Would you rather watch CR 67 OR NSNA?

1117118120122123152

Comments

  • Posts: 12,479
    mtm wrote: »
    meshypushy wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    meshypushy wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    @Scaramanga1974
    In what way is OP racist?
    I actually happened to watch OP in the last week (not prompted by this thread) - the only thing that stood out to me was Bond’s comment ‘that should keep you in curry for a few weeks’ after winning at the casino.

    So yes, that's poking fun at a minor aspect of what many in the West associate with Indian culture. I don't see that as discriminatory or deliberately offensive, though. Look, I don't want to be "that guy", I'm just troubled by accusations of racism, which is a very serious thing. We have become very careful when zooming in on specific parts of someone else's culture for shits and giggles, recognizing the possibility of coming off as insensitive and whatnot. And it's a good thing that we have. But in my humble opinion there's a huge gap between emphasizing unfortunate stereotypes and being blatantly racist. The latter implies that you're treating people as inferior, that you're excluding them from the freedoms we should all share, merely on the basis of their culture or ethnicity.

    Films often use stereotypes as narrative shorthand; OP is no exception. India is a fairly exotic destination for 007. The film emphasizes that by exaggerating the obvious differences between the Western world and this beautiful part of Asia. OP also makes Americans look a bit silly, Russians almost savage, and women mere objects of lust. But is TLD any better in that regard? Afghan people look like warring sages (apart from the one that received an Oxford education…), Americans are gun-worshipping capitalists, chesty women are an obvious distraction, and so on. Surely, most of this didn’t bother us when we were a lot younger. Such stereotypes often helped us to understand what was going on.

    All I’m saying is – and apologies for going so lengthy here – that while I recognize the insensitivities of OP, I don’t think it’s racist, let alone more racist than TLD (or most other Bond films, for that matter.)
    Agreed - no Bond movie offends me in the slightest. I understand that people have issues with aspects of the older movies (up to SF, apparently) but Bond is inherently a bastard and all art is a product of its time. Different times and all that.

    This is true. I think LALD or the aforementioned Temple of Doom are more racist than Octopussy; they don't offend me per se as they are products of their time, but as we have all the people saying this stuff shouldn't be edited etc. as we 'should learn from it', then I think part of that learning means that you have be comfortable with calling it out as such.
    FoxRox wrote: »
    I personally prefer AVTAK, but I understand why OP is generally preferred. The latter is more consistent, but the good things about AVTAK like the music and Walken and May Day really elevate it for me. It’s got its issues, but it’s got some really fun highs for me that OP didn’t have. All just taste anyway! Both are fun experiences but not close to my top tier.

    Well that is a reasonable point of view as AVTAK is the greatest movie ever made. It's not even subjective.

    Hey, there are literally thousands of worse choices for a greatest movie ever made! :P
  • CommanderRossCommanderRoss The bottom of a pitch lake in Eastern Trinidad, place called La Brea
    Posts: 8,269
    mtm wrote: »
    meshypushy wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    meshypushy wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    @Scaramanga1974
    In what way is OP racist?
    I actually happened to watch OP in the last week (not prompted by this thread) - the only thing that stood out to me was Bond’s comment ‘that should keep you in curry for a few weeks’ after winning at the casino.

    So yes, that's poking fun at a minor aspect of what many in the West associate with Indian culture. I don't see that as discriminatory or deliberately offensive, though. Look, I don't want to be "that guy", I'm just troubled by accusations of racism, which is a very serious thing. We have become very careful when zooming in on specific parts of someone else's culture for shits and giggles, recognizing the possibility of coming off as insensitive and whatnot. And it's a good thing that we have. But in my humble opinion there's a huge gap between emphasizing unfortunate stereotypes and being blatantly racist. The latter implies that you're treating people as inferior, that you're excluding them from the freedoms we should all share, merely on the basis of their culture or ethnicity.

    Films often use stereotypes as narrative shorthand; OP is no exception. India is a fairly exotic destination for 007. The film emphasizes that by exaggerating the obvious differences between the Western world and this beautiful part of Asia. OP also makes Americans look a bit silly, Russians almost savage, and women mere objects of lust. But is TLD any better in that regard? Afghan people look like warring sages (apart from the one that received an Oxford education…), Americans are gun-worshipping capitalists, chesty women are an obvious distraction, and so on. Surely, most of this didn’t bother us when we were a lot younger. Such stereotypes often helped us to understand what was going on.

