It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
With a smaller, but stellar stunt earlier on as tease. That impresses, but as the PTS continues the audience wonders what's up and is something else on the way.
CR was the only film in which a grounded PTS worked to a tee
I’m going to be slightly contrarian though and say if it’s a PTS without Bond I’d like a big stunt. That’d be kinda unique. But it all depends on how it’s done.
This is also my idea. I'd even be in for one setting up the villan(s) rather than Bond, such as in FRWL, LALD, TMWTGG. Although when done right, I'm in for all of the choices.
Sounds great. I suggest you work on it and write something in the Bond 26 plot ideas thread.
Straight out of the book! Would you keep it unrelated to the main plot perhaps?
Lets move on to another subject entirely.
It's a battle of the un-official Bonds!
Would you rather watch CR 67 OR NSNA?
CR 67 has some absolutely crazy plotting. It does feature David Niven as Sir James Bond which, according to legend, was someone that Fleming envisioned playing Bond. We have Ursula Andress returning to a Bond movie as Vesper. We have the comic genius of Peter Sellers and Woody Allen in the same film. There is a wonderful score by Burt Bacharach too!
On the other hand we have the original Bond returning after over 10 years being away from the role. We have a wonderful Felix Leiter portrayed by Bernie Casey who has chemistry with Connery. The plot is the same although they did tinker with some of it. We have a femme fatale that brings some energy and over the top acting to the piece.
Both films are flawed and lack the EON touches, but which one would you rather watch
NSNA is clearly meant to be a Bond film, and even though it lacks the recognisable EON tropes, there are quite a few good Bond moments in it. So if I'd be in for a Bond movie, I'd choose NSNA.
CR67 is the first true Bond spoof, but instead of a protagonist going by the name of Austin Powers, Johnny English or the even better Hubert Bonisseur de la Bath, it just happens to have the legal rights to call him James Bond. If I'm in the mood for that kind of thing, which does happen sometimes, I'd go for CR67.
To be perfectly honest however, and even though I'm definitely in the camp that can enjoy both, if I'm in the mood for a Bond film most EON's are obviously still a better choice, and if I'm in the mood for a Bond spoof the delicious OSS 117 films with Jean Dujardin are my first options.