It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
No he isn't. Bonds handling of him is one of the best ( and defining )in the franchise.
Yes he is. He's maybe an underling and an amateur, but that's why he's such a great character. He still tries his best to kill a 00 out of fear of his employer.
He is also sufficiently sinister and sneaky,a good character.
Anthony Dawson plays him perfectly.
I concur. and I think this has been said a few pages back as well. Glover is dirty as can be.
Deginitely not for me. I hardly find anything entertaining in DAF
Yeah I'm kind of with you on that.
Though there are some enjoyable moments of pitch black humour in the first half. You can imagine Fleming coming up with an undertakers firm called Mr. Slumber.
How could you ever miss out Thunderball here for the first magic four? For me GF is the weak one in that list, and DAF doesn't even approach it. It's a weak, lazy film riddled with mistakes. The first Austin Powers if you will. It has one of the best title songs though, I'll give you that. But the dialogue is weak and inconsistent too. Yes, it has funny lines, but that's just mockery.
TB is waaaaaaay better than GF,if we are looking at Connery's best 3 films.
Err because it's duller than An Evening With Rory Kinnear?
Fixed for you. Dear Baz you support Arsenal, hate Kara and think TB is better than GF. There really is no hope for you old son.
The first Austin Powers? In my mind that honor goes to YOLT.
At least i'm semi-unique,Wiz he he ;)
I wasn't aware you found Rory Kinnear so entertaining! :-D :-D
You certainly are 'special' mate.
I would only find Rory Kinnear entertaining if he was being mauled by a polar bear.
For me that's an erotic fantasy not a violent one!
+1.
Difficult to argue with this. DAF might entertain and have quite a few amusing lines but its almost a parody of a Bond film. The first 20 mins arent bad but after it leaves Amsterdam it gets progressively worse and worse without even the nuggets of quality that pepper TB.
TB, is, at least, a Bond film.
Personally my Connery rankings:
FRWL - No explanation necessary.
GF/DN - DN is getting better with age and GF worse and relying on its iconic moments which fortunately are plentiful. In another couple of years though I think DN will have 2nd spot to itself.
TB/YOLT - Again tough to separate. YOLT has a fairly underwhelming first half and a barnstormer of a second half. TB ebbs and flows from enjoyable Bondian romp to mind freezingly dull tedium.
DAF - Just lacklustre all round. Still largely an enjoyable watch though and it's probably more fun to sit through than TB despite the latter being empirically a better Bond film.
NSNA - Not as good as TB. Can't get much more damning than that.
Thanks to SP.
And Bond 25.