TWINE: Did Brosnan offer a definitive characterisation of 007?

1356717

Comments

  • BAIN123 wrote:
    Hmm...multiplayer :D

    I can't tell you the number of hrs I clocked up playing that.
    Me too. That, Quake, stuff like that -- I loved those games.

  • edited December 2012 Posts: 202
    TWINE definitely contained Brosnan's best performance as 007.

    Shame the film was littered with crap action sequences and Denise Richards.

    They should bring Marceau back to the series.
  • MrBrown wrote:
    Shame the film was littered with crap action sequences and Denise Richards.
    The action scenes didn't bother me so much, but Richards presense in the movie certainly was a drag for me. The movie truly suffered because she was in it, I think.

  • AliAli
    edited December 2012 Posts: 319
    Brosnan's performances, when allowed to get darker, were the perfect Bond for me. There were hints of it throughout Goldeneye, it really came through in the first half of TND, mainly with Paris, TWINE had it as well and even DAD, at the beginning, before the stupidity set in, had elements of what Pierce could have brought to the table. Unfortunately, he was let down very badly by some of the worst scripts in Bond history, Goldeneye being the one exception. That they were successful was entirely down to Pierce, IMHO, and his ability to bring charisma and character to the role even when EoN seemed to be employing 7 year olds to write the screenplays.
  • Posts: 11,425
    What Pierce suited was a more morally complex and compromised Bond. However, what they made him into (or he allowed himself to become) was the most 2 dimensional Bond so far. The Tailor of Panama gives some idea of how he could/should have played Bond.
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    MrBrown wrote:

    They should bring Marceau back to the series.

    Um, have you seen her lately? She hasn't exactly aged that well.

  • I can't see why people think the script for the TWINE was lacking. The plot is slightly convoluted, especially in the opening set-up before Bond jets off to Azerbajian. But simply put: Bond is tasked with protecting a wealthy oil heiress from her old kidnapper who wishes to extract revenge for his previous botched attempt. It's a great premise and provides the perfect starting point for a sexy spy thriller. The film then wrangles the spy and the heriess together in a twisted love affair, before providing the twist that she's been playing him and in fact is the big bad of the piece. It's a great plot and the execution is done well, the twist in particular is stand out. We're told there is an 'insider', then the film has us leads us to beleive that it is Davidov who is in league with Renard, before it becomes clear that the pair are merely pawns for Elektra.
  • Posts: 11,425
    I can't see why people think the script for the TWINE was lacking. The plot is slightly convoluted, especially in the opening set-up before Bond jets off to Azerbajian. But simply put: Bond is tasked with protecting a wealthy oil heiress from her old kidnapper who wishes to extract revenge for his previous botched attempt. It's a great premise and provides the perfect starting point for a sexy spy thriller. The film then wrangles the spy and the heriess together in a twisted love affair, before providing the twist that she's been playing him and in fact is the big bad of the piece. It's a great plot and the execution is done well, the twist in particular is stand out. We're told there is an 'insider', then the film has us leads us to beleive that it is Davidov who is in league with Renard, before it becomes clear that the pair are merely pawns for Elektra.

    You did well to pick all that up. I thought it was convoluted, unconvincing and ultimately boring, like another couple of P+W stories I can think of.
  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    Posts: 4,423
    @Pierce2Daniel – I thoroughly agree with you. It is the most underrated entry in the Bondian cannon – it's in my top five.

    Funny you mentioning the Renard/Elektra vs Bane/Talia dynamic. I was also struck by that whilst watching The Dark Knight Rises. I've brought it up on our The Dark Knight Rises thread.

    For me Pierce, along with Die Another Day, delivers his best performance, although, as you said he's a bit too melodramatic in the scenes with Bond and M in Scotland, and Bond confronts Elektra in Baku. Old Pierce is too animated in these scenes. Fleming wrote that Bond is precise in his movements, decisive and economical. He wouldn’t have acted like that. Still Brozz looks fantastic, turning in a supremely elegant, charming performance.

    However, when I saw Casino Royale, I thought “that's they were trying to do with TWINE.”
  • edited December 2012 Posts: 4,409
    royale65 wrote:
    @Pierce2Daniel – I thoroughly agree with you. It is the most underrated entry in the Bondian cannon – it's in my top five.

    Funny you mentioning the Renard/Elektra vs Bane/Talia dynamic. I was also struck by that whilst watching The Dark Knight Rises. I've brought it up on our The Dark Knight Rises thread.

