It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Why am I not surprised that you found that out? Could it be that this IS somewhat close to your "neck of the woods"? :-)
You see the two buildings in my Street View image on the left hand of this screenshot (thank you, screenmusings!):
A movie location.
We also have such a shot from above when Bond tells M that Slate was a "dead end"
Good luck in finding the next one!
That's it already. In fact, I thought this is the spot where the Boat drives over but after checking more of my pictures, I realized that this spot is around 100 metres before the corner where the two policemen are getting wet. (It would be very odd if there would be found a car for real...there isn't much space and definitely no place for parking) The boat then drives in this direction:
We don't really go in for that any more.
Good one, @zebrafish and @goldenswissroyale! I just tried to find the actual weir in your swan picture and I suppose it is this?
No swans, though. Did EoN place them there for the filming, like the car on the embankment? Oh, wait - your image wasn't a screenshot from the film, I guess, so forget this.
Yeah, I read the NYT article, too. They probably punish a few impeccable characters by removing their names as well, I guess. American Ornithological Society - now there's a real mouthful.
I suppose they had to place the boat there right after the "obstacle" (maybe by crane??). And then the they could speed up right to the corner with the police men.
You've got a point there, at least regarding the sweeping renaming of all species referring to a person. Still I think that it's a disgrace that an animal is called Anophthalmus hitleri, and even the lowliest animal deserves better. However, "[w]hile many have suggested the species be renamed, the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature's principle of priority holds that the first name validly given to a species is its correct name and does not in general allow for a name to be invalidated due to causing offense."
(See Wikipedia for "Anophthalmus hitleri").
"Since 1886, the AOS and its predecessor, the American Ornithologists’ Union (AOU), have maintained a list of official English-language names for birds in North America (and more recently, South America). These names are widely used – but also often updated when new science comes to light, says the organization. Scientific names will not be changed."
Example: The North-American duck Clangula hyemalis was called "Oldsquaw", which in 2000 was changed to "Long-tailed duck".
Some scientific names are actually quite funny: In 2017, researchers named a moth Neopalpa donaldtrumpi because it had pale blond head scales and small genitalia.
I fear this could be more difficult than usual, but I am ready to give hints along the way.
location
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.0751552,-73.7703758,3a,51.3y,211h,94.74t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1siw3vTFlWautCGVp2w_Ijww!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu