It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Yep , half the stunts only ! Us Bond fans have our pride after all ;)
I don't mind if action is there in a film because in the end its a movie made for entertainment , as long as its executed properly and you get the sense of thrill and excitement. I really don't see a problem. If you want something more monotonous we have it.. its called real life -_-
Bond movie is an escapist movie and the level of escapisim is raised when you get solid action which gets you engrossed and like how you put it 'suspend disbelief'.
That's kind of the #1 reason I am happy Mendes is gone , so hopefully the bar on action can get raised.
Now only if we can get a director who can make sure Craig gets a classy haircut ! :))
This ^
Nobody was complaining about SF having action for the sake of action.
agreed
The reason Skyfall was so successful therefore contributing to the series continuing and be reinvigorated for years to come in a way that none of the Dalton films did, is that they gave the mass public what they wanted, not what a niche group of snotty fans want.
If the series had bowed to the fans every need and whim it would have been dead decades ago, Bond survives because it changes and adapts to suit the time and Skyfall did a tremendous job of giving 007 a welcome shot in the arm that the public reacted to incredibly positively.
Bond is not mine and not yours it is the mass buying public that call the shots and when they stop coming then kiss goodbye to your beloved Bond, I know some of you didn't like it but to hear you talk it was like Sam Mendes took a dump in your front garden.
If you just want Bond to make relatively good boxoffice and not really stack up with the competition just so you can have your own personal tick off list of do's and don't's. Something that the average joe wouldn't give a flying fig about. Those Dalton films ( I personally like them) are not universally accepted as classics like a select group of you see them and making the films that way would be the quickest way to bury the series, Skyfall did embrace Nolan etc but it worked and made the film a tremendous success and those expecting TLD 2 come 2014 are likely to be disappointed, why do you want the series to go backwards instead of forwards, what possible outcome do you expect from this?
Yes the films are made for the public, that's obvious, so I fail to see your point there. Just because the movies are made for the public and because SF was popular with the public and is extremely successful, it doesn't mean this place should just be a giant SF love in. And just because the movies are made for the public and not for Bond nerds, that doesn't mean we can't discuss what we'd like in Bond 24.
Personally I like having different opinions on here. I thought Skyfall was brilliant and Craig's best movie but I enjoy reading posts from people like Getafix who I think make good arguments for not liking it. Yes SF was extremely successful but that doesn't mean we all have to love it.
You prefer Craig to Dalton and you love SF so why not just be happy with that, instead of ranting at people who don't agree with you?
You love to show what a balanced poster you are and are open to other opinions, Getafix is a Daltonite like yourself and pops up to bash SF in mostly every thread he can and use the TD era as his example for what is wrong with the Craig era and personally I'm tired of it, you won't find me jumping in every thread doing this.
I'm just tired of hearing how great the Dalton era is and how those to films were when the series was so good, I liked them but they are as flawed as they are great and Getafix is constantly down on SF so I'm here to stand up for it.
Your goody too shoes routine is rather tiresome.
I'm tired of hearing how shit the Brosnan era is but that's life isn't it. Sometimes the popular opinion isn't your own. Just be happy with what you think.
after QOS, which was overloaded with action, i'm glad we got a film like SF which scaled it down a bit, and reeled things back.. could there have been room for maybe an extra small action piece? probably.. but i couldn't begin to tell you where it could have been fit in to, and make sense with progressing the plot..
but believe me, in Bond 24 i am not opposed to having a little more action.. i think that we can agree on :)>-
Haha, You said it ! :)
In all honestly @haserot , I don't really mind if a movie has less action , Take Cr for example that movie was for the most part based in a Casino and was rather less on action ,But to me the Quality of the action is of the utmost importance. Casino Royale had set the standards on action , it was just so damn intense! Skyfall fell below on that area ,Mendes is very weak when it comes to action in my opinion. I hope the next director will be able to do better !
Even if the grosses are high doesn't necessarily make it a great movie
Avatar is the No.1 grossing movie of all time :)) , You be the judge !
I believe its up to the fans to decide if a movie is good or not and in what area's it falls weak on.
agreed
Moonraker was the highest grossing Bond film for a long time - but it more or less sat at the bottom of everyone's list when ranking Bond films..
Die Another Day was another that grossed a lot of money as well - but it was pure trash..
On Her Majesty's Secret Service wasn't a box office sensation, but it usually ranks among the best Bond films when asked by the fans..
time will be the ultimate judge on Skyfall - and that is something that we cannot predict... i think there is enough there, that it will hold up extremely well for years to come - though it may drop a few pegs in the general consensus 10-15 years down the road... or, it could live on and be regarded as one of the best like GF has for almost half a century..... that is something we'll just have to wait and see..