    For me Pierce, along with Die Another Day, delivers his best performance, although, as you said he's a bit too melodramatic in the scenes with Bond and M in Scotland, and Bond confronts Elektra in Baku. Old Pierce is too animated in these scenes. Fleming wrote that Bond is precise in his movements, decisive and economical. He wouldn’t have acted like that. Still Brozz looks fantastic, turning in a supremely elegant, charming performance.

    However, when I saw Casino Royale, I thought “that's they were trying to do with TWINE.”

    Personally I think Brosnan is very good and rather relaxed in his scenes with Judi in Scotland, it just seems that Robert Carylise brings out the worst in him. However, one of the most stand-out moments in the film is that intial confrontation between the pair ("I'm already dead","Not dead enough for me"). The characterisation of Bond is what I consider the film does rather well, not particularly Brosnan's performance which as i've stated is a little off-kilter at times. But I do beleive that when performing with Dench and Marcau in particular there are some hsinging moments (the way he handles Elektra's pani attack is a great dramatic scene). Often Bond has been accussed of being too gritty and dark, critics have argued that those outings tend to least resemble a 'Bond film'; eg LTK and QOS. However, on the other hand if the part is played in a rather campy and jovical manner (I'm looking at you Roger) you loose that element of danger which is integral to the character. It's a matter of striking that balance. I'm not saying that Pierce's Bond over his 4 films hit that stride best as personally I like to look at the films as indivdual enities, it's just that in TWINE I feel they really knew what they wanted to do with the character and hit the balance square on.
  • Posts: 11,425
    I think most people would disagree. Pierce's performance and the character in TWINE is all over the place. He was best when he kept things fairly simple - TND.
  • edited December 2012 Posts: 12,837
    I love TWINE but I don't think it's Brosnans best performance. He has some cool moments and lines but he overacts a bit in some scenes. I actually think his best performance was in DAD.
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    Getafix wrote:
    I think most people would disagree. Pierce's performance and the character in TWINE is all over the place. He was best when he kept things fairly simple - TND.

    I agree with this.
  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    Posts: 4,423
    However, one of the most stand-out moments in the film is that intial confrontation between the pair ("I'm already dead","Not dead enough for me").

    Yeah - you've hit the nail on the head there.

    At least the Brozz and the script writers were trying something a bit different.
  • TDKR comparisons are undeniably there. Bane does exceed Renard in interestabilty, but in terms of believability both live in the world of the ridiculous (regardless of how much Nolan claims his Batman exists in the real world). However I think Bane is a more interesting character than Renard, mainly because he is a more physical opponent and Renard is a cowardly fox who disappears into the background once Elektra takes centre stage. However, Tailia is a complete misstep in comparison to Elektra, Nolan's attempts to hide the character in the shadows to make the twist more impactful essentially backfired, so instead he forgets to allow Tailia to develop a personality and has to wedge her story into the last 15 minutes of the film (far too late to be impactful in my opinion). The seeds of TWINE's twist are laid throughout the film (Davidov's supposed betrayal, Bond's doubts and M's refusal to listen to them), and in doing so Elektra is given the chance to actually be interesting. And all that "knife' metaphor in Tailia and Batman's final conformation - "Perhaps the knife was too slow" - I want to connect to the scene and find the emotional pathos but I'm not sure if its there, its just shoddy writing.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,798
    I don't think people outside of Bond enthusiasts/hobbiers really recall one of the Brosnan movies when asked about Bond.

    I don't even care about that, I like what I like regardless. I love Brosnan's good three, and TND is solidly in my top 5, along with the two that Dalton guy did.
    Goldfinger? Spy Who Loved Me? Those are Happy-meals. TLD & TND are my feast.
  • chrisisall wrote:
    I don't even care about that, I like what I like regardless. I love Brosnan's good three, and TND is solidly in my top 5, along with the two that Dalton guy did.
    Goldfinger? Spy Who Loved Me? Those are Happy-meals. TLD & TND are my feast.

    Best way to be, I find.

    And I love that comparison! :)

  • AliAli
    Posts: 319
    Getafix wrote:

    You did well to pick all that up. I thought it was convoluted, unconvincing and ultimately boring, like another couple of P+W stories I can think of.

