It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
However, I still quite enjoyed DAF and might actually rank it higher than YOLT. AVTAK and DAD usually rank in my bottom five. LTK goes against the argument, though. I almost always rank LTK in my top five to ten.
Take LALD as an example. The sheer audacity shines through. A boat chase? Why, we'll set a new world record! No long-term life for the series after Connery? Watch Moore skip over the crocodiles, and get back to us on that. There is a reason why the general movie-going audience remembers this film... Goldeneye provided a similar shot-in-the-arm to the series.
Their last films have, in my opinion, been a disappointment, although every Bond film has its moments, of course. In general, Diamonds Are Forever was just tacky (NSNA doesn't count to me), AVTAK tired, LTK grim, unglamorous, and lacking any sort of twinkle (even Dalton seems to have been disappointed by this film), and with DAD, no elaboration is necessary.
I think when the Bond films lose their audacity and their ambition, then the product suffers.
I still love them all, though...
Connery-Dimanonds are Forever & Never Say Never Agian: he was rather bored in the role and didnt seem to have much enthusiasm. he had a bit more enthusasium for Never Say Never Agian but some scenes he just seemed bored riggid- like the scene with Roman Aktison.
Moore- A View To A Kill the same with Connery he just seemed very bored- he had his swansong with octopussy and i could tell he didnt enjoy AVTAK- i mean being with girls nearly 40 years longer seemed a bit well icky and well the less said about Grace Jones the better.
Dalton- unfairly his tentured ended with a very 80's cliched american action film, he gave a good peformance but was cut down due to legal biddings in which he couldnt make bond 17 (Property of a Lady as it was in the first draft)
Brosnan- i feel the most saddest for Brosnan to bow out of one of the worst bond films of all time (Second to Qantum of Solace ofcourse) but he was unfourtunately giving his best peformance as Bond but he was saddled with an annoying catwoman, a pantomine smug villian, a linear storyline and an invisible car (Basically Moonraker for The 21st Century) i would have loved to have seen Brosnan do a FYEO...it would have been a more decatdent way to go...
AVTAK - 4/10
LTK - 7/10
DAD - 4/10
I agree except for the part about May Day. she was a campy and interesting henchwoman. She was not as bad as Jaws in MR, a film that which sucked royally (except for the PTS)
Moore hit his stride with TSWLM and maybe he should have quit after OP. It would have been a great swansong for him. Heck DAF sucked and so did DAD. Moore's final film is in keeping with other Bonds as going out stinking up the screen.
I have to agree with the post that said DAD should have been another FYEO and Brosnan an immensly popular Bond at the time could have gone out on top. Hindsight is 20/20...
Could you imagine if Pierce hung around as long as Roger??
You hated CR?! SACRILEGE!
@OHMSS69 I agree with the PTS of MR, was the best bit of the film with the parachute thing, and it was all right, just all right, untill Jaws fell in love...
The problem I have with May Day is that I see her as "Jaws 2, now he is a woman". Think about it, superstrong, fell in love with a man, and finnally helped Bond... Maybe it's just me but...
DN >> DAF
LALD > AVTAK
TLD = LTK
GE >>>>> DAD
CR >>> QOS
Of course Bond will never retire. ;-)
Since the filmmakers apparently want us to believe that most if not all the actors are playing the same character (via the references to Tracy for Lazenby, Moore, Dalton, and arguably, Brosnan), maybe they can't deal with aging because then how to explain the fact that Bond repeatedly gets older, then younger again?
You could argue that the missions/movies take place in a different order but the contemporary references in each make this problematic.
Just know in the back of your head that no matter what movie you're looking at, James Bond is 35-40 years old
What I liked about NSNA--one of the few things--is that it addressed Connery's age. But that was a one-off film. Maybe that's impossible in EON's series.
I came up with the idea a month or 2 ago of a one off starring dalton, set now. He would've messed up or almost messed up during the PTS, so he wants to retire. But an old girlfriend is kidnapped by some evil villian and bond is forced to do one last mission. And in the end bond gets married and retires. Then afterwards get a young actor and carry on as normal.
Connery 1962-67 / 1971
Dr No, - a fine worthy start to the franchise, lots to get involved in, a very good Bond film and Connery at his finest
Diamonds, - overblown, tired, jaded and uninspiring and that's just Connery himself, a major disappointment for the man as he departed from the official series, as with License to Kill ahead of it, it just does not feel like a Bond movie sometimes
Moore 1973-85
Live and Let Die - exotic, lively, vibrant and mysterious, yes it's all very dated now, but it's my favorite Bond adventure, a fine start for Mr Moore
A View to a Kill - poor fare and an overall letdown, it was disappointing if not overall silly and absurd
Dalton 1987-89
The Living Daylights - Dalton looked the part, a real spy adventure, a bit dull at times but Dalton added a much needed steel and reality to the part after Moore's departure
License to Kill - It's not bad, the main issue I have is it simply doesn't have the feel of a Bond film, yes there are certain elements but it strays too far from the path too often, Dalton is still very good though and very much at home as Bond
Brosnan 1995-2002
Goldeneye - very good outing, Brosnan looks the part, acts well, very plausible sometimes, lots to get involved in etc
Die Another Day - do I really need to add anything here?, some may have enjoyed it, but it's simply the worst of the Brosnan lot and even Pierce himself could not have saved this mess
Craig 2006-08
Casino Royale - injected some much needed spark and life into James Bond again, lots to get involved with, action, suspense, hard edged reality
Quantum of Solace - Haven't seen it for years now, but am fully aware that this follow up was a major disappointment, weak characters, awful music, Craig couldn't repeat the success of first time out, all told it's by far the weaker of the two
Therefore it's blatantly obvious that a Bond actors first appearance is by far better than their last, we can't include Lazenby in this on the basis of one film and Craig still has more to offer but there you are
AVTAK: I love it, no matter what anyone says! This is a Bond classic all the way!
LTK: Purely epic, my #3 Bond movie!!!
DAD: Too much cheese and fake CGI graphics, not to mention terrible villains. Definitely a weak Last Bond
To be fair, I'm betting all the others wanted that too. But the actors don't direct and they don't write scripts. And I wouldn't say any trend exists anyway, LTK is the best bond film ever and AVTAK isn't too bad.