› ›

SPECTRE Production Timeline

1…541542544546547…870

Comments

  • saxbysaxby
    Posts: 44
    Thanks Aaron819 for your updates. It's looking like an old school Bond Film. :-bd
  • ggl007ggl007 www.archivo007.com Spain, España
    edited March 2015 Posts: 2,541
    Another one, of course, with MAJOR SPOILERS: http://websta.me/p/938682506428299088_183460524
  • chipstickschipsticks NOT on TheDanielCraigForum where they think know Daniel Craig personally and Léa and Monica are ugly
    Posts: 560
    Senado autoriza filmación de escenas de “Spectre” en antigua sede

    EL UNIVERSAL / MÉXICO, D.F. Publicada el 11/03/2015





    Escenas de la película “Spectre” de la saga de “James Bond” podrán rodarse en la azotea y fachada de la antigua sede del Senado de la República, por acuerdo de la mesa directiva de la Cámara Alta, que condicionó esta autorización al visto bueno del Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH).

    Otra condición de los senadores es que en la filmación no se realicen alteraciones físicas a las instalaciones del Senado de la república, bajo ningún motivo o circunstancia.

    La filmación de la película “Spectre”, ocupara lugares del Centro Histórico de la Ciudad de México y una de las locaciones corresponde al exterior la antigua sede del Senado.

    La solicitud de uso de instalaciones del Senado fue presentada por Stacy Perskie, que es coproductora de Redrum S.A. de C.V., que pidió pode rodar escenas cinematográficas, en particular azotea y fachada del inmueble (…) del 5 de febrero al 10 de abril, señala el acuerdo de la mesa directiva, que preside Miguel Barbosa Huerta (PRD).

    El punto tercero del acuerdo indica que la presente se otorga previa autorización que los solicitantes deberán requerir al Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH) en el ámbito de sus atribuciones y competencias”.

    Firman la autorización los senadores; Miguel Barbosa Huerta (PRD), José Rosas Aispuro Torres (PAN), Arturo Zamora (PRI), Luis Sánchez (PRD), Rosa Adriana Díaz Lizama (PAN), Lucero Saldaña Pérez (PRI), María Elena Barrera Tapia (PVEM) y Martha Palafox Gutiérrez (PT).


    Gobierno garantiza seguridad en rodaje de cinta “Spectre”

    El Gobierno de la Ciudad de México prestará locaciones y seguridad para el rodaje de la nueva película de la saga de James Bond, "Spectre", informó el gobernador del DF, Miguel Ángel Mancera.

    Los productores de la cinta han sostenido algunas reuniones con la Secretaría de Gobierno de la ciudad "para efecto de las locaciones", indicó Mancera, al concluir un evento público en el oriente de la capital mexicana.

    "Se va a utilizar tecnología, porque la Ciudad de México no podría soportar todo un tiempo de filmación extenso", afirmó al explicar que harán algunas "tomas" y del resto se encargará la tecnología.

    Intervienen en este filme; la actriz mexicana Stephanie Sigman, la italiana Mónica Bellucci, la francesa Léa Seydoux y el británico Daniel Craig.

    La actriz y modelo mexicana Stephanie Sigman aseguró que su incorporación a "Spectre", la nueva película de "James Bond", representa los frutos de la semilla que recoge a partir de trabajo y disciplina.

    Será la primera vez que una mexicana lleve el codiciado título de "Chica Bond" .

    La película, cuyo estreno se prevé para noviembre próximo, tendrá como locaciones Londres, Inglaterra; Roma, Italia y México.




    http://www.am.com.mx/leon/mexico/senado-autoriza-filmacion-de-escenas-de-spectre-en-antigua-sede-186885.html
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    edited March 2015 Posts: 11,119
    ggl007 wrote: »
    Another one: http://websta.me/p/938682506428299088_183460524

    Little spoiler-ish, but I think everyone knows now what capabilities the Aston Martin DB10 has. But by jolly, I'm gonna frikkin' LOVE this car chase!:

    I remember how that doll got ejected by Bond in "Goldfinger". It always felt rather...uhm..cheesy :-P. The scream, that lifeless doll being thrown in the air. Undoubtedly it caused many cheers back in 1964 ;-). But I do have a feeling seeing Bond eject himself out of his DB10 will look slightly more realistic than the "Goldfinger-ejection" :-). Not only that, I think it'll cause, like with other key moments in Bond history (Bond skiing down the cliff in "TSWLM") major cheers in cinema next November. Pretty damn sure of it ;-).