    All I’m saying is – and apologies for going so lengthy here – that while I recognize the insensitivities of OP, I don’t think it’s racist, let alone more racist than TLD (or most other Bond films, for that matter.)
    Agreed - no Bond movie offends me in the slightest. I understand that people have issues with aspects of the older movies (up to SF, apparently) but Bond is inherently a bastard and all art is a product of its time. Different times and all that.

    This is true. I think LALD or the aforementioned Temple of Doom are more racist than Octopussy; they don't offend me per se as they are products of their time, but as we have all the people saying this stuff shouldn't be edited etc. as we 'should learn from it', then I think part of that learning means that you have be comfortable with calling it out as such.

    No they're not:
    Racism is discrimination and prejudice against people based on their race or ethnicity.
    Making a stereotype isn't racist unless you do it to show that the one you're making a stereotype off is inferior to you.
    And curry isn't only associated with India in the West, Indians themselves find it part of their culture. Would I be 'discriminated' if somebody made a remark about me and cheese as a Dutchman? No, it's part of my culture. Try @DartDimi and beer. You won't upset him in the slightest.

    Let's keep the word racism for what it really means.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited July 14 Posts: 16,431
    mtm wrote: »
    meshypushy wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    meshypushy wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    @Scaramanga1974
    In what way is OP racist?
    I actually happened to watch OP in the last week (not prompted by this thread) - the only thing that stood out to me was Bond’s comment ‘that should keep you in curry for a few weeks’ after winning at the casino.

    So yes, that's poking fun at a minor aspect of what many in the West associate with Indian culture. I don't see that as discriminatory or deliberately offensive, though. Look, I don't want to be "that guy", I'm just troubled by accusations of racism, which is a very serious thing. We have become very careful when zooming in on specific parts of someone else's culture for shits and giggles, recognizing the possibility of coming off as insensitive and whatnot. And it's a good thing that we have. But in my humble opinion there's a huge gap between emphasizing unfortunate stereotypes and being blatantly racist. The latter implies that you're treating people as inferior, that you're excluding them from the freedoms we should all share, merely on the basis of their culture or ethnicity.

    Films often use stereotypes as narrative shorthand; OP is no exception. India is a fairly exotic destination for 007. The film emphasizes that by exaggerating the obvious differences between the Western world and this beautiful part of Asia. OP also makes Americans look a bit silly, Russians almost savage, and women mere objects of lust. But is TLD any better in that regard? Afghan people look like warring sages (apart from the one that received an Oxford education…), Americans are gun-worshipping capitalists, chesty women are an obvious distraction, and so on. Surely, most of this didn’t bother us when we were a lot younger. Such stereotypes often helped us to understand what was going on.

    All I’m saying is – and apologies for going so lengthy here – that while I recognize the insensitivities of OP, I don’t think it’s racist, let alone more racist than TLD (or most other Bond films, for that matter.)
    Agreed - no Bond movie offends me in the slightest. I understand that people have issues with aspects of the older movies (up to SF, apparently) but Bond is inherently a bastard and all art is a product of its time. Different times and all that.

    This is true. I think LALD or the aforementioned Temple of Doom are more racist than Octopussy; they don't offend me per se as they are products of their time, but as we have all the people saying this stuff shouldn't be edited etc. as we 'should learn from it', then I think part of that learning means that you have be comfortable with calling it out as such.

    No they're not:
    Racism is discrimination and prejudice against people based on their race or ethnicity.
    Making a stereotype isn't racist unless you do it to show that the one you're making a stereotype off is inferior to you.

    Of course they are. In LALD the idea is basically presented at least the first half of the film that all black people are working together secretly against 'us'. Cab drivers, funeral processions, the entire clientele and staff of every bar you go in etc. ... it's a dodgy message the film portrays there. If you watch it with that in mind it's all a bit rum. Yes, there's Quarrel and Cutter, but they're in it so briefly as to not really balance it out.
    And before kneejerking to the film's defence just because we're all 007 fans; just consider it for a moment. Can it be seen that way? There's a strange message which is basically against an entire race there.
    And curry isn't only associated with India in the West, Indians themselves find it part of their culture. Would I be 'discriminated' if somebody made a remark about me and cheese as a Dutchman? No, it's part of my culture. Try @DartDimi and beer. You won't upset him in the slightest.

    Goodness me you're stretching here. Just admit it's a dodgy joke, it's fine to. And if you don't think it's dodgy, please don't try and use it in a similar situation for your own sake.
    I'm English, and if someone from another country I'd not met before made jokes about me drinking tea all the time ho-ho-ho, then honestly I would initially suspect them of being a dick and eventually get pissed off with them. If I were from a minority background (which is where the racism comes in) then I suspect it would be another drop in the tank of feeling that other folk can't get over the colour of my skin.

