It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Great article though- if only he did more films!!
Top 3 Bonds
1. Sean on pedestal 2. Laz 3. Rog.
The rest meh.
Lazenby is quite simply brilliant to watch, his physicality and his positioning in scenes is very good.
I also love his delivery in the scene immediately after the avalanche, he is very effective in what he says and how he says it. I think the the film as a whole has a problem with dubbing and at times editing of dialogue scenes which let old Georgey boy down at times. A few more beats here and there in the cutting room between lines and it would have been perfection.
On a final note I love the way Lazenby does at times sound more like the man off the street as opposed to polished Oscar grabber, kind of makes it all the more accessible and with an ending like OHMSS it was vital that it happened that way.
George - Gone but not forgotten by a long shot.
Given how good Laz was in certain scenes (and how wooden in others) he certainly picked up "that acting thing" very quickly and very well. I think he would have given a great performance in a second film.
I agree completely with you about how Laz's Bond was far more accessible to the audience. Rereading the Fleming books (I'm now halfway through GF) really makes me appreciate how Fleming's Bond is very much a "regular guy" and light-years removed from the super-smooth hyper-confident versions that we've seen such as with Moore. Setting aside any preference for allegience to the books (I have no problem with the Movie Bond and the Book Bond being different because, well, they are different mediums) it's an interesting idea that a more accessible Bond could make people in the audience identify and sympathise with him more.
To be that humble is awesome when your talking about probably THE cinematic role of all time. OHMSS is a superb film which i really do like. And also has one of the best soundtracks of the franchise without question! Barry's masterstroke alongside Goldfinger.
Nice article. Many thanks.
And of course a cracking score:
Only because he wasn't very memorable.
The answer? I can't remember the exact numbers but it was very close to this..
Connery 94
Moore 75
Brosnan and Craig tied 58
Dalton 38
Lazenby 30
I was amazed by how many actually did remember Lazenby and by how many failed to mention either Brosnan or Craig, the two most recent Bonds.
As for Bond it was never seen as a major acting challange so style and appearance won Lazenby the role, but I do know what you mean @identigraph it was a big gamble to take even at a time when Bond was in such a position of strength (ie no major action franchise in competition).
You're right in saying George's agent was an ass for persuading him to leave the Bond role after one appearance, damn pity in retrospect, and with it, the disaster of the next release, and Tracy all but forgotten and Blofeld makes a mess of it, with some stupid laser satellite plot, but what's to be done now ? We can't change what occured, but I'll always give Lazenby some level of support, or encouragement, as I did think he gave us a good Bond performance and while was always going to come a poor second to Sean Connery, I just feel he did a more than adequate job of it