenes together lacked the screen magnetism of Bond and Paloma.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,979
    I really love this movie. It's stuck in my head even more now after that second viewing. Crazy how familiar and recognizable it already is for me after only two viewings; I feel like I can replay most of it in my head already.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Stamper wrote: »
    A Safe room! Add some kind of holo-projections to make it seem he is outside. It's not too far fetched for Bond, especially if they want to bring back the fantasy elements. Also, there are always cure for nanobots as some posters pointed out. We will see in Bond 26.

    This film has been very clearly marketed as the end of Craig’s tenure. Both he and Fukunaga have noted that there could be no room for misinterpretation, the death would be a ‘fact’. Hence they have him consumed by explosions. Right there on screen in front of us. If they’d wanted to leave it open that would have been incredibly easy to do. But they didn’t. It couldn’t be more definitive.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    RC7 wrote: »
    Stamper wrote: »
    A Safe room! Add some kind of holo-projections to make it seem he is outside. It's not too far fetched for Bond, especially if they want to bring back the fantasy elements. Also, there are always cure for nanobots as some posters pointed out. We will see in Bond 26.

    This film has been very clearly marketed as the end of Craig’s tenure. Both he and Fukunaga have noted that there could be no room for misinterpretation, the death would be a ‘fact’. Hence they have him consumed by explosions. Right there on screen in front of us. If they’d wanted to leave it open that would have been incredibly easy to do. But they didn’t. It couldn’t be more definitive.

    They could have shown his cracked head over here, a torn leg over there and so on
  • Posts: 1,394
    I wonder when did Craig’s Bond lose his kryptonian super powers? At the start of Skyfall he gets very badly shot and a few seconds later he’s fixing his cuffs,in NTTD he actually looks like he’s suffering from those gunshot wounds.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    RC7 wrote: »
    Stamper wrote: »
    A Safe room! Add some kind of holo-projections to make it seem he is outside. It's not too far fetched for Bond, especially if they want to bring back the fantasy elements. Also, there are always cure for nanobots as some posters pointed out. We will see in Bond 26.

    This film has been very clearly marketed as the end of Craig’s tenure. Both he and Fukunaga have noted that there could be no room for misinterpretation, the death would be a ‘fact’. Hence they have him consumed by explosions. Right there on screen in front of us. If they’d wanted to leave it open that would have been incredibly easy to do. But they didn’t. It couldn’t be more definitive.

    They could have shown his cracked head over here, a torn leg over there and so on

    raiders-of-the-lost-ark-face-melt-gif-8.gif
  • edited October 2021 Posts: 3,327
    AstonLotus wrote: »
    I wonder when did Craig’s Bond lose his kryptonian super powers? At the start of Skyfall he gets very badly shot and a few seconds later he’s fixing his cuffs,in NTTD he actually looks like he’s suffering from those gunshot wounds.

    This is one of NTTD's massive plus points for me. When Bond is almost blown up he goes temporarily deaf, when he is then shot at in the PTS he looks puzzled before reacting, with the shootout scenes at the end of Safin's island, the action unfolds from Craig's perspective.

    This felt very Fleming, and its the first time we have seen this type of action unfold like this is a Bond movie. If Cary returns to direct another one, I'd be more than happy.

    My gripe has always been mainly with the script, not the production itself.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    RC7 wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    Stamper wrote: »
    A Safe room! Add some kind of holo-projections to make it seem he is outside. It's not too far fetched for Bond, especially if they want to bring back the fantasy elements. Also, there are always cure for nanobots as some posters pointed out. We will see in Bond 26.

    This film has been very clearly marketed as the end of Craig’s tenure. Both he and Fukunaga have noted that there could be no room for misinterpretation, the death would be a ‘fact’. Hence they have him consumed by explosions. Right there on screen in front of us. If they’d wanted to leave it open that would have been incredibly easy to do. But they didn’t. It couldn’t be more definitive.

