It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Eon have access to Fleming's story, idea notes etc.
Gustav Graves... step outside your world... there is more to Fleming than those four titles, as the true fan knows. Perhaps work your domain name magic to confirm for us DLAE... I'm itching to see for myself if what I'm hearing is true.
Remember: my credentials. I was the first to break Hoytema and Purvis/Wade's return.
Oooowh by jolly, "Death Leaves An Echo". I'm seriously thrilled. One needs to explain me something. How can I know these unused Fleming-titles? Where can I find them?
Again, a magnificent title....if it's true. But apparently it is :-D!
Bond 24 is 'Man's Work'.
Thanks, @StoneShi. Hope it is verified soon. :) Good point about EON's access to Fleming's notes, @ColonelSun.
Wikipedia... DLAE is one of the few useable ones remaining. The rest are clunkers that he rejected for good reason, like Undertaker's Wind (fart concept) and Man's Work (like a Tim Allen sitcom) or B movie (Infernal Machine). That leaves a few choices. Purvis and Wade have proven they are not up to the task of coining a Bond title.
I wouldn't bank on it.
Re P&W: It is not up to the writers to give the Bond film its title. That is - I think - mainly the producer's decision, although I'm sure they include others in the discussion.
Check my track record. And I'll take you up on any bet any time any place.
You know the name... name the number...
http://www.who.is/whois/jamesbond-deathleavesanecho.net AVAILABLE
http://www.who.is/whois/jamesbonddeathleavesanecho.com AVAILABLE
http://www.who.is/whois/jamesbonddeathleavesanecho.net AVAILABLE
http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanecho-film.net AVAILABLE
http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanecho-thefilm.com AVAILABLE
http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanecho-thefilm.net AVAILABLE
http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanecho-themovie.com AVAILABLE
http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanecho-themovie.net AVAILABLE
http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanechofilm.net AVAILABLE
http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanechomovie.net AVAILABLE
http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanechothefilm.com AVAILABLE
http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanechothefilm.net AVAILABLE
http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanechothemovie.com AVAILABLE
http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanecho.com AVAILABLE
Apparently, all of the above domain names are still available. Where did you find the DLAE-acronym? I couldn't find it on the official @JamesBondLive Twitter-page.
Well, it was Wade who came up with the title Skyfall, so it's certainly still possible the genesis of the title lies with Logan or P&W, or as you say B&M. The studio also have a massive say.
There's nothing wrong with emotions. They are always present with these important upcoming news updates about new Bond films. You know I'm an emotional lad as well (It's very damn obvious :-P). Still, I must conclude that "Death Leaves An Echo" hasn't been registered at all yet as domain by Sony/MarkMonitor. The title nowadays is even registered to a band/song.
Unless @StoneShi comes up with proof of the acronym "DLAE", we can not confirm anything yet....and we need to wait a cruel 24 hours :-O.
http://i.imgur.com/YV4aqHS.jpg
Not a penny. What kind of collage is thátt :-O?
Oh look, StoneShi is revealing his true self.
What a surprise.
True, titles can be suggested by writers; I'm just saying the decision is not theirs.
I'm not suggesting you're lying, but I find your troll-like behaviour at odds with someone who's supposedly an insider, or perhaps that's how you remain off the radar. If so, that's quite neat.
No, certainly not. I'm not actually sure who has final say, but I would imagine it's up to B&M to pitch to the studio and if the studio isn't sold it doesn't happen. I seem to remember the studio eventually went for QoS because the marketing guy suggested they could work in the 007 logo, ala CR.
http://t.co/yhjSW5ahcv
No one is saying the studio create the title, that is down to the creative team, but the studio can veto titles. So what might be the producers first choice, ends up being binned in favour of the studios preferred title.
But what about the MI6 twitter-account... Maybe the title will be revealed.
Seems odd that StoneShi would post such so called 'art'