    I love Bond films, but if we can't accept where time has moved on for some bits of them then I think we're just being unrealistic. If someone was to say that these parts were all going to be removed in future releases of these films then what would folks say? Be honest: just like with the Fleming fuss it would be 'we need to keep these as a reminder of how we went wrong and that we can learn from them' etc. That's what they say every time. So we have to admit these are moments we have moved on from. And if folks can't then maybe they should be cut out.
  • Connery's treatment of women doesn't bother me and these supposed "racist" moments don't bother me either. I find it ironic that some fans of James Bond, the embodiment and icon of masculinity, are triggered by masculine traits?

    Some people just like to create drama out of nothing.
  • Posts: 4,174
    mtm wrote: »
    meshypushy wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    meshypushy wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    @Scaramanga1974
    In what way is OP racist?
    I actually happened to watch OP in the last week (not prompted by this thread) - the only thing that stood out to me was Bond’s comment ‘that should keep you in curry for a few weeks’ after winning at the casino.

    So yes, that's poking fun at a minor aspect of what many in the West associate with Indian culture. I don't see that as discriminatory or deliberately offensive, though. Look, I don't want to be "that guy", I'm just troubled by accusations of racism, which is a very serious thing. We have become very careful when zooming in on specific parts of someone else's culture for shits and giggles, recognizing the possibility of coming off as insensitive and whatnot. And it's a good thing that we have. But in my humble opinion there's a huge gap between emphasizing unfortunate stereotypes and being blatantly racist. The latter implies that you're treating people as inferior, that you're excluding them from the freedoms we should all share, merely on the basis of their culture or ethnicity.

    Films often use stereotypes as narrative shorthand; OP is no exception. India is a fairly exotic destination for 007. The film emphasizes that by exaggerating the obvious differences between the Western world and this beautiful part of Asia. OP also makes Americans look a bit silly, Russians almost savage, and women mere objects of lust. But is TLD any better in that regard? Afghan people look like warring sages (apart from the one that received an Oxford education…), Americans are gun-worshipping capitalists, chesty women are an obvious distraction, and so on. Surely, most of this didn’t bother us when we were a lot younger. Such stereotypes often helped us to understand what was going on.

    All I’m saying is – and apologies for going so lengthy here – that while I recognize the insensitivities of OP, I don’t think it’s racist, let alone more racist than TLD (or most other Bond films, for that matter.)
    Agreed - no Bond movie offends me in the slightest. I understand that people have issues with aspects of the older movies (up to SF, apparently) but Bond is inherently a bastard and all art is a product of its time. Different times and all that.

    This is true. I think LALD or the aforementioned Temple of Doom are more racist than Octopussy; they don't offend me per se as they are products of their time, but as we have all the people saying this stuff shouldn't be edited etc. as we 'should learn from it', then I think part of that learning means that you have be comfortable with calling it out as such.

    No they're not:
    Racism is discrimination and prejudice against people based on their race or ethnicity.
    Making a stereotype isn't racist unless you do it to show that the one you're making a stereotype off is inferior to you.
    And curry isn't only associated with India in the West, Indians themselves find it part of their culture. Would I be 'discriminated' if somebody made a remark about me and cheese as a Dutchman? No, it's part of my culture. Try @DartDimi and beer. You won't upset him in the slightest.

    Let's keep the word racism for what it really means.

    Well, stereotypes can still be racist, and that inferiority element isn't always clear cut.

    The curry line in OP does stick out to be fair. It's noticeably a bit weird/cringey especially when seen today, and has that racial/cultural bias as a line. I don't think a comment about cheese/a Dutchman has quite the same connotation given that it's directed at an Indian, and one who is in this case subservient to Bond in a relatively stereotypical way (for better or for worse). It's kind of similar to the moment in DN where Bond barks at Quarrel to fetch his shoes. I'm sure there's stuff in that nowadays we'd find slightly uncomfortable that weren't as apparent to many at the time. Honestly though, there's much worse you can find in films, and Bond as a series isn't bad for these sorts of things. It's a lame line as well.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited July 14 Posts: 16,431
    Connery's treatment of women doesn't bother me and these supposed "racist" moments don't bother me either. I find it ironic that some fans of James Bond, the embodiment and icon of masculinity, are triggered by masculine traits?

