SPECTRE Production Timeline

1558559561563564870

Comments

  • Posts: 1,552
    I love how they're making this out to be unusual. Most filming locations come with restrictions and concessions, especially when tax incentives are involved. They're just seeing an easy story that may get some interest and they're making it this huge thing, when it's nothing out of the ordinary.
  • StanKobra wrote: »
    CAUISw8WAAA-O9O.jpg:large

    That is a nice poster of Daniel Craig. Evokes memories of Roger Moore in Live And Let Die. Nice piece of nostalgia. I do hope the new movie is not littered with references to the past though. It gets boring. How many times can we be reminded that James Bond drives an Aston Martin DB5 after all. Less is more.

  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    That is a nice poster of Daniel Craig. Evokes memories of Roger Moore in Live And Let Die. Nice piece of nostalgia. I do hope the new movie is not littered with references to the past though. It gets boring. How many times can we be reminded that James Bond drives an Aston Martin DB5 after all. Less is more.

    Amen to that, Sir.
  • RC7 wrote: »
    That is a nice poster of Daniel Craig. Evokes memories of Roger Moore in Live And Let Die. Nice piece of nostalgia. I do hope the new movie is not littered with references to the past though. It gets boring. How many times can we be reminded that James Bond drives an Aston Martin DB5 after all. Less is more.

    Amen to that, Sir.

    Thank you. With James Bond in a less familiar attire is it possible that he will share more in common with live and let die. James Bond does not wear a tuxedo in live and let die. Will it be the same in spectre I wonder. Whilst not my favourite James Bond. Daniel Craig has grown on me during his tenure. No-one will ever beat Sean Connery though.
  • Big_GeeBig_Gee Wales
    Posts: 24
    I wonder if the teaser image will be the one which will be displayed at the Carlton Hotel in Cannes during the Film Festival in May......
  • edited March 2015 Posts: 11,119
    RC7 wrote: »
    Don't forget, photography is an art too (Michael Wilson knows that). And I think this new teaser poster completely nails it. Wun-der-ful bit of photography. Yes, perhaps there was some photoshopping done on it, but nowhere as obvious as with the teaser poster from CR (Allthough I still love that one) and the final full-sheet posters of QOS.

    What you get is a man staring at you, with tons of self-assurance.

    With the CR teaser the Photoshopping added tone and atmosphere. With this image it makes DC look a little more like his digital double from the film, or even a video game. It has a slight 'Eau de toilette' feel to it. I'm also not convinced it's a 'wonderful' bit of photography. The more I look at it the more it looks like he's squatting, there's something awkward in his stance. I'd like to see the alternative stances from the shoot. I think the poster will work effectively, as SF did. One thing I do wish from this point is to see less overt references to previous films, actors, etc. Let DC set his own style.

    I don't know an example of a Bond teaser poster that didn't work well. All of them contributed to creation of brand awareness and were fuelling public interest in the film. I agree that there's a slight "Calvin Klein"-vibe to it, but then again....the character James Bond 007 is a style icon himself.

    Moreover, I do think the photoshopping adds a distinct stylish, elegant, though deadly atmosphere to the teaser poster. No casino-vibe, but certainly an "I'm on her Majesty's mission, and I do it in style!"-vibe. The revenge-part seems to be gone. Which also corresponds to what Sam Mendes said: "Bond is now on a mission, from the start".

    Photoshopping has always caused some controversy with the Daniel Craig (teaser) poster. It has been done with the CR-teaser, more succesfully. For me, it also works fine with this SPECTRE-teaser. But, in my opinion, the photoshopping didn't quite work with the QOS-teaser:
    quantumofsolace-poster2-full2.jpg

    But that has also to do with the fact that Bond in an elegant Tom Ford suit, holding a big machine gun doesn't really work. It is contradictory. Like Eggsy (Kingsman) in a double-breasted suit.