    It wasn't so much the plot that was lacking for me. It was the very flat delivery. Electra just didn't come across as vulnerable in the beginning, or particularly clever and manipulative in the end. Marceau's almost monotone delivery, both spoken and acting, removed the film's ability to deliver a punch line. The film's tension focussed entirely around her and she couldn't deliver on it. People blame Robert Carlyle, but he really had nothing to work with. Most of his character scenes were with Marceau and you felt he might as well be talking to the wall for all the reaction he was getting. It was an intriguing idea, just very poorly paced and delivered.
  • Ali wrote:
    It wasn't so much the plot that was lacking for me. It was the very flat delivery. Electra just didn't come across as vulnerable in the beginning, or particularly clever and manipulative in the end. Marceau's almost monotone delivery, both spoken and acting, removed the film's ability to deliver a punch line. The film's tension focussed entirely around her and she couldn't deliver on it. People blame Robert Carlyle, but he really had nothing to work with. Most of his character scenes were with Marceau and you felt he might as well be talking to the wall for all the reaction he was getting. It was an intriguing idea, just very poorly paced and delivered.
    I felt the same way; it wasn't so much the plot of The World Is Not Enough as it was the delivery.

  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,798
    t wasn't so much the plot of The World Is Not Enough as it was the delivery.
    When I read that Apted was going to direct, I got a little nervous as this wasn't his usual territory. So, no surprise on the uneven-ness.
  • Ali wrote:
    It wasn't so much the plot that was lacking for me. It was the very flat delivery. Electra just didn't come across as vulnerable in the beginning, or particularly clever and manipulative in the end. Marceau's almost monotone delivery, both spoken and acting, removed the film's ability to deliver a punch line. The film's tension focussed entirely around her and she couldn't deliver on it. People blame Robert Carlyle, but he really had nothing to work with. Most of his character scenes were with Marceau and you felt he might as well be talking to the wall for all the reaction he was getting. It was an intriguing idea, just very poorly paced and delivered.
    I felt the same way; it wasn't so much the plot of The World Is Not Enough as it was the delivery.

    I don't follow. Electra is by far one of the most fleshed out characters in the series' history. She has a harrowing backstory, a proper motive behind what she's doing all marred together with an irresistible charm. Sophie Marceau is stunning in the part to the very fine details, proving she can be seductive while also excelling when displaying full-tilt villany. If the film falters in any respect it is Electra as a character who stays consistently strong. Her character by far elevates the material of the piece beyond the simple realms of a "Bond film".

  • edited December 2012 Posts: 3,327
    I never once got the impression Brozza ever wanting to tap into the source of Fleming. He never saw Bond as a flawed hero, he saw him as a super hero, with Q as a Merlin kind of figure. It makes me wonder whether Brozza actually bothered to ever read the novels. He may have claimed to have, but I bet he never did. I never once got a sense of Fleming in any of the 4 movies. The closest was Brozza sitting in a hotel room with a bottle of vodka by his side in TND, but that was more likely the script and direction than Brozza's influence.

    I never got the impression Brozza really got Fleming's Bond, like Craig and Dalton grasped. He was quite happy starring in crap like TMINE and DAD, and coming out with drivel like `we are throwing everything, including the kitchen sink at this one.' If he was given the script for CR, I can just see how hammy and OTT the ball whacking scene would have been, with the legendary `pain face' going into complete meltdown.

    It would have been a catastrophe for the franchise had Brozza appeared in CR. He didn't have a grasp on the character enough, or the acting chops to appear in a traditional Fleming adapted movie.
  • I never once got the impression Brozza ever wanting to tap into the source of Fleming. He never saw Bond as a flawed hero, he saw him as a super hero, with Q as a Merlin kind of figure. It makes me wonder whether Brozza actually bothered to ever read the novels. He may have claimed to have, but I bet he never did. I never once got a sense of Fleming in any of the 4 movies. The closest was Brozza sitting in a hotel room with a bottle of vodka by his side in TND, but that was more likely the script and direction than Brozza's influence.

    I never got the impression Brozza really got Fleming's Bond, like Craig and Dalton grasped. He was quite happy starring in crap like TMINE and DAD, and coming out with drivel like `we are throwing everything, including the kitchen sink at this one.' If he was given the script for CR, I can just see how hammy and OTT the ball whacking scene would have been, with the legendary `pain face' going into complete meltdown.

    It would have been a catastrophe for the franchise had Brozza appeared in CR. He didn't have a grasp on the character enough to appear in a traditional Fleming adapted movie.

    Bronsan often has said he was introduced to the character as a child through the films, and that was the version he came to enjoy. It makes sense his interpretation gave more weight to those elements in the character's history.