    Some people just like to create drama out of nothing.

    If that's what were happening at all then you'd have a point, but it isn't is it. It's just people being able to still enjoy these things whilst being capable of simultaneously recognising the issues with doing anything like that today, because we have moved on a bit.
    007HallY wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    meshypushy wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    meshypushy wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    @Scaramanga1974
    In what way is OP racist?
    I actually happened to watch OP in the last week (not prompted by this thread) - the only thing that stood out to me was Bond’s comment ‘that should keep you in curry for a few weeks’ after winning at the casino.

    So yes, that's poking fun at a minor aspect of what many in the West associate with Indian culture. I don't see that as discriminatory or deliberately offensive, though. Look, I don't want to be "that guy", I'm just troubled by accusations of racism, which is a very serious thing. We have become very careful when zooming in on specific parts of someone else's culture for shits and giggles, recognizing the possibility of coming off as insensitive and whatnot. And it's a good thing that we have. But in my humble opinion there's a huge gap between emphasizing unfortunate stereotypes and being blatantly racist. The latter implies that you're treating people as inferior, that you're excluding them from the freedoms we should all share, merely on the basis of their culture or ethnicity.

    Films often use stereotypes as narrative shorthand; OP is no exception. India is a fairly exotic destination for 007. The film emphasizes that by exaggerating the obvious differences between the Western world and this beautiful part of Asia. OP also makes Americans look a bit silly, Russians almost savage, and women mere objects of lust. But is TLD any better in that regard? Afghan people look like warring sages (apart from the one that received an Oxford education…), Americans are gun-worshipping capitalists, chesty women are an obvious distraction, and so on. Surely, most of this didn’t bother us when we were a lot younger. Such stereotypes often helped us to understand what was going on.

    All I’m saying is – and apologies for going so lengthy here – that while I recognize the insensitivities of OP, I don’t think it’s racist, let alone more racist than TLD (or most other Bond films, for that matter.)
    Agreed - no Bond movie offends me in the slightest. I understand that people have issues with aspects of the older movies (up to SF, apparently) but Bond is inherently a bastard and all art is a product of its time. Different times and all that.

    This is true. I think LALD or the aforementioned Temple of Doom are more racist than Octopussy; they don't offend me per se as they are products of their time, but as we have all the people saying this stuff shouldn't be edited etc. as we 'should learn from it', then I think part of that learning means that you have be comfortable with calling it out as such.

    No they're not:
    Racism is discrimination and prejudice against people based on their race or ethnicity.
    Making a stereotype isn't racist unless you do it to show that the one you're making a stereotype off is inferior to you.
    And curry isn't only associated with India in the West, Indians themselves find it part of their culture. Would I be 'discriminated' if somebody made a remark about me and cheese as a Dutchman? No, it's part of my culture. Try @DartDimi and beer. You won't upset him in the slightest.

    Let's keep the word racism for what it really means.

    Well, stereotypes can still be racist, and that inferiority element isn't always clear cut.

    The curry line in OP does stick out to be fair. It's noticeably a bit weird/cringey especially when seen today, and has that racial/cultural bias as a line. I don't think a comment about cheese/a Dutchman has quite the same connotation given that it's directed at an Indian, and one who is in this case subservient to Bond in a relatively stereotypical way (for better or for worse). It's kind of similar to the moment in DN where Bond barks at Quarrel to fetch his shoes. I'm sure there's stuff in that nowadays we'd find slightly uncomfortable that weren't as apparent to many at the time. Honestly though, there's much worse you can find in films, and Bond as a series isn't bad for these sorts of things. It's a lame line as well.

    Yes, exactly. Trying to say 'this isn't racist because if you did it to a Dutchman..' isn't the same, because the experience of different races aren't reversible like that; if they were then we really would have no racism, but we do.
    As you say though, I don't think 'racist' would ever be the first word that comes to mind when I think of Octopussy either.

    I've always had the impression that they curry line was something Roger himself added. I don't know if it was, but it doesn't quite feel in line with the script and sticks out like you say, and I get the feeling he liked a cheesy gag like that. I'm not saying he would have meant anything bad by it, I just get that impression. Much like the 'it's a wonderful racket, this!' gag he does almost off-mike in the same location!
  • LALD clearly has the slightest bit of racism about it: book and film. Think of the optics of a white man saving a white woman from a bunch a black men who kidnapped her. While not blatant enough to take offence, it is a bit dodgy...
  • edited July 14 Posts: 23
    If that's what were happening at all then you'd have a point, but it isn't is it. It's just people being able to still enjoy these things whilst being capable of simultaneously recognising the issues with doing anything like that today, because we have moved on a bit.

