This thread is designed to collate CBn Bond fan opinion on Raymond Benson's fourth Bond novel Doubleshot (2000):
did it go too far in its experimentation and in its presentation of the literary James Bond character created by Ian Fleming? Is it the The Spy Who Loved Me and The Man From Barbarossa of the Benson books? Your thoughts on this novel are much appreciated by this writer of articles.
Are there any elements of the 'locked room mystery' (made famous by John Dickson Carr) in Doubleshot?
Also, your thoughts on Doubleshot as a title - I remember saying to some friends in 1999 on learning of the new title through correspondence with Raymond Benson himself that that was the title - they said that it was not very impressive for the title of a James Bond novel. Benson originally favoured Reflections in a Broken Mirror as an alternative title - very much influenced by the first chapter of Goldfinger and the original title for '007 in New York', although sadly his own original title was denied him.
I want to try to defend Benson from some of these charges, though. A quote from Kirkus Reviews on Doubleshot on 1 May 2000:
"The creakiest exercise yet in American Bond fan Benson's postmodern resurrection of Ian Fleming's peerless killer spy, has an embarrassingly witless 007 going rogue to fight a dastardly multinational crime cartel.
Nifty bullfighting scenes do not redeem an otherwise cliché-cluttered narrative. For die-hard fans only."
Comments
What inspired IFP to give him the job I will never know!
Frankly, other than Bond's supposed state - not a new feature, TB,YOLT,TMWGG et all..-
I don't think that the excellent "Skyfall" has anything in common with this appalling piece of work. Frankly I wish IFP would let the Benson books go out of print. They are an insult to Fleming's memory and give newcomers to the literary franchise an awful impression.
However the fact is that he was just a fan who wrote a great reference book but for some reason IFP saw fit to give him the gig. His books read like fan fiction because basically they were.
I'm not sure what they should do with the literary Bond now as they have tried the fan who understands the character (Benson) and that has failed and the hired mercenary (Faulkes, Deaver) seems even worse.
Surely there must be a writer of reasonable ability out there who's also a Fleming fan.
He has demonstrated through the extremely difficult "Young Bond" assignment that he has all of the credentials for the job and would deliver in spades.
Frankly IFP should be humble enough to learn from the literary and commercial success of Anthony Horowitz's Sherlock Holmes novel, "The House Of Silk" and give the job to Higson.
The great TheWIzardOfice may be correct that Benson deserves respect for the "Bedside Companion" but this is not the subject at hand.
Are there any fans who want to give their views on this novel, if so, I want to hear from you all in this thread!
Oh, and the same with the Besnon books as well.
I'm going to finish the remaining 4 screenplay novelizations and then plunge into the Gardner and Benson originals in sequence.
These are all re-reads btw. But the Gardners and Bensons should be rather fresh all over again, as unlike the Flemings, I've only read any of these books once, and it has been a while.
Re Doubleshot. I do remember enjoying it as I was happy to have the Benson books to read at the time, but it will be a while before I get back to it, it seems.
You can get a copy relatively cheaply on Amazon - that's what I did. Yet to read it, though, so no help there.
Thank you.
Well said sir - frankly Benson made Faulks and Deaver look good and we all know how appalling they were!
I was just about to say how strange to congratulate yourself on your own posting! ;-)
Don't be too hard on him. God knows, the boy has a point. How Benson's drivel ever got into print will remain the biggest Bond mystery of all time!
I think you are all wrong, but I defend your right to have an opinion on Benson nonetheless.
I think it is one of his best novels due to the experimentation with Bond - shades of Skyfall 12 years before it was released! Those Bond fans who liked Skyfall should give Benson's Doubleshot a read.
@Dragonpol, you talk sense in so many areas surely, you must be a relative of Benson to persist with endorsing his drivel?
Failing blood ties can I suggest that you stay away from sharp objects and high ledges as Benson's Bond novels are considered the literary equivalent of self harming!
Call it my interest in the James Bond Continuation more than anything else. I may well bring you round on this in time with some future articles on my The Bondologist Blog. We'll see.