It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
But could the 'made for TV' quality of QoS also be something to do with it being (I assume) shot on digital rather than real film?
That is very true. A lot of HD TVs have different settings on them for different types of viewing. My Phillips TV has different modes like "gaming" "natural" and "cinematic". All of them affect the fluidity of the image. Fiddle around until you get the look you enjoy most. I find it quite hard to watch films in other people's houses when they have their TV on the "natural" or "normal" setting. It's terribly distracting.
I would say, that almost all of the so called 'picture enhancement' functions that Samsung build in are now turned to 'Off'!
If you're watching films always turn off the 'image/picture enhancement', the frame rate for films is 24p/s. Should look pretty good then.
QoS never looked like it was the most expensive Bond, must be the less than glamorous locations!
Oh, and Dr No is stunning on Blu-ray.
Well...I've seen FRWL and CR on blu-ray and both looked impressive (and that was on a small TV - perhaps that doesn't do it justice?)
Quantum...I dunno...doesn't quite achieve the wow factor in the cinematography stakes to me. There are some good shots but nothing like the camera sweep over the crane in CR.