It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Nonetheless, it would be interesting to see in a Bond film.
Berlin, Madrid, Budapest, Prague, Milan, Bologna, Barcelona, Lisbon, Stockholm, Moscow, Tokyo, Delhi, Mumbai, Calcutta, Edinburgh, Chicago.
Why we need to return to Istanbul for the third time I am not quite sure.
As far as New York or Paris go, I think they are deserving of another visit. I feel the former visits just didn't capture much character of the cities, although the Harlem visit was interesting.
Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please. Oh, and add Vancouver, Buenos Aeries, Seoul, and Washington DC.
Paris I could see shining in a modern Bond, that's really overdue. But the best would be to visit all those places that haven't been done to death already, much more interesting than showing the same boring pics over and over. Be fresh and adventurous, show us what we don't know already.
No offence but I dont want to see 007 go to New York....or LA, or Washington, or Chicago, or San Francisco..
Why?
Because 99% of Hollywood films are set in those locations and I am bored with it.
I am bored with yet another Jennifer Aniston rom com set in New York or yet another cop drama set in LA with a car chase.
The Bond films from the off have gone to obscure parts of the world. What other film franchise sends you to Udaipur or Corfu or Bangkok? Every Hollywood film is set in America and I am bored with it. No wonder I watch French or Czech films or enjoy detective series set in Denmark. LALD did Harlem/New York very well and made N'awlins seem very exotic but can I prefer it when Bond goes to Shanghai or La Paz..
Locations I would like to see
Buenos Aires (great latin metropolis)
Florence
The Loire Valley
The Black Forest
The Galapagos Islands
The Inca trail in Peru
The reefs off Belize
Cuba properly
The Andalucian cities of Spain ie Grenada, Cordoba, Seville
Lisbon
Stockholm
Zanzibar
Northern Tanzania
Cape Town
Indonesia
Nepal
I disagree. The director just needs to know where to film. There are lots of TV shows and movies that film in NYCand you get classic NYC--as opposed to modern.
I think Bourne has already done the ultimate Parisian car chase - an absolute classic of the genre.
Has Rome ever featured in a Bond movie? Lots of potential there.
I understand what yojr saying, but I think thats a perfect reason why Bond should go to New York, or DC, or Chicago, because Bond can illustrate those cities in a diffrent way than any other movie or TV show can. If they write them into the plot correctly, they can be used in a very uniqe way...
As for Paris, I was reading the short story FAVTAK recently and I enjoyed the part where Bond meets a lovely lass at a stunning street cafe, a culture in itself in Paris. That could be used effectively. The city has a lot more than just the Eifel Rower and stereotype associations. The Bourne Identity utilised the city well so it may be difficult to head there and not have similarities drawn.
Cities I'd throw in the hat for Bond would be:
Prague, Budapest, Stockholm, Rome, Florence and Marrakech
Already done that with the Living Daylights, but by all means, go back again if they so wish
TLD used Tangier as a location but not Marrakech.
Craig, or whoever, could get all Humphrey Bogart and decide on whether to concentrate on the girl or focus on the task in hand and fight off the bad guys etc
On this one occasion I'll overlook commenting on your disgraceful spelling as you seem to have come up with an absolutely blinding idea.
Why not every two years have various cities around the world vying for the right to feature in the next Bond film in a similar process to that used to decide the world cup and olympics?
There would be various criteria they would have to fullfill such as allowing access to the filmakers to landmarks and permitting streets to be closed.
In return not only would the city feature prominently in the new film but the actor playing Bond would also be contractually obliged to feature in some promotional posters and videos for the tourist board. It would also be a way for smaller towns and cities that would never stand a chance of hosting an olympics or world cup of getting some valuable international exposure.
As someone who lives in London I have to say the prospect of the city featuring extensively in SF is getting me a lot more excited than having the olympics in town.
EON would have a choice of cities queuing up and probably willing to pay decent money for the right to 'host' Bond.
A win win for all involved as far as I can see.
The older European city have much more romantic mood than anything in the rest of the world.
That said I find South-America can offer a lot more in locations, please no more desert. And then there is Down under and Kiwi land.
Marrakesh is quite different from Tangier. Tangier is a Med trading port so isnt quite so arabic. Marrakesh is much more exotic. Its on the edge of the sahara so you get the tuareg influence and looks very different being made of red sandstone.
Paris has been underused so could make an appearance but New York features in almost every other Hollywood flick usually with Jennifer Aniston having romantic troubles or superheroes jumping between buildings.
The film world full stop has flogged New York to death.
Paris would be cool I guess. Vancouver would be good. I really want Bond to go to Australia and Ireland.