    My issue is when certain reviews or ranking videos come with snide remarks about the past. Things like "that didn't age well" or "this scene makes me uncomfortable" implies that there's something inherently wrong with it. I didn't expect so many Bond fans to be progressives/leftists, since Bond is inherently a masculine, traditional figure who understands game (social dynamics and female nature).

    The idea that we have 'moved on' is subjective and many people would disagree, but this is treading on political discussion which I won't get into.
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 13,823
    Isn't Bond making a joke related to Vijay's cover as a snake charmer/street peddler/beggar? Doesn't automatically warrant a serious reassessment.

  • Posts: 618
    TLD... by far.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,804
    CraterGuns wrote: »
    TLD... by far.

    Yep.
  • Posts: 1,917
    peter wrote: »
    FoxRox wrote: »
    I personally prefer AVTAK, but I understand why OP is generally preferred. The latter is more consistent, but the good things about AVTAK like the music and Walken and May Day really elevate it for me. It’s got its issues, but it’s got some really fun highs for me that OP didn’t have. All just taste anyway! Both are fun experiences but not close to my top tier.

    @FoxRox theres NO DOUBT that Walken and Jones elevated AVTAK. They were unbelievable and I love all their scenes.

    The last time I watched the film, I really missed when at least one of these two weren’t on the screen.
    Back when the Ultimate Edition DVD sets came out I got them for Christmas and checked each out and put in AVTAK and my father-in-law was mystified as to why I kept fast-forwarding through the film and that's exactly what I was doing - watching only the Walken/Zorin scenes. I still find May Day's character arc one of the great lost opportunities by robbing us of a final confrontation with Bond. At least Jaws turning good in MR was in the spirit of that film whereas Bond had a personal score, especially with Tibbet's death.

    I find the section from when Bond arrives in San Francisco up until when Zorin shows up in Howe's office to be perhaps the most boring of any Bond film, although TWINE could provide some competition.

  • Posts: 1,917
    As far as the vote goes, TLD all the way, although OP is my favorite Moore film by far. TLD was the Bond film I'd been hoping for since becoming a huge Bond fan and fulfilled that desire led by the actor who most resembled the man I read about in Fleming's stories. 37 years later I feel the same way and still mourn the premature end of the Dalton Bond's era.
  • Posts: 7,509
    BT3366 wrote: »
    As far as the vote goes, TLD all the way, although OP is my favorite Moore film by far. TLD was the Bond film I'd been hoping for since becoming a huge Bond fan and fulfilled that desire led by the actor who most resembled the man I read about in Fleming's stories. 37 years later I feel the same way and still mourn the premature end of the Dalton Bond's era.

    Yep!
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,592
    I'll vote TLD but I feel that I enjoy half of each film.

    For example, the second half of OP, once Bond meets Octopussy, it really picks up. Not a huge fan of stuff leading up to it.

    TLD has probably the best first half of any Bond film. For me, the second half, once Bond arrives in Morroco, that I kinda lose interest
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    edited July 15 Posts: 2,082
    I just love absolutely everything about TLD. It's my second favorite Bond film and second favorite soundtrack as well.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,509
    I just love absolutely everything about TLD. It's my second favorite Bond film and second favorite soundtrack as well.

    Even the Ferris wheel bit?

    I love almost every scene in the film save for that damn Ferris wheel and, “are you calling me a horse’s arse”…. Oh man, do I ever dislike these two scenes, 😂!
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    edited July 15 Posts: 2,082
    peter wrote: »
    I just love absolutely everything about TLD. It's my second favorite Bond film and second favorite soundtrack as well.

    Even the Ferris wheel bit?

    I love almost every scene in the film save for that damn Ferris wheel and, “are you calling me a horse’s arse”…. Oh man, do I ever dislike these two scenes, 😂!

    Lol. I love those scenes. But I know what you mean, but I still love them. I think those scenes just add to the honesty in the relationship between Bond and Kara. Maybe top contender for the most romantic encounter in a Bond film. Like I really felt Bond and Kara really liked each other.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,509
    peter wrote: »
    I just love absolutely everything about TLD. It's my second favorite Bond film and second favorite soundtrack as well.

    Even the Ferris wheel bit?

    I love almost every scene in the film save for that damn Ferris wheel and, “are you calling me a horse’s arse”…. Oh man, do I ever dislike these two scenes, 😂!

