It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
there shouldn't be a dot right after the "s"
I think from what we know SP will see Bond and M building a relationship of mutual respect. Let's not forget that in the novels (and sometimes in the movies, to a lesser extend), both characters had their moments of tension.
The acronym is ridiculous. A terrorist organisation called "Spectre" is intimidating sounding enough as it is, you don't need to reverse engineer a convoluted acronym to justify it.
If it's any consolation it looks like the modern 2015 iteration of the organisation has dropped the old 50's style acronym. They are not SPECTRE in the new film, instead, they are simply Spectre.
Both IMDb and Wikipedia list the film as 'Spectre' and (especially with IMDb) they get this info from the studios.
MOD EDIT: Spoiler tags added - possible SPECTRE spoiler.
Dublo
You know very well that there is a thread (and only one thread) to discuss spoilers of this nature and you even posted that without using spoiler tags. I've added them. Don't do this again.
Okay, now THIS I call spoiler-ing! Thanks a lot X(
How is this a spoiler? Isn't it obvious? Anyways I'm pretty tired of people calling it SPECTRE anyways, the latter which was mentioned makes a monumental amount of sense.
Because there is a clear difference between the Production Timeline (where leaks are not to be discussed) and the Leaks Thread (where they are to be discussed). The fact that people still enter this thread to discuss the leaks blows me away.
The whole "Isn't it obvious?" question is a poor excuse, really. Spoilers are going to be "obvious" once they're revealed. Just like SF: it's obvious that M dies because I know she dies. Thus, when someone reads the leaked script, spoilers are obvious to them. Either way, keep it where it belongs, not here.
I get your point but
I think people are placing too much weight on this respect thing for M. First and foremost Malory isn't Sir Miles. Secondly, to overdue holiday line is no worse than any quip or back chat Bond (Brosnan and Craig) gave Dench's M. Thirdly, we don't know how the scene plays out; Malory may give Bond a serious bollocking...or not. Malory maybe the new M and Bond will respect his title but simultaneously the first impression relationship was already established in SF and their little back and forth repartee about staying dead set the tone of how Bond and Malory interact with each other. People need to put things into context instead of simply identifying the new M as a man and therefore it's a, yes sir, no sir, three bags full sir dynamic Bond all of a sudden needs to go back to. The overdue holiday line was fine and keeping in with Bond's character and the relationship dynamic he has with Malory.
His leading lady! Rachel Weisz gives Bond girls a run for their money in classic black bikini as she enjoys family holiday in Menorca with husband Daniel Craig
26 July 2015
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3175065/Rachel-Weisz-shows-bikin-body-onfamily-holiday-Daniel-Craig.html
I agree, and no Bond movie should ever be titled "Blofeld". Ever.
He doesn't have to be Bond between takes.
At least not a Mets cap :/ ...and definately a blue shirt ...very blue ..shirt ..blue hippie shirt. Yup.