    They could have shown his cracked head over here, a torn leg over there and so on

    raiders-of-the-lost-ark-face-melt-gif-8.gif

    And M could drive the point home with another OHMSS reference, quipping "He had a lot of guts!"
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    edited October 2021 Posts: 3,154
    AstonLotus wrote: »
    I wonder when did Craig’s Bond lose his kryptonian super powers? At the start of Skyfall he gets very badly shot and a few seconds later he’s fixing his cuffs, in NTTD he actually looks like he’s suffering from those gunshot wounds.
    Same reason Craig said it took him 12 months to get into shape for NTTD while it took only three months to do it for CR - he's been out of the game for five years at an age where T-levels and muscle mass decline rapidly. Eh? No, no, no - of course, Bond's raging testosterone levels cushioned the impact of the bullet in SF! What else could it be? Ahem.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    edited October 2021 Posts: 8,188
    AstonLotus wrote: »
    And again,he just knew Vesper for only a few weeks at best and it was years ago! Get over it dude!

    Bond was still visiting Vesper’s grave annually in the books, as stated in OHMSS.

    Get over it Fleming!
  • MinionMinion Don't Hassle the Bond
    Posts: 1,165
    AstonLotus wrote: »
    And again,he just knew Vesper for only a few weeks at best and it was years ago! Get over it dude!

    Bond was still visiting Vesper’s grave annually in the books, as stated in OHMSS.

    Get over it Fleming!
    Fleming’s such a bonehead! I’d have Bond doing chicks ON Vesper’s grave while downing Four Lokos!
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,188
    I think Purvis & Wade likely wrote in that Bond visits Vesper’s grave annually, which is why Blofeld set up a bomb as he anticipated another visit. However, rewrites made it that this was Bond visiting her grave for the first time.
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    edited October 2021 Posts: 3,154
    Barbara Broccoli said of Vesper, 'in Bond lore, she is the most important character because she affects his life forever.' There's a clue there.
  • edited October 2021 Posts: 2,918
    Just wanna give a shout out to @Revelator for taking the time of pouring out all those well articulated thoughts on NTTD.
    @Revelator:
    Your comment was a great read. I started out wanting to quote the passages I agreed with, but soon realised I would end up quoting it in its entirety, especially starting from the points re: Tanner and Felix. I wish I could have put my thoughts as eloquently and comprehensively as you did, but your review perfectly sums up my admittedly more jumbled thoughts.

    ETA The only point where I differ with you is not regarding NTTD, but Skyfall, which I see as being the best directed and, arguably, the most stylish among the Craig installments.
    Excellent piece @Revelator
    One of the best and in depth critiques I've read about NTTD.
    Lots of stuff in there that I was possibly thinking, but could never articulate as well as this.

    Thanks everyone! I was a bit worried about posting such a long and eccentric take on the film, and it's a relief to find it well received. I can also see why Skyfall might be regarded as a more stylish and better-directed film. For me Fukunaga and Lindgren have the edge but I remember how relieved I was to see Skyfall and realize that Deakins and Mendes were delivering sparkling images.

  • Draco20Draco20 USA
    Posts: 18
    I recently saw NTTD and I really enjoyed it. There was no other way for Craig to end. I always liked Madeline Swan from SPECTRE and was glad to see her just sex up every scene she was in. She looks so good in her clothes.

    As for the haters who whine about how a beloved franchise has been ruined. I tell them to get over themselves. The Bond franchise has been going for almost 6 decades because of the way they constantly have to reboot re define itself and adapt to changing times
    thats IMO
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    edited October 2021 Posts: 13,978
    AstonLotus wrote: »
    This is easily the best,most well balanced ( He really likes Craig as Bond ) ,and funniest review of the film yet...


    From the guy who whined about Cardi B’s song and embarrassed himself for not understanding female anatomy? Lmao, no thanks.

    Remember that interview with Andrew Neil (for Americans who don’t know him, a Tory so conservative he recently left the BBC to join a rival Fox news style channel) where he started telling him he was just a liberal? Amazing. Frames his whole brand around being this rational and reasonable king of debate, then gets so flustered when faced with a proper journalist he resorts to just screaming and calling him a lefty liberal, when that couldn’t be further from the truth.