    Lol. I love those scenes. But I know what you mean, but I still love them. I think those scenes just add to the honesty in the relationship between Bond and Kara. Maybe top contender for the most romantic encounter in a Bond film. Like I really felt Bond and Kara really liked each other.

    You’re a lucky man, then!!

    In all seriousness, it’s no bother to me. TLD is such a great Bond adventure, two small scenes don’t take away from the massive enjoyment I get from the film.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,082
    peter wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    I just love absolutely everything about TLD. It's my second favorite Bond film and second favorite soundtrack as well.

    Even the Ferris wheel bit?

    I love almost every scene in the film save for that damn Ferris wheel and, “are you calling me a horse’s arse”…. Oh man, do I ever dislike these two scenes, 😂!

    Lol. I love those scenes. But I know what you mean, but I still love them. I think those scenes just add to the honesty in the relationship between Bond and Kara. Maybe top contender for the most romantic encounter in a Bond film. Like I really felt Bond and Kara really liked each other.

    You’re a lucky man, then!!

    In all seriousness, it’s no bother to me. TLD is such a great Bond adventure, two small scenes don’t take away from the massive enjoyment I get from the film.

    Absolutely! Such a great Bond film.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,804
    peter wrote: »
    I just love absolutely everything about TLD. It's my second favorite Bond film and second favorite soundtrack as well.

    Even the Ferris wheel bit?

    I love almost every scene in the film save for that damn Ferris wheel and, “are you calling me a horse’s arse”…. Oh man, do I ever dislike these two scenes, 😂!

    Lol. I love those scenes. But I know what you mean, but I still love them. I think those scenes just add to the honesty in the relationship between Bond and Kara. Maybe top contender for the most romantic encounter in a Bond film. Like I really felt Bond and Kara really liked each other.

    Absolutely! Bond & Pam had a great (albeit different) chemistry as well IMO!
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,082
    chrisisall wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    I just love absolutely everything about TLD. It's my second favorite Bond film and second favorite soundtrack as well.

    Even the Ferris wheel bit?

    I love almost every scene in the film save for that damn Ferris wheel and, “are you calling me a horse’s arse”…. Oh man, do I ever dislike these two scenes, 😂!

    Lol. I love those scenes. But I know what you mean, but I still love them. I think those scenes just add to the honesty in the relationship between Bond and Kara. Maybe top contender for the most romantic encounter in a Bond film. Like I really felt Bond and Kara really liked each other.

    Absolutely! Bond & Pam had a great (albeit different) chemistry as well IMO!

    Yes. True.
  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 5,440
    Great discussion again!

    Lets pit two revenge style stories together and see which one we prefer.

    Would you rather watch LTK OR QOS?

    Both films feature Bond going rogue. Both have Bond in a strange land without the help of Mi6. Both films feature a female character who is also looking to take down or at least gain some revenge on the villain and who knows about the villains operation. Both films down play laughs for a serious tone. Both feature water action, LTK underwater and QOS a boat chase. Both films feature a Theme song that doesn't rank highly on the best song lists.

    Which one are you more likely to throw into your player?
  • Posts: 12,479
    LTK, but it’s practically a tossup still because I love both a lot. But I think LTK’s the more balanced film and experience.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,191
    I like both films but right now, I'd choose LTK simply because I saw QOS more recently, whereas LTK has been a while. Not the best of reasons, I know. ;-)
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,509
    QoS. It’s a better produced film. And it’s the choice I’ll go with.

    The first half of LTK, especially is hard on the eyes. The tv actors didn’t help matters.

    I do really enjoy both, though.
  • Posts: 1,372
    LTK is a top ten movie IMO. The only problem is that TLD exists.
    QoS is, well, QoS. Good enough for Statham.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,641
    QOS for me.
    The style, the action and the acting are all brilliant. If the script had been further developed and the editing was a bit more cohesive it'd be top 5 for me.

    LTK has grown on me though, the action is excellent (best underwater sequences of the series in my opinion) but like Peter said, it does have a TV feel in places.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,804
    FoxRox wrote: »
    LTK, but it’s practically a tossup still because I love both a lot. But I think LTK’s the more balanced film and experience.

    I was about to post, but you said precisely what I was going to....
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,218
    I think I'd have to go with LTK.

    QoS has a number of things over it: the locations, the technical aspects, the music...

    But LTK has a prime Dalton, a top three Bond girl, and a top five Bond villain.

    They're both regularly rewatched, though.
Sign In or Register to comment.