›

Controversial opinions about Bond films

1…8586889091…707

Comments

  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Perilagu_Khan wrote:
    I agree. And that's the end of that.

    Next controversy!

    The Brosnan films are not canon. They are filth.
  • WillyGaloreWillyGalore
    Posts: 6,396
    Thunderfinger wrote:
    Perilagu_Khan wrote:
    I agree. And that's the end of that.

    Next controversy!

    The Brosnan films are not canon. They are filth.

    I don't really like his last 3 films, but GE is an absolute cracker.
  • 00130013
    Posts: 1,817
    I don't know if this is controversial, but I like TND as much as GE. It's a solid-action flick, with some mistakes but overall stands very well.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,801
    Thunderfinger wrote:
    The Brosnan films are not canon. They are filth.

    How shall I hand unto you your death? Sweet or sour?
  • SoundofthesinnersSoundofthesinners
    Posts: 3,236
    Thunderfinger wrote:
    Perilagu_Khan wrote:
    I agree. And that's the end of that.

    Next controversy!

    The Brosnan films are not canon. They are filth.

    You can hate them all you want (still wrong, but that's a separate argument), but you have absolutely no leg to stand on when you claim they're not canon.
  • WillyGaloreWillyGalore
    Posts: 6,396
    chrisisall wrote:
    Thunderfinger wrote:
    The Brosnan films are not canon. They are filth.

    How shall I hand unto you your death? Sweet or sour?

    Brilliant

    :))
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,801
    0013 wrote:
    I don't know if this is controversial, but I like TND as much as GE. It's a solid-action flick, with some mistakes but overall stands very well.
    I like TND just a teensy tiny bit better than GE, but both are great, cannon, and antifilth.
  • 00130013
    Posts: 1,817
    chrisisall wrote:
    0013 wrote:
    I don't know if this is controversial, but I like TND as much as GE. It's a solid-action flick, with some mistakes but overall stands very well.
    I like TND just a teensy tiny bit better than GE, but both are great, cannon, and antifilth.

    So why does it get so low ranking on average?
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    @0013, the "popular" opinion is almost always that GE is the best Brosnan film, but amongst fans, it varies a lot more.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    Thunderfinger wrote:

    The Brosnan films are not canon. They are filth.

    Genius. It's wit and reasoned argument like this that elevates MI6 above other forums.
  • 00130013
    Posts: 1,817
    It's true that GE is considered the best Brosnan by general audience but here http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/78/bond-movie-ranking-simple-list-no-details/p1 the rankings are mixed but not very positive.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    WillyGalore wrote:
    Thunderfinger wrote:
    Perilagu_Khan wrote:
    I agree. And that's the end of that.

    Next controversy!

    The Brosnan films are not canon. They are filth.

    I don't really like his last 3 films, but GE is an absolute cracker.


    Yes, cracker garbage.
    chrisisall wrote:
    Thunderfinger wrote:
    The Brosnan films are not canon. They are filth.

    How shall I hand unto you your death? Sweet or sour?


    So I take it it is appropriate for this thread?
    Soundofthesinners wrote:
    Thunderfinger wrote:
    Perilagu_Khan wrote:
    I agree. And that's the end of that.


    Next controversy!

    The Brosnan films are not canon. They are filth.

    You can hate them all you want (still wrong, but that's a separate argument), but you have absolutely no leg to stand on when you claim they're not canon.

    They are not in my collection, so not canon in my home...
    TheWizardOfIce wrote:
    Thunderfinger wrote:


    The Brosnan films are not canon. They are filth.

    Genius. It's wit and reasoned argument like this that elevates MI6 above other forums.

    So we agree on that.

  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    @Thunderfinger is a bell end. Controversial opinion?
  • WillyGaloreWillyGalore
    Posts: 6,396
    RC7 wrote:
    @Thunderfinger is a bell end. Controversial opinion?

    It's cracker garbage! ;-)
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    0013 wrote:
    It's true that GE is considered the best Brosnan by general audience but here http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/78/bond-movie-ranking-simple-list-no-details/p1 the rankings are mixed but not very positive.

    The general audience also rank Goldfinger as the #1 Bond quite commonly. People can be wrong, as political democracy alone has shown us, time and time again.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    edited December 2013 Posts: 45,489
    WillyGalore wrote:
    RC7 wrote:
    @Thunderfinger is a bell end. Controversial opinion?

    It's cracker garbage! ;-)
    "Get ma bellend in your mouth bitch" was the first thing that came up when I googled it. Sorry, English is not my mother tongue. Is that correct? In that case, very controversial, I think.