  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,798
    I don't follow. Electra is by far one of the most fleshed out characters in the series' history. She has a harrowing backstory, a proper motive behind what she's doing all marred together with an irresistible charm.
    It's a lot about acting styles- I bought Elektra hook line & sinker, but then she had a sort of 'broken' quiet to her that many take for bad acting. Hey- maybe it WAS bad acting, but it totally worked for me. Same with Pierce- he rubs some the wrong way with his enthusiasm playing Bond- personally, I think he's the perfect cinema (that is, non-Fleming) Bond.
    Then there's the direction which I feel was lacking in many spots.
  • http://www.movie-moron.com/?p=24007

    This may be worth checking out. I feel these guys make some really good points.
  • edited December 2012 Posts: 11,189
    I never once got the impression Brozza ever wanting to tap into the source of Fleming. He never saw Bond as a flawed hero, he saw him as a super hero, with Q as a Merlin kind of figure. It makes me wonder whether Brozza actually bothered to ever read the novels. He may have claimed to have, but I bet he never did. I never once got a sense of Fleming in any of the 4 movies. The closest was Brozza sitting in a hotel room with a bottle of vodka by his side in TND, but that was more likely the script and direction than Brozza's influence.

    I never got the impression Brozza really got Fleming's Bond, like Craig and Dalton grasped. He was quite happy starring in crap like TMINE and DAD, and coming out with drivel like `we are throwing everything, including the kitchen sink at this one.' If he was given the script for CR, I can just see how hammy and OTT the ball whacking scene would have been, with the legendary `pain face' going into complete meltdown.

    It would have been a catastrophe for the franchise had Brozza appeared in CR. He didn't have a grasp on the character enough, or the acting chops to appear in a traditional Fleming adapted movie.

    This is harsh and I hate reading this...but part of me agrees with you.

    Regarding Fleming I'd like to think he read a few of the books but judging by comments he has made I don't get the feeling he's particularly well versed in the literary Bond - at least not in the way that Craig and Dalton were/are.

    I also don't feel he could have "sold" the ball wacking scene as well as Craig did. Craig's screams are pretty horrific to hear in a Bond film. That's a good thing and it really adds to the tension and sheer terror that Bond experiences.

    Before people accuse me of bashing my own hero I'm not sure the likes of Connery, Laz, Moore and perhaps even Dalts could have sold that scene as well. Its tough to pull off convincingly (I think fear is probably an especially challenging emotion to act because we don't really see it much and only experience it ourselves on exceptional occasions - unlike anger which we see all the time) but Craig pulls it off and makes the sequence unsettling (in a good way).

    I will say though I think Brosnan performed well in the sequence on the bridge in DAD. I like his expression when Colonel Moon Snr tells him to "turn around". He looks scared.
  • Posts: 3,327
    BAIN123 wrote:
    This is harsh and I hate reading this...but part of me agrees with you.
    Sorry for bringing this to your attention, Bain. Sometimes the truth hurts.

    For what its worth, I actually don't mind old Brozza outside of Bond. He always comes across as a nice guy in interviews I've seen. I just never got the impression he wanted to play Bond as Fleming wrote him.

  • Brosnan was more cinema Bond. Nothing wrong with that imo.

    Unlike lots of people on here I don't think every Bond has to be close to Fleming. I like having variety.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,798
    Unlike lots of people on here I don't think every Bond has to be close to Fleming. I like having variety.
    Not only do I agree here, I actually don't think the franchise could have survived this long WITHOUT such variety!
  • edited December 2012 Posts: 11,189
    BAIN123 wrote:
    This is harsh and I hate reading this...but part of me agrees with you.
    Sorry for bringing this to your attention, Bain. Sometimes the truth hurts.For what its worth, I actually don't mind old Brozza outside of Bond. He always comes across as a nice guy in interviews I've seen. I just never got the impression he wanted to play Bond as Fleming wrote him.
    In fairness I'm not sure Moore did either (despite what he might have said about taking his inspiration from a line in the book about Bond not liking killing but taking pride in doing it well).When reading/listening to Fleming Moore is still the actor I picture least in my head. At least Brosnan has the dark/handsome looks and stern facial expressions.For Brosnan's faults in his TWINE performance I actually thought he pulled off the Electra death scene quite well. He looked like he was about to lose it but - unlike other scenes - his anger didn't seem OTT to me.
Sign In or Register to comment.