It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
What a waste of time.
And only a short while away from a session of DAD/Brosnan bashing.
The article about Arnolds movie and how it all went wrong was an interesting read. thank you.
Not that the film encountered problems once shooting began, but Freddy vs Jason took it's time to get made, 10 years in fact. Actually it might've taken longer considering New Line wanted to make FvJ before JGTH, hence them aquiring the F13 films. The R2 copy of JGTH has in the extras an article printed by Fangoria that charted the history of FvJ and it's many, many writers. [/ramble]
Fitzcarraldo anyone? Recasting, an imfamous Klaus Kinski meltdown, reshoots & dysentery earn Fitzcarraldo a place in this thread.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080391/
I once watched it back to back with Kentucky Fried Movie...
or how about Ellen Brody having flashbacks to memories she didn't have lol.... not to mention, that the shark - when it gets struck by the boat, explodes for no reason.
Yeah, and first it eats Mario van Peebles, but once it blows up, he appears still alive and not injured (no shark bites, no explosion damage)... This movie is raeally one big silly turkey...
Poor Sam. I never knew all this, and I don't blame Sam, Tobey, and Kirsten from bailing. I would've too. Spiderman 3 never happened anyway. 1 and 2 are the only films in the series. ;)
I do like that movie, it never fails to make me grin.
That film was centred entirely around toys.
Alien 4 had its moments but the human alien hybrid was not good not good at all.
Alien 3 was alright - it wasn't great, but it was decent... props to David Fincher on that being his first directed big feature film.... Alien Resurrection was a total waste of time for me though.
I liked the cloned Ripley a lot and the ideas weren't that bad, especially the underwaterscenes on the spaceship were quite well done. There was also a reversal in the androids which I liked. The movie was chockfull of these little flashes of brilliance. I wonder how much Joss Whedon was responsible for that.
However I am still not sure about the design of the human/alien. But its story did fit in with the Ripley / Newt / lost daughter / mother theme.
There was a film between all them toys?
:)) :)) :)) =)) =)) =))
Indeed - and it was "chilling" ;)
(in Awnold voice)
i think it's time to cool it with the puns.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093300/reviews