  • 00130013
    Posts: 1,817
    0BradyM0Bondfanatic7 wrote:
    0013 wrote:
    It's true that GE is considered the best Brosnan by general audience but here http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/78/bond-movie-ranking-simple-list-no-details/p1 the rankings are mixed but not very positive.

    The general audience also rank Goldfinger as the #1 Bond quite commonly. People can be wrong, as political democracy alone has shown us, time and time again.

    Yes, but do you also believe that TND is underrated?
  • WillyGaloreWillyGalore
    Posts: 6,396
    Thunderfinger wrote:
    WillyGalore wrote:
    RC7 wrote:
    @Thunderfinger is a bell end. Controversial opinion?

    It's cracker garbage! ;-)
    "Get ma bellend in your mouth bitch" was the first thing that came up when I googled it. Sorry, English is mot my mother tongue. Is that correct? In that case, very controversial, I think.

    =)) Maybe it's time to change your Google settings.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Enlighten me, please. Google is also filth, I guess. If you google "Google", you can search forever without finding anything negative about it, try it.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    Thunderfinger wrote:
    WillyGalore wrote:
    RC7 wrote:
    @Thunderfinger is a bell end. Controversial opinion?

    It's cracker garbage! ;-)
    "Get ma bellend in your mouth bitch" was the first thing that came up when I googled it. Sorry, English is mot my mother tongue. Is that correct? In that case, very controversial, I think.

    Point proven methinks RC7.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    TheWizardOfIce wrote:
    Thunderfinger wrote:
    WillyGalore wrote:
    RC7 wrote:
    @Thunderfinger is a bell end. Controversial opinion?

    It's cracker garbage! ;-)
    "Get ma bellend in your mouth bitch" was the first thing that came up when I googled it. Sorry, English is mot my mother tongue. Is that correct? In that case, very controversial, I think.

    Point proven methinks RC7.

    TheWizardOfIce wrote:
    Genius. It's wit and reasoned argument like this that elevates MI6 above other forums.

  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,801
    Thunderfinger wrote:
    chrisisall wrote:
    Thunderfinger wrote:
    The Brosnan films are not canon. They are filth.
    How shall I hand unto you your death? Sweet or sour?
    So I take it it is appropriate for this thread?

    Oh, laff, dude! :))
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    0013 wrote:
    0BradyM0Bondfanatic7 wrote:
    0013 wrote:
    It's true that GE is considered the best Brosnan by general audience but here http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/78/bond-movie-ranking-simple-list-no-details/p1 the rankings are mixed but not very positive.

    The general audience also rank Goldfinger as the #1 Bond quite commonly. People can be wrong, as political democracy alone has shown us, time and time again.

    Yes, but do you also believe that TND is underrated?

    It's been years since I watched it all in one sitting, so I don't consider my opinion relevant in this case.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    As much as I love cats, Oddjob should have had a cat for dinner in the film as well. Regards, Bellend.
  • fjdinardofjdinardo
    Posts: 1,970
    Change of topic. Charles Gray was a great Blofeld
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,584
    0013 wrote:
    I don't know if this is controversial, but I like TND as much as GE. It's a solid-action flick, with some mistakes but overall stands very well.
    When TND first came out, I would've agreed with this- or even said TND was better- (I probably over-hyped it because it was my first cinematic viewing), but as others have pointed out, TND seems to drop in quality slightly in the second half, whereas GE is pretty consistent all the way through. These days, in terms of Brozza's films, I regard TND as 'nearly as good' as GE, although there a quite a few non-Broz films separating the two.
  • thelivingroyalethelivingroyale
    edited December 2013 Posts: 12,837
    RC7 wrote:
    @Thunderfinger is a bell end. Controversial opinion?

    Nah I think most of us would agree with you on that.
  • 002002
    edited December 2013 Posts: 581
    Thunderfinger wrote:
    Perilagu_Khan wrote:
    I agree. And that's the end of that.

    Next controversy!

    The Brosnan films are not canon. They are filth.



    1648-noface.jpg
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    fjdinardo wrote:
    Change of topic. Charles Gray was a great Blofeld

    Not as good as Savalas or the faceless one, but I agree. He made it his own, and was superb at what he did.
    thelivingroyale wrote:
    RC7 wrote:
    @Thunderfinger is a bell end. Controversial opinion?

    Nah I think most of us would agree with you on that.

    I suspect this is how you guys show affection. I appreciate it, I have similar feelings.

  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    Posts: 4,423
    0013 wrote:
    I don't know if this is controversial, but I like TND as much as GE. It's a solid-action flick, with some mistakes but overall stands very well.

    I agree with that.

    Now, for some real controversy; I love The World Is Not Enough
Sign In or Register to comment.