    Regarding the turtleneck...I love it. I said before that Bond constantly wearing a suit in "Skyfall" seemed to be out of place. In my opinion I was hoping more for a "spy-at-work outfit". I can see Bond running in this outfit in Whitehall, just not like it was done in "Skyfall". For me that looked like one big forced showcase of suits (Although I did like the slim-fit, cut-to-the-bone approach).

    Also a nice detail, Bond's / Q's signature Walther PPK/S with build-in palm sensor seems to have returned. Now that's what I call a nice reference. Not to non-Craig films, but a reference that adds to the continuity, be referring to "Skyfall".

  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Regarding the turtleneck...I love it. I said before that Bond constantly wearing a suit in "Skyfall" seemed to be out of place. In my opinion I was hoping more for a "spy-at-work outfit". I can see Bond running in this outfit in Whitehall, just not like it was done in "Skyfall". For me that looked like one big forced showcase of suits (Although I did like the slim-fit, cut-to-the-bone approach).

    I like him in dark colours, it would've been nice for it not be so close to Rog in LALD, though. Just for the sake of originality. I prefer his look in the first still we got. He looks good in this, but like I say, it screams Rog to me.
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    I would always have 007 in a suit. However, as people have said above it harks back to LALD (DC's favourite Bond film incidently).
  • Posts: 6,601
    Ilario Citton @ ilariobond · 1h 1 hour ago
    # SPECTRE Thursday '19/03 Press Conference in Citta' of Mexico.
  • RC7RC7
    edited March 2015 Posts: 10,512
    suavejmf wrote: »
    I would always have 007 in a suit. However, as people have said above it harks back to LALD (DC's favourite Bond film incidently).

    I would have Bond in a suit in action scenes too, but only if stems naturally from the situation. SF PTS is strange as he's technically out in the field. I do think the suit is a distinguishing factor in the visual portrayal of Bond and I reckon we may see some suited action at some stage in SP.

    This look is Bond doing cosplay of Bond, which is quite weird the more I think about it. I just wish we weren't having discussions about how things in this film remind us of others. Seems to be a recurring topic of discussion thus far.
  • edited March 2015 Posts: 11,119
    RC7 wrote: »
    Regarding the turtleneck...I love it. I said before that Bond constantly wearing a suit in "Skyfall" seemed to be out of place. In my opinion I was hoping more for a "spy-at-work outfit". I can see Bond running in this outfit in Whitehall, just not like it was done in "Skyfall". For me that looked like one big forced showcase of suits (Although I did like the slim-fit, cut-to-the-bone approach).

    I like him in dark colours, it would've been nice for it not be so close to Rog in LALD, though. Just for the sake of originality. I prefer his look in the first still we got. He looks good in this, but like I say, it screams Rog to me.

    It doesn't scream "Roger" to me. It screams Daniel Craig.....in which one find subtle references to "LALD". I think no matter what we do, especially here on the forums we are "comparison addicts". It will always be part of these discussions. And it's logical if you have a reference view of 53 years James Bond and 23 Bond films. It's normal. And it won't go away, even if all of our wishes not to include references - @RC7 ;-) - are heard.

    That image of Bond you are referring too, made in Austria, was branded "a true George Lazenby reference, with those circular goggles". Bond wearing that blue parka jacket in Austria evoked "Aahh, it screams Willy Bogner/Roger Moore FYEO"!

    Really, we can also overreact :-P.
  • Posts: 1,552
    RC7 wrote: »
    This look is Bond doing cosplay of Bond, which is quite weird the more I think about it
    Couldn't this be said every time Bond dons a Dinner Jacket?
  • RC7RC7
    edited March 2015 Posts: 10,512
    RC7 wrote: »
    Regarding the turtleneck...I love it. I said before that Bond constantly wearing a suit in "Skyfall" seemed to be out of place. In my opinion I was hoping more for a "spy-at-work outfit". I can see Bond running in this outfit in Whitehall, just not like it was done in "Skyfall". For me that looked like one big forced showcase of suits (Although I did like the slim-fit, cut-to-the-bone approach).

