It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Oddjobs_hat wasn't banned because of his beliefs. He was a previously banned member trying to sneak back in.
Yea we won't agree but banning is not a great outcome unless for cause.
OF COURSE IT IS TRUE AND PROVEN
Connery used the codename James Bond from 62 to 71.
Lazenby used it in 69.
Moore from 73 to 85.
Dalton from 87-89.
Brosnan used it from 95-02 and Craig since 06.
People who believe James Bond is their real name have some screws loose.
Hang on, wasn't James Bond actually an ornithologist who wrote Birds of the West Indies - they're all imposters!
Okay I'm starting to get this. Maybe there are other spies out there using names for codenames - Michael Jackson? The singer and the former head of the British army - both called Michael Jackson - it can't be a coincidence!
Or "Codename Conspiracy" is .... " Conspiracy Cameo Den" ?
I think this is proof that the proponents of the code name theory
are correct ! We are obviously getting directions to Head to some
Ceremony about the actor's Cameos in a secret Den !
There can be No other explanation ! :D
Isn't it time this closed now? Seriously, my ability to make fun of something is decreasing.
>:)
Good point. I'll try to be more creative in my mickey taking :)
Of course ... I have the Tanaka codename ...
Surely you must be wrong or mistaken. :p
A convenient excuse to avoid you having to deliver on your evidence, although we've long given out hope of that ever emerging.
If Mendes is out then is there any point in carrying on with this thread? The reason it has so many posts is not because we are discussing the theory (there's almost zero substantive evidence to warrant a discussion) but because we find Mendes' laughable contortions to avoid answering the question so hilarious.
Probably about 10 pages of this thread are people asking Mendes to lay his evidence before us. I'm reminded of the classic Paxman interview with Michael Howard:
So until Mendes can tell us whether he threatened to overrule him is there much more to be said here?
Unless of course people want to start posting pics of all the graves they've visited? Im up to 42,697.
Little tip for you kids: when you grow up try and get a job in a company with less than 10 employees. It will save you so much time traipsing round graveyards in the rain.
your constant whining about him kept this thread alive if anything :))
But again, I enjoy it, so don't stop. In fact, when you are gone longer than a day I show signs of withdrawal as reading your stuff is just wonderful.
I wish I had your level of wicked humour and eloquence. And I don't mean this sarcastically, I mean it.
But before you call me a kiss-ass I stop the flattering remarks :))
I'm afraid you miss the point if you think I have the slightest interest in the existence of @Mendes4lyfe.
The thread is about debating something which seems utterly improbable to most right minded people with an ounce of logic but here we have someone claiming that there's substantial evidence out there so don't we have a duty to examine this evidence to see if we are all wrong and theory holds water?
Any apparent obsession with @Mendes4lyfe is merely an attempt to expose him as a charlatan and a fool, an accusation that he seems utterly unwilling to counter by delivering his 'evidence'.
This thread was a non issue because the theory is patently bullshit. It has only got this far because Mendes has been happy to play the court jester and we've all had such a fine time laughing at his antics.
He said his piece several pages ago, and he has made it clear he has no more to add, so with heavy heart and the sword of Damocles hanging over my head, I will draw this to a close.
If anyone wishes to object please message me.
And @BondJasonBond006 if you want to start a thread about crackpot theories and weird conspiracy theories - which I believe you suggested? - then do go ahead.