    Yeah, I’m not going to watch his review, but I feel confident in saying it’s definitely not the best, most balanced or funniest. I’ll stick to Mark Kermode, thanks. But I do like Ben Shapiro. Seeing how mental American politics is always makes me feel slightly better about the sad state of all that in the UK. It reminds me that things could be even worse.

    I don't know enough about Shapiro to attac or defend him, but if he left the PaedBC then he can't be all bad, right?
  • SeveSeve The island of Lemoy
    Posts: 426
    RC7 wrote: »
    Stamper wrote: »
    A Safe room! Add some kind of holo-projections to make it seem he is outside. It's not too far fetched for Bond, especially if they want to bring back the fantasy elements. Also, there are always cure for nanobots as some posters pointed out. We will see in Bond 26.

    This film has been very clearly marketed as the end of Craig’s tenure. Both he and Fukunaga have noted that there could be no room for misinterpretation, the death would be a ‘fact’. Hence they have him consumed by explosions. Right there on screen in front of us. If they’d wanted to leave it open that would have been incredibly easy to do. But they didn’t. It couldn’t be more definitive.

    Lol, of course it could, they could have left out...

    "James Bond Will Return"

    Which makes it confusing for anyone who is not a "fanboy" (or "fangirl")

    hqdefault.jpg


    frame_0002.jpg



  • matt_umatt_u better known as Mr. Roark
    edited October 2021 Posts: 4,343
    FROM THE JAMES BOND ARCHIVES NTTD EDITION:

    Michael G. Wilson In March 2017, we started developing a script with Neal Purvis and Robert Wade where Bond continues his relationship with Madeleine Swann. It also featured a toxin that targets people based on their DNA, so it was essentially an untraceable assassin. When Danny Boyle came on board as director in early 2018 he wrote a new treatment with John Hodge. We liked the emotionality of it. Their idea was that Bond had a relationship in the past - not with Madeleine - and he finds out he has a child. The idea of Bond having a child has been mooted before - a daughter was in an early Spectre script. We liked the tone of the Hodge/Boyle treatment, but as it developed it started to veer further and further away from the original story.
    Danny is a fantastic filmaker, but we both realized we wanted to make different movies, so we parted on friendly terms in August 2018.


    So basically Boyle's "gold idea" was that Bond has a daughter from a previous relationship before being 007 and before Vesper.
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    edited October 2021 Posts: 5,970
    Interesting @matt_u, does make you wonder how that would have lined up with all the sequences we can gather together from the concept art shared recently by Tim Browning? And the rumours regarding Bond being captured for most of the story?

    https://www.krop.com/timbrowning/#/
  • Posts: 12,476
    Very interesting. Clearly the Bond having a child idea was something the producers liked for a long time, and honestly I’m surprised Boyle had that in his script too. I hope we get more of his script ideas soon.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 6,306
    QoS also was pitched to feature Vesper's child and M's death...so both of these ideas were destined to happen under Craig.
  • edited October 2021 Posts: 49
    AstonLotus wrote: »
    Did Bond really need a love interest after Vesper? The answer seems to be a hard no. The Casino Royale storyline proves that she was the love of his life, because he never seemed to get over her. Not even in the scene during NTTD at the grave (I don’t think he was sincere in letting go). It was extremely unbelievable that he would go for another long term relationship again (knowing his reputation as we do). Even in Casino he was not predisposed to relationships, as he only had flings with married women. So, how do we go from that to Madeline deal in Spectre and NTTD? Makes no sense to me. It felt forced, contrived, unnatural and goofy.

    Agreed.What doesn’t help is that I don’t get anywhere near the same chemistry between Bond and Madeline that Bond and Vesper did.I think Craig had more chemistry with Ana De Armas in 10 minutes than he had with Seadoux in two movies.

    And again,he just knew Vesper for only a few weeks at best and it was years ago! Get over it dude!

    This comparison between Ana and Lea gets to the nub of the type of Bond Film people do and do not want.

    Those who think Ana had more chemistry must be defining chemistry as pizazz, overt energy, humour and a lightness of touch and in Bond terms full of quips.

    From the moment Lea appears on film there is nuance, atmosphere, subtly, ambiguity and you never know quite know what Lea is thinking, feeling except when she has to be decisive or is reacting to a crisis which is beautifully drawn back into her child hood through the recall of the incident she describes to Bond on the train in Spectre. The point about ambiguity in her playing is not original it was something Daniel said when he was asked two years ago about her qualities.

    The scenes with Ana are fun entertaining counterpoint and a throw back to the type of mid period portrayals of woman in Bond Lite movies. The scenes with Lea are angst ridden loaded with implication and motive and give NTTD a richness of texture and an additional depth which before Daniel we only see fleetingly with Timothy. Pierce wanted to do his "stuff" in "The World is Not Enough" and Judy and Sophie were capable of elements off that but those were island moments within the old formula.

    On the question of knowing Vesper for only a few weeks, relationships can be a lifetime of experiences in a month and offer years of reflection.


  • Posts: 12,476
    That “secret idea” Craig talked about wanting to do for so long had to be either having the daughter or him dying I would imagine.
  • matt_umatt_u better known as Mr. Roark
    edited October 2021 Posts: 4,343
    FoxRox wrote: »
    That “secret idea” Craig talked about wanting to do for so long had to be either having the daughter or him dying I would imagine.

    Killing off Bond comes down even from CR. Again from the Archives:

    Gregg Wilson There were three core elements from the original Purvis and Wade script that we wanted to keep. Since Bond retires at the end of Spectre we liked the idea of introducing a new 007; she’s competitive with Bond and represents the new guard at MI6. Secondly, the DNA-targeted poison was the core idea fr the threat. And lastly, we wanted a satisfying way for Bond to sacrifice himself at the end.

    Daniel Craig When I started as Bond on Casino Royale, one of the early discussions I had with Barbara and Michael was that I would like to kill off Bond when I finished.

    Barbara Broccoli We had considered killing Bond in Spectre, but decided against it.


    So guys, if you hate the idea, Daniel is the one to blame. :D
  • edited October 2021 Posts: 526
    Hopefully, depending on who the Bond is for 26, we can get back to James Bond the assassin and missions. No necessarily world-savers, but basic action packed thrillers. No more serial-based garbage please. And less focus on side characters. The name of the franchise is James Bond, no? And while some say a lighter tone, I don’t believe this would be good for the character. Craig did a lot to get it away from the slapstick stuff of Moore, Brosnan, Austin Powers, I.e. Do we really want to go back to that? Having Bond seen as a joke parodied all about. Make him even colder, and more relentless. Let the romance stuff take a good long deserved vacation. Craig’s Bond made way more $ portraying a colder Bond, and that’s what works (look at the BO). I’d also say keep these movies to around 2 hours unless you can make them like Casino. It’s easy for a movie to become bloated and lose people’s attention. And their money. And for God’s sake no more family stuff ever again, please!
  • Posts: 12,476
    Well, I’m glad it waited until after SP, seeing as IMO we got a much better final film with NTTD! I hated the idea at first, and while I still wouldn’t say I’m a “fan,” it doesn’t bother me once I considered how Fleming basically originally killed Bond too. It’s not as sacrilegious as I first thought.
  • Posts: 526
    matt_u wrote: »
    FoxRox wrote: »
    That “secret idea” Craig talked about wanting to do for so long had to be either having the daughter or him dying I would imagine.

    Killing off Bond comes down even from CR. Again from the Archives:

    Gregg Wilson There were three core elements from the original Purvis and Wade script that we wanted to keep. Since Bond retires at the end of Spectre we liked the idea of introducing a new 007; she’s competitive with Bond and represents the new guard at MI6. Secondly, the DNA-targeted poison was the core idea fr the threat. And lastly, we wanted a satisfying way for Bond to sacrifice himself at the end.

    Daniel Craig When I started as Bond on Casino Royale, one of the early discussions I had with Barbara and Michael was that I would like to kill off Bond when I finished.

    Barbara Broccoli We had considered killing Bond in Spectre, but decided against it.


    So guys, if you hate the idea, Daniel is the one to blame. :D

    I can’t believe he wanted that. But there it is. All I can say is: I wish he’d quit after Spectre.
Sign In or Register to comment.