    Moreover, I really think the effect in the cinema will be even bigger because of the nature of the car chase. First you have this basically terrific car chase, which is truly about Bond's driving skills, which lasts very long (7 mins), and which really has a cool, realistic "Ronin" or "Bullitt" feel to it. And then....THEN....when it really gets dangerous for 007, when you DON'T expect it at all, at the very very end of the chase, 007 frikkin' ejects himself out! BAMMM! This will cause quite a stirr in cinema!

    One last thing, to add to the realism, Q could uttering some lines like these: "007? Please be aware of this button. The Royal Air Force is using it on their F16's, in case something dangerous happens during a flight. Please only use it when you fuck up your driving skills ok?"

    And I think this is a nice movie from "Mythbusters" that goes into detail about the subject of an
    ejector seat
    , and how realistically it can be executed. For @RC7 ;-):


  • Kamran_ShahKamran_Shah
    Posts: 19
    Just wondering, did they actually film the sequence where
    Bond ejects himself from the car and lands on the Ponte Sisto?
    Thanks for letting me know!
  • aaron819aaron819 Switzerland
    Posts: 1,208
    Kamran_Shah wrote: »
    Just wondering, did they actually film the sequence where
    Bond ejects himself from the car and lands on the Ponte Sisto?
    Thanks for letting me know!

    @Kamran_Shah I don't know if they filmed the actual
    eject
    but I know they filmed the
    parachute scene
  • Seven_Point_Six_FiveSeven_Point_Six_Five Southern California
    Posts: 1,257
    @Gustav_Graves I'd recommend putting your whole post in spoiler tags
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    Seven_Point_Six_Five wrote: »
    @Gustav_Graves I'd recommend putting your whole post in spoiler tags


    Just did! Just did :-).
  • chipstickschipsticks NOT on TheDanielCraigForum where they think know Daniel Craig personally and Léa and Monica are ugly
    Posts: 560
    fred_north Starting our night on the 007 here in Roma with the Shotover K1 capturing some epic stuff...
    Be ready to see it next November 2015.
    @shotovercamera @airbushelicoptersofficial @verticalmag
    #helicopterpilot #hollywoodpilot #007movie #stuntpilot #safetyfirst #filmpilot #instagramaviation #aerialfilming #as350 #bondmovie #k1 #areyouin #thegamehaschanged #pilotlife #romeatnight 13h



    10665918_1458875854402448_540465429_n.jpg

    http://websta.me/p/938712757756276997_53598115
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    Not only that, I think it'll cause, like with other key moments in Bond history (Bond skiing down the cliff in "TSWLM") major cheers in cinema next November. Pretty damn sure of it ;-).
    Major cheers, no doubt. In the same way One Direction get major cheers when they spoon feed their fans the same thing they've heard, but in a different package. The general audience enjoy familiarity. I prefer originality in these situations.

    As for being up there, I don't see how riffing on something already iconic can then join the thing it's riffing on in those upper echelons of Bond moments. I just don't see it.

    The thing I'm excited for is the chase itself and seeing things I've not seen before.

    Regard the video, I can show you similar for an invisible car. Doesn't make it a good idea.

  • PanchitoPistolesPanchitoPistoles 2.0
    Posts: 4,619
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    by jolly

    Do people really use that expression in English?
  • Kamran_ShahKamran_Shah
    Posts: 19
    aaron819 wrote: »
    Kamran_Shah wrote: »
    Just wondering, did they actually film the sequence where
    Bond ejects himself from the car and lands on the Ponte Sisto?
    Thanks for letting me know!

    @Kamran_Shah I don't know if they filmed the actual
    eject
    but I know they filmed the
    parachute scene

    Thanks @aaron819, much appreciated!
    Did they actually film a real parachute jump onto the bridge, or did they just stage the "landing"? Would be a bit of a disappointment, if it wasn't filmed for real...
  • SarkSark Guangdong, PRC
    Posts: 1,138
    I think everyone knows now what capabilities the Aston Martin DB10 has

    nope, Im being a good boy and not reading anything with spoiler tags ;)
  • leas_moleleas_mole love is the promise of suffering
    Posts: 574
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    by jolly

    Do people really use that expression in English?
    usually if you are posh but not in much use these days
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    edited March 2015 Posts: 11,119
    RC7 wrote: »
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    Not only that, I think it'll cause, like with other key moments in Bond history (Bond skiing down the cliff in "TSWLM") major cheers in cinema next November. Pretty damn sure of it ;-).
    Major cheers, no doubt. In the same way One Direction get major cheers when they spoon feed their fans the same thing they've heard, but in a different package. The general audience enjoy familiarity. I prefer originality in these situations.

    As for being up there, I don't see how riffing on something already iconic can then join the thing it's riffing on in those upper echelons of Bond moments. I just don't see it.

    The thing I'm excited for is the chase itself and seeing things I've not seen before.

    Regard the video, I can show you similar for an invisible car. Doesn't make it a good idea.


    What I do like about how it is executed in "SPECTRE" is this:
    First you have this basically terrific car chase, which is truly about Bond's driving skills, which lasts very long (7 mins), and which really has a cool, realistic "Ronin" or "Bullitt" feel to it. And then....THEN....when it really gets dangerous for 007, when you DON'T expect it at all, at the very very end of the chase, 007 frikkin' ejects himself out! BAMMM!

    You....actually don't see it coming. I have been thinking about other ideas as well for the car chase. Something new that hasn't been done before. I did like how Samuel L. Jackson escaped his car during the car chase in "Captain America: The Winter Soldier":

    But even that....really borders fantasy, how much realistic it feels though. And even that scene reminds me a lot of Bond's BMW 7-series in TND. So, after 50 years of action films, there's already too much stuff for reference to stay fully original.


    One could also opt for "nothing" at all. Just the car chase, Bond driving in the river, Bond trying to escape from a car ready to be drowned (which was done terrifically in "Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol". Great small role in that scene of Tom Wilkinson though:

    But by doing it this way, you're actually copying that very scene from "Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol"


    Regarding "SPECTRE", I don't think it will feel particularly "funny" or Brosnan-esque "cheesy". I'm convinced the seriousness, the realistic feel of the overall car chase will be dominant. And also, do not forget that adding a car chase, no matter how great, how realistic it is, will never be quite an original, unique thing anymore. You can only re-invent it in such a way with as manny creative skills as possible. But movies like "Goldfinger" and "Bullitt" already did it. They set the templates.
  • PanchitoPistolesPanchitoPistoles 2.0
    edited March 2015 Posts: 4,619
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    First you have this basically terrific car chase, which is truly about Bond's driving skills, which lasts very long (7 mins), and which really has a cool, realistic "Ronin" or "Bullitt" feel to it.
    What makes you think that most of the chase will be realistic, and have a "Ronin" or "Bullitt" feel to it?
  • aaron819aaron819 Switzerland
    Posts: 1,208
    Kamran_Shah wrote: »
    aaron819 wrote: »
    Kamran_Shah wrote: »
    Just wondering, did they actually film the sequence where
    Bond ejects himself from the car and lands on the Ponte Sisto?
    Thanks for letting me know!

    @Kamran_Shah I don't know if they filmed the actual
    eject
    but I know they filmed the
    parachute scene

    Thanks @aaron819, much appreciated!
    Did they actually film a real parachute jump onto the bridge, or did they just stage the "landing"? Would be a bit of a disappointment, if it wasn't filmed for real...

    @Kamran_Shah
    It was done for real the parachute "landing"
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    First you have this basically terrific car chase, which is truly about Bond's driving skills, which lasts very long (7 mins), and which really has a cool, realistic "Ronin" or "Bullitt" feel to it.
    What makes you think that most of the chase will be realistic, and have a "Ronin" or "Bullitt" feel to it?
    Because from what I saw the actual car chase will be devoid of any gadgets at all, UNTIL the moment Bond's DB10 lands in the water. This wasn't the case with all previous Bond car chases. Think of "GF", "TSWLM", "TLD" and "TND". Even in "QOS" that truck had a ramming pole. Perhaps the only longer-lasting car chase that really relied on driving skills was the car stock chase in "OHMSS" and the 2CV chase in "FYEO".
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    chipsticks wrote: »
    fred_north Starting our night on the 007 here in Roma with the Shotover K1 capturing some epic stuff...
    Be ready to see it next November 2015.
    @shotovercamera @airbushelicoptersofficial @verticalmag
    #helicopterpilot #hollywoodpilot #007movie #stuntpilot #safetyfirst #filmpilot #instagramaviation #aerialfilming #as350 #bondmovie #k1 #areyouin #thegamehaschanged #pilotlife #romeatnight 13h



    10665918_1458875854402448_540465429_n.jpg

    http://websta.me/p/938712757756276997_53598115

    When did the aerial unit (3rd unit) film this @chipsticks ?

  • aaron819aaron819 Switzerland
    edited March 2015 Posts: 1,208
    PDJamesBond wrote: »
    Gustav Graves, thank you so much for posting and updating the shooting schedule.
    I’m curious, though: isn’t there more filming to be done in London? I’m thinking particularly of the helicopter finale on Westminster Bridge. I can’t imagine that it would all be done at Pinewood – they must have at least a day or two of exteriors to shoot.

    I’m mainly asking because my father, brother, and sister-in-law are traveling to London the last week of April and they didn’t know if they would be lucky enough to see any SPECTRE filming while there.

    !!!THIS IS THE PRODUCTION TIMELINE SPOILER TAGS IMMEDIATELY!!!
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    edited March 2015 Posts: 11,119
    PDJamesBond wrote: »
    Gustav Graves, thank you so much for posting and updating the shooting schedule.

    I’m curious, though: isn’t there more filming to be done in London? I’m thinking particularly
    of the helicopter finale on Westminster Bridge
    . I can’t imagine that it would all be done at Pinewood – they must have at least a day or two of exteriors to shoot.

    I’m mainly asking because my father, brother, and sister-in-law are traveling to London the last week of April and they didn’t know if they would be lucky enough to see any SPECTRE filming while there.

    Can u please put "
    helicopter finale
    " between spoiler tags. I know, I know, I already made many mistakes myself, but I always try..... :-).

    In all honesty, I don't really know. So far it seems it will happen at the end? During or after shooting in Morrocco? Anyone?
  • Seven_Point_Six_FiveSeven_Point_Six_Five Southern California
    Posts: 1,257
    Err on the side of caution, people. When in doubt, use spoiler tags.
  • JCRendleJCRendle
    Posts: 1,552
    @aaron819 can you edit your quote too please
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    Not only that, I think it'll cause, like with other key moments in Bond history (Bond skiing down the cliff in "TSWLM") major cheers in cinema next November. Pretty damn sure of it ;-).
    Major cheers, no doubt. In the same way One Direction get major cheers when they spoon feed their fans the same thing they've heard, but in a different package. The general audience enjoy familiarity. I prefer originality in these situations.

    As for being up there, I don't see how riffing on something already iconic can then join the thing it's riffing on in those upper echelons of Bond moments. I just don't see it.

    The thing I'm excited for is the chase itself and seeing things I've not seen before.

    Regard the video, I can show you similar for an invisible car. Doesn't make it a good idea.


    What I do like about how it is executed in "SPECTRE" is this:
    First you have this basically terrific car chase, which is truly about Bond's driving skills, which lasts very long (7 mins), and which really has a cool, realistic "Ronin" or "Bullitt" feel to it. And then....THEN....when it really gets dangerous for 007, when you DON'T expect it at all, at the very very end of the chase, 007 frikkin' ejects himself out! BAMMM!

    You....actually don't see it coming. I have been thinking about other ideas as well for the car chase. Something new that hasn't been done before. I did like how Samuel L. Jackson escaped his car during the car chase in "Captain America: The Winter Soldier":

    But even that....really borders fantasy, how much realistic it feels though. And even that scene reminds me a lot of Bond's BMW 7-series in TND. So, after 50 years of action films, there's already too much stuff for reference to stay fully original.


    One could also opt for "nothing" at all. Just the car chase, Bond driving in the river, Bond trying to escape from a car ready to be drowned (which was done terrifically in "Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol". Great small role in that scene of Tom Wilkinson though:

    But by doing it this way, you're actually copying that very scene from "Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol"


    Regarding "SPECTRE", I don't think it will feel particularly "funny" or Brosnan-esque "cheesy". I'm convinced the seriousness, the realistic feel of the overall car chase will be dominant. And also, do not forget that adding a car chase, no matter how great, how realistic it is, will never be quite an original, unique thing anymore. You can only re-invent it in such a way with as manny creative skills as possible. But movies like "Goldfinger" and "Bullitt" already did it. They set the templates.

