It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
It looks like it. The registration number on the side is G-LCPL which leads to an Aerospatiale AS-365N-2 Dauphin 2, same family of the Harbin Z-9:helis.com/database/cn/27218/
Daniel really is the Bond in the rain.
I took a few photos but not as good as what is circling. I recorded this video footage which everyone's favourite Brazilian fan has uploaded:
Lots more photos in the article but here are a couple
Craig looks very cool and Lea’s look is very reminiscent of a 1960’s Bond girl.
One large observation; there seems to be a lot of handheld camera work on the film. I’m not just talking about these recent pictures but from a lot of what we’ve seen from the production so far. Mendes made a conscious decision to move away from the ‘shaky’ cam style of both Bourne and QOS with SF; instead choosing to shoot the film in a more traditional way. In fact, Mendes stated that there is only one scene in the film that a handheld camera is used, which is the sequence in M’s apartment after Bond has been missing for three months. Mendes’s intention being that the loose feel would make the meeting feel more intimate and also suggest to the audience that Bond and M are on rocky terrain and attempting to rebuild their relationship. It’s interesting to see that we may be seeing more use of the device throughout SP. If you look at some the videoblogs you can see the camera being used in sequences set inside M’s office, etc; which I find very interesting. Clearly there is going to be a clear divide from Deakins’s camerawork in SF and Hoytema’s this time out.
Technically they pass both buildings (the pale block with the trees in front in that first video above is MI5). But they probably don't know that and they also said SP is DC's 5th film and that a stuntman did most of the boat scenes which wasn't actually the case so sloppy journalism all round!
Is only around six months away. :D
I'll answer this with your own motto: Keep calm and wait for Spectre!
I don't mind as they are emulating the best.
With over 20 Bond films, as well as thousands of other action movies, nearly every action scene would be evocative of something that's come before it - trying to do something new without being too outlandish or stretching disbelief gets increasingly difficult the more films you produce.
http://news.sky.com/story/1485838/bond-back-in-london-for-more-spectre-stunts
Dan and Lea look like they are keeping each other spirits up. Hopefully that transfers to screen.
I have not read the leaked script this is my own thoughts and please nobody click reveal then post a comment saying this should be in the spoilers topic.