It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
*Copyright Saxondale.
DAD is just a laugh from beginning to end,you can switch your brain off and go with the flow.
I don't have many issues with the film...
- Some god-awful dialogue from time to time "Yo momma" being the worst of it
- Halle Berry
- The landspeeder and Tsunami sequence
- Madonna's theme song
- VR gadget sequences
- Michael Madsen as Damien Falco
- Bond stopping his heart and mentally triggering it back up again on command
- Those hilariously bad goggles that Graves wears and that reveal of them LOL
- The ridiculous change from Colonel Moon to Gustav Graves the billionaire diamond horder featuring a massive ice palace and a giant laser satellite in the sky who gets knighted by the queen in less than 18 months
Even that last one I can deal with, it's simply the time frame in which it occurs that actually bothers me. If it was say... 5 years at least, then I'd be more accepting.
Most of the CGI is relatively low scale and does little to bother me. They typically utilize live action with computer graphics. Even the Antonov plane is a miniature with some collision added in post to wrap CG fire and smoke around. The invisible Aston Martin is fun stuff in my opinion. Obviously their are limits to these things, I'd never want to see an invisible car in TWINE or Skyfall, but it works fine in an exaggerated Bond film like this one.
I'm actually a fan of Zao as a henchman, he has a very unique look and gets some great action sequences with Bond.
A few other things I like are...
- Costume designs by Lindy Hemming
- Locations are great
- Set designs are brilliant
- Some of the best action in the series (car chase on ice, fencing sequence, hovercraft)
- Solid score from David Arnold
- Anniversary elements (once again, fun for a one time thing but not something I need again)
I could go on but I'd spend an hour on this post. I find most of the stuff that bothers me makes up for a rather small percentage of the film and everything else ranges from okay to great in my opinion.
The Craig era really hasn't helped DAD gain much respect.
Compare Bond meets Jinx, to Bond meets Vesper. Another universe. It's like comparing Moonraker to From Russia With Love.
The world certainly changed while he was away!
Must be too busy denying his staff their basic rights and wallowing in the post Brexit bonfire of regulations
The Wiz did start this thread. Maybe he's busy writing the new season of Mrs. Brown Boys?
My issue with SF is that I was massively disappointed.
It's not that it's a bad film although I really do think it's very good. It's that I feel it squandered so much potential from Casino Royale and quantum solace.
Those two films reset the series and suggested really interesting new directions in which way in which the series could move.
Skyfall for me was just a really retrograde step. Didn't suggest anywhere new or interesting for the movies to go.
I was slated on here at the time for saying it but that still how I feel.
I feel a similar way about spectre. Although I think it's more enjoyable film Skyfall I really don't think Mendez has taken the bond movies in a very interesting direction. Spectre in a way is the film that I was expecting after skyful.
+2
TWINE is dull. At least DAD isn't.