    I like him in dark colours, it would've been nice for it not be so close to Rog in LALD, though. Just for the sake of originality. I prefer his look in the first still we got. He looks good in this, but like I say, it screams Rog to me.

    It doesn't scream "Roger" to me. It screams Daniel Craig.....in which one find subtle references to "LALD". I think no matter what we do, especially here on the forums we are "comparison addicts".

    That image of Bond you are referring too, made in Austria, was branded "a true George Lazenby reference, with those circular goggles". Bond wearing that blue parka jacket in Austria evoked "Aahh, it screams Willy Bogner/Roger Moore FYEO"!

    Really, we can also overreact :-P.

    Subtle references? It's the same look. He doesn't look like GL or Bogner in the Austria shots.

    If it were 'subtle', I don't think articles like this would be surfacing...

    https://uk.yahoo.com/movies/daniel-craig-channels-roger-moore-in-first-spectre-113884938501.html

  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy My Secret Lair
    Posts: 13,384
    With so many films behind them, there are bound to be similarities in clothing
    etc. Doesn't mean they're deliberate, as I sure many in the Bond camp, don't watch
    The films as closely or as often as we do! :))
  • Posts: 15,106
    RC7 wrote: »
    Regarding the turtleneck...I love it. I said before that Bond constantly wearing a suit in "Skyfall" seemed to be out of place. In my opinion I was hoping more for a "spy-at-work outfit". I can see Bond running in this outfit in Whitehall, just not like it was done in "Skyfall". For me that looked like one big forced showcase of suits (Although I did like the slim-fit, cut-to-the-bone approach).

    I like him in dark colours, it would've been nice for it not be so close to Rog in LALD, though. Just for the sake of originality. I prefer his look in the first still we got. He looks good in this, but like I say, it screams Rog to me.

    As the movies have been around since 1962, it is difficult to be entirely original, especially when it comes to functional clothes. I for one, rather enjoy the continuity it brings. Bond wore something in TB and LALD, at least. And why not?
  • Posts: 11,119
    Ludovico wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    Regarding the turtleneck...I love it. I said before that Bond constantly wearing a suit in "Skyfall" seemed to be out of place. In my opinion I was hoping more for a "spy-at-work outfit". I can see Bond running in this outfit in Whitehall, just not like it was done in "Skyfall". For me that looked like one big forced showcase of suits (Although I did like the slim-fit, cut-to-the-bone approach).

    I like him in dark colours, it would've been nice for it not be so close to Rog in LALD, though. Just for the sake of originality. I prefer his look in the first still we got. He looks good in this, but like I say, it screams Rog to me.

    As the movies have been around since 1962, it is difficult to be entirely original, especially when it comes to functional clothes. I for one, rather enjoy the continuity it brings. Bond wore something in TB and LALD, at least. And why not?

    Exactly this point I have been making quite a few times on here. I fully agree.
  • RC7RC7
    edited March 2015 Posts: 10,512
    DrGorner wrote: »
    With so many films behind them, there are bound to be similarities in clothing
    etc. Doesn't mean they're deliberate, as I sure many in the Bond camp, don't watch
    The films as closely or as often as we do! :))

    It's clearly deliberate. Mendes and DC love LALD. You're telling me Dan rocking up on a poster looking pretty much identical to Moore in LALD is not a conscious decision?
    Ludovico wrote: »
    As the movies have been around since 1962, it is difficult to be entirely original, especially when it comes to functional clothes. I for one, rather enjoy the continuity it brings. Bond wore something in TB and LALD, at least. And why not?

    He doesn't have to look identical to Moore, though? They could throw in a few flourishes to differentiate the look. Even the Brosnan era managed it.
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy My Secret Lair
    Posts: 13,384
    Connery wore something similar in GF and TB, switch the turtle neck
    For a shirt and that's Moore in MR and of course Brosnan dress in Black for DAD.
    I do agree, it is A very strong homage to LALD. Although for months I've read many
    Posts about how it was a remake of OHMSS suddenly we're getting a LALD influence.
    So standby for Bond being chased by Crocodiles on skis ! :))
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    JCRendle wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    This look is Bond doing cosplay of Bond, which is quite weird the more I think about it
    Couldn't this be said every time Bond dons a Dinner Jacket?