    I'm simply talking about the
    ejector seat. If you want to convince me that's original, go ahead, but you'd be talking nonsense.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    First you have this basically terrific car chase, which is truly about Bond's driving skills, which lasts very long (7 mins), and which really has a cool, realistic "Ronin" or "Bullitt" feel to it.
    What makes you think that most of the chase will be realistic, and have a "Ronin" or "Bullitt" feel to it?
    Because from what I saw the actual car chase will be devoid of any gadgets at all, UNTIL the moment Bond's DB10 lands in the water. This wasn't the case with all previous Bond car chases. Think of "GF", "TSWLM", "TLD" and "TND". Even in "QOS" that truck had a ramming pole. Perhaps the only longer-lasting car chase that really relied on driving skills was the car stock chase in "OHMSS" and the 2CV chase in "FYEO".
    From what I've seen and read it appears to have several, although Bond doesn't know it.
  • RogueAgentRogueAgent
    Posts: 12,526
    It is great to see a lot of fellow excited posters on here! :D I also want to say thank you to you all for the use of SPOILER tags. I have not clicked on any of them and agree that I too will be looking forward to the next video blog whenever it is released? :-bd
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    RC7 wrote: »
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    Not only that, I think it'll cause, like with other key moments in Bond history (Bond skiing down the cliff in "TSWLM") major cheers in cinema next November. Pretty damn sure of it ;-).
    Major cheers, no doubt. In the same way One Direction get major cheers when they spoon feed their fans the same thing they've heard, but in a different package. The general audience enjoy familiarity. I prefer originality in these situations.

    As for being up there, I don't see how riffing on something already iconic can then join the thing it's riffing on in those upper echelons of Bond moments. I just don't see it.

    The thing I'm excited for is the chase itself and seeing things I've not seen before.

    Regard the video, I can show you similar for an invisible car. Doesn't make it a good idea.


    What I do like about how it is executed in "SPECTRE" is this:
    First you have this basically terrific car chase, which is truly about Bond's driving skills, which lasts very long (7 mins), and which really has a cool, realistic "Ronin" or "Bullitt" feel to it. And then....THEN....when it really gets dangerous for 007, when you DON'T expect it at all, at the very very end of the chase, 007 frikkin' ejects himself out! BAMMM!

    You....actually don't see it coming. I have been thinking about other ideas as well for the car chase. Something new that hasn't been done before. I did like how Samuel L. Jackson escaped his car during the car chase in "Captain America: The Winter Soldier":

    But even that....really borders fantasy, how much realistic it feels though. And even that scene reminds me a lot of Bond's BMW 7-series in TND. So, after 50 years of action films, there's already too much stuff for reference to stay fully original.


    One could also opt for "nothing" at all. Just the car chase, Bond driving in the river, Bond trying to escape from a car ready to be drowned (which was done terrifically in "Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol". Great small role in that scene of Tom Wilkinson though:

    But by doing it this way, you're actually copying that very scene from "Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol"


    Regarding "SPECTRE", I don't think it will feel particularly "funny" or Brosnan-esque "cheesy". I'm convinced the seriousness, the realistic feel of the overall car chase will be dominant. And also, do not forget that adding a car chase, no matter how great, how realistic it is, will never be quite an original, unique thing anymore. You can only re-invent it in such a way with as manny creative skills as possible. But movies like "Goldfinger" and "Bullitt" already did it. They set the templates.

    I'm simply talking about the
    ejector seat. If you want to convince me that's original, go ahead, but you'd be talking nonsense.
    Ooowh no, it isn't original. But so isn't the inclusion of an entire car chase. The very presence of a car chase isn't original either. I also mentioned a few examples of how it could be done instead ("Captain America: The Winter Soldier", car chase Washington DC; "Mission: Impossible - GP", Hunt escaping sinking car, no gadgets). But even if you follow that example, you're basically copying stuff as well, making it without a doubt unoriginal as well.
  • RC7RC7
    edited March 2015 Posts: 10,512
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    Not only that, I think it'll cause, like with other key moments in Bond history (Bond skiing down the cliff in "TSWLM") major cheers in cinema next November. Pretty damn sure of it ;-).
    Major cheers, no doubt. In the same way One Direction get major cheers when they spoon feed their fans the same thing they've heard, but in a different package. The general audience enjoy familiarity. I prefer originality in these situations.

    As for being up there, I don't see how riffing on something already iconic can then join the thing it's riffing on in those upper echelons of Bond moments. I just don't see it.

    The thing I'm excited for is the chase itself and seeing things I've not seen before.

    Regard the video, I can show you similar for an invisible car. Doesn't make it a good idea.