    It's an accepted trope of the series. If Dan turned up in blue bathing suit ala Connery in GF I'd be equally puzzled. What I'm trying to say and have been regard Mendes' creative decisions at times is STOP COPYING STUFF FROM WHEN YOU WERE A KID. It's just boring.
  • chipstickschipsticks NOT on TheDanielCraigForum where they think know Daniel Craig personally and Léa and Monica are ugly
    Posts: 560

    marianamc1 La última y nos vamos 10h

    image: https://igcdn-photos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xaf1/t51.2885-19/10919692_788964134528521_1803225097_a.jpg
    marianamc1 #mextagram #mexigers #asiviveelcentro #ilovedf #donceles #mementomori #mexico_maravilloso #mexico 10h

    11007809_864326626992371_1441926119_n.jpg



    http://websta.me/p/943143033011164927_255475244
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    edited March 2015 Posts: 11,139
    No-one will ever beat Sean Connery though.

    QFT.
  • edited March 2015 Posts: 1,552
    RC7 wrote: »
    What I'm trying to say and have been regard Mendes' creative decisions at times is STOP COPYING STUFF FROM WHEN YOU WERE A KID. It's just boring.
    You may dislike it, but it doesn't mean everyone does. When the DB5 was unveiled in Skyfall, rather than finding it boring, a cheer went up in the audience. Similar to the nod to Dr No in Casino Royale, when DC did a Ursula Andress, coming out of the sea - it wasn't boring.

    I don't see any problems with Bond films nodding to their predecessors - there's over 50 years of history, I'm all for the films paying respect to the past.
  • SarkSark Guangdong, PRC
    Posts: 1,138
    I'm amazed that anyone would try and say this isn't a deliberate (or at least conscious) homage to LALD. Just because not everyone working for EON is a huge Bond nerd doesn't mean that no one would have noticed the similarities-particularly Craig and Mendes, who seemingly are big LALD fans.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    JCRendle wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    What I'm trying to say and have been regard Mendes' creative decisions at times is STOP COPYING STUFF FROM WHEN YOU WERE A KID. It's just boring.
    You may dislike it, but it doesn't mean everyone does. When the DB5 was unveiled in Skyfall, rather than finding it boring, a cheer went up in the audience. Similar to the no to Dr No in Casino Royale, when DC did a Ursula Andress, coming out of the sea - it wasn't boring.

    I don't see any problems with Bond films nodding to their predecessors - there's over 50 years of history, I'm all for the films paying respect to the past.

    We totally disagree on this point, then. It's a modern fad that has forced its way into popular culture over the past twenty years to guarantee bums on seats and cash at the expense of creativity (See - Millenium Falcon). If in doubt 'do that thing they liked last time'. It's not a problem I've had with Bond films before, but the DC era pitched itself as mould-breaking and risky and to all extents the first two delivered on that. I just think they've lost their balls a bit. I'm not pinning this all on this LALD cosplay, DC looks good, but it's symptomatic of certain things Mendes is doing with the franchise. Potentially taking a risk with characters, but covering his arse with visuals and nods. The DB5 didn't need to be in SF, period. It was in purely for nostalgia and for gormless members of the public to go, 'Ooh that's that car what was in that other film!'. Meh.
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy My Secret Lair
    Posts: 13,384
    Pitty they didn't give him the .44 Magnum. :)
  • For fear of getting my head bitten off, wouldn't it be better to discuss the teaser poster and Daniel's wardrobe in those threads rather than the production one? Just a suggestion.... :-*
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy My Secret Lair
    Posts: 13,384
    I can see your logic. ;)
  • Posts: 270
    So it looks like the press conference has been moved to Thursday? Based on what Ilario tweeted.
Sign In or Register to comment.