    What I do like about how it is executed in "SPECTRE" is this:
    First you have this basically terrific car chase, which is truly about Bond's driving skills, which lasts very long (7 mins), and which really has a cool, realistic "Ronin" or "Bullitt" feel to it. And then....THEN....when it really gets dangerous for 007, when you DON'T expect it at all, at the very very end of the chase, 007 frikkin' ejects himself out! BAMMM!

    You....actually don't see it coming. I have been thinking about other ideas as well for the car chase. Something new that hasn't been done before. I did like how Samuel L. Jackson escaped his car during the car chase in "Captain America: The Winter Soldier":

    But even that....really borders fantasy, how much realistic it feels though. And even that scene reminds me a lot of Bond's BMW 7-series in TND. So, after 50 years of action films, there's already too much stuff for reference to stay fully original.


    One could also opt for "nothing" at all. Just the car chase, Bond driving in the river, Bond trying to escape from a car ready to be drowned (which was done terrifically in "Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol". Great small role in that scene of Tom Wilkinson though:

    But by doing it this way, you're actually copying that very scene from "Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol"


    Regarding "SPECTRE", I don't think it will feel particularly "funny" or Brosnan-esque "cheesy". I'm convinced the seriousness, the realistic feel of the overall car chase will be dominant. And also, do not forget that adding a car chase, no matter how great, how realistic it is, will never be quite an original, unique thing anymore. You can only re-invent it in such a way with as manny creative skills as possible. But movies like "Goldfinger" and "Bullitt" already did it. They set the templates.

    I'm simply talking about the
    ejector seat. If you want to convince me that's original, go ahead, but you'd be talking nonsense.
    Ooowh no, it isn't original. But so isn't the inclusion of an entire car chase. The very presence of a car chase isn't original either. I also mentioned a few examples of how it could be done instead ("Captain America: The Winter Soldier", car chase Washington DC; "Mission: Impossible - GP", Hunt escaping sinking car, no gadgets). But even if you follow that example, you're basically copying stuff as well, making it without a doubt unoriginal as well.
    Well then, by that logic, you're just saying 'making a film isn't original'. Is it that hard to grasp that taking a specific iconic moment from the past and reinventing it is the opposite of originality? DAD did it, now SP is doing it. However good the car chase is, however inventive they are with it, this momemt is neither inventive, nor original. It's not playing with a trope, it's simply copying an image, a moment. Similar to if they used the Union Jack parachute again. I don't think it's much to ask the producers for a little invention and less crowd-pleasing. The chase doesn't have to end with this, but it was clearly built around it. I'd much prefer something not seen in a Bond, even if it's not a 'boom' type finale, let the chase speak for itself ala Ronin or Bullitt.

  • chipstickschipsticks NOT on TheDanielCraigForum where they think know Daniel Craig personally and Léa and Monica are ugly
    Posts: 560
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    chipsticks wrote: »
    fred_north Starting our night on the 007 here in Roma with the Shotover K1 capturing some epic stuff...
    Be ready to see it next November 2015.
    @shotovercamera @airbushelicoptersofficial @verticalmag
    #helicopterpilot #hollywoodpilot #007movie #stuntpilot #safetyfirst #filmpilot #instagramaviation #aerialfilming #as350 #bondmovie #k1 #areyouin #thegamehaschanged #pilotlife #romeatnight 13h



    10665918_1458875854402448_540465429_n.jpg

    http://websta.me/p/938712757756276997_53598115

    When did the aerial unit (3rd unit) film this @chipsticks ?


    I guess in the past 2-4 days

  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    chipsticks wrote: »
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    chipsticks wrote: »
    fred_north Starting our night on the 007 here in Roma with the Shotover K1 capturing some epic stuff...
    Be ready to see it next November 2015.
    @shotovercamera @airbushelicoptersofficial @verticalmag
    #helicopterpilot #hollywoodpilot #007movie #stuntpilot #safetyfirst #filmpilot #instagramaviation #aerialfilming #as350 #bondmovie #k1 #areyouin #thegamehaschanged #pilotlife #romeatnight 13h



    10665918_1458875854402448_540465429_n.jpg

    http://websta.me/p/938712757756276997_53598115

    When did the aerial unit (3rd unit) film this @chipsticks ?


    I guess in the past 2-4 days

    Can you give me more confirmation on that? I'd like to add it in the shooting schedule.
Sign In or Register to comment.