Moonraker is a solid example that you gave !
I agree completely
Yes, the top ten highest grossing films of all time are mostly pretty awful films IMO. Box office is obviously a great sign of what people enjoy watching at any given moment in history, but it is rarely a guide to whether a film is going to stand the test of time and come to be regarded as a classic. Many of the Hollywood films now seen as classics went practically unnoticed or were seen as flops when they came out. Casablanca. It's a Wonderful Life. OHMSS. Shawshank.
Exactly ,
In my honest opinion , years from now when the hype of Skyfall dies down to nil and hopefully there will be better and greater Bond movies.People will watch it with open minds. That time I expect people to see that the film is inherently flawed.
I have said this multiple times and I'm getting tired of it but here I go again. SF is not at all perfect (in fact there are no perfect films) and it is not my favourite Bond film but it's top 3 for me. I have watched it multiple times by now and honestly I can find new layers and details every time, and my enjoyment only increased.
Don't like SF? Too bad, there is obviously nothing I (or others) can say to change your mind. But be ware, if you are expecting that suddenly the majority of people will "see the light" and start agreeing with you then that is is rubbish I'm afraid you're going to be disappointed.
It does not mean you're dumb! it means we're human , there's absolutely nothing wrong with it, its natural when something is talked about to get caught in the hype .
Look at how the Dalton movies are looked upon then and now is a perfect example but again like haserot said and Getafix repeated, only time will tell.
Skyfail, this is exactly the type of post that causes division here. Sandy say that she wasn't caught in the hype and then you tell that she's wrong, she was caught in the hype and that it's okay.
I loved SF and thought that it was one of the best Bond films ever made. But I wasn't "caught in the hype" any more than I was for any other Bond film. There have been Bond films that were unpopular that I loved, and Bond films that were popular that I didn't like at all. For you to say that you know Sandy's mind better than she does is at best arrogant and pretentious, and at worst insulting and demeaning.
SF has caused a reaction that I've never seen in fans before at the time of a new film's release - some of those who don't like it (but not everyone) feel the need to tell people who like it that they're wrong to do so. They can't accept that people just like it, they need to show people the error of their ways. I'm the first to admit that SF could have done a couple of things better but so could every other Bond film. For those who feel the need to bash SF and the people who like it I could easily find as many flaws, plot holes, or "unrealistic" things in their favourite Bond film as well. The difference is that I won't. Someone disliking SF doesn't make my life any worse, nor does them having a different top ten list of Bond films than I do.
If anyone is "caught up in the hype" it seems to be the people who frantically need to diminish people who like SF...
Well, you certainly have some nerve trying to tell me and others what goes on in our minds. You certainly haven't the slightest clue what you are talking about. That was one of the most patronizing comments I have ever read here.
@thelordflasheart you are absolutely right, I also don't like some of the most popular entries, that should say something about me and you being caught in the hype!
@thelordflashheart,
I wasn't pointing at her ! She has every right to have an opinion !
Please read my comment again
She believed that I felt people caught in the hype were dumb and delusional. As if people should look down on them . So I said there's nothing wrong with getting caught up in the hype I never said she did.
I mentioned clearly in the end 'only time will tell'.
But it's ok for you to say such things about me , when I haven't said a single bad thing to her nor you.
Six years on and after following Quantum Of Solace too, time has taught me the view fans initially have and is an accurate one and proves they're ironically, not deluded, yet this is the group of fans one would expect to be after seeing a new Bond film.
I can't see things changing in the future as there's no "light" to be seen, as much as those who don't agree with the consensus on a film want there to be.
I expect something similar with 'Skyfall'.
SF is such a strange beast. Of my group of friends, family, acquaintances and colleagues the following is relatively consistent.
Those people I would consider non-Bond fans, those that have seen a movie or two and really don't care for them (usually patronising at my expense) love SF.
Those who have a general appreciation for the films are ambivalent, none have suggested it's their favourite, with the majority preferring it to QoS but not CR. There are obviously those who like it and others who don't, but the majority fall squarely in the middle.
The quote I've heard most often - 'Not as good as the hype suggests'.
I'm sure we've all had different experiences over the last few months, the above is pretty much my gauge of that happening around me.
Time will tell where SF lies.
Very interesting @Samuel001. You didn't like CR when it came out? I'm actually surprised by that.
But I agree with everything that's been said. The hype for SF is gone but I still love it and I probably always will. It's a very special film to me and while it has a few flaws (all Bond films do) I don't let them get in the way of a wonderful 2.5 hours of enjoyment
I liked Casino Royale then and now, I just don't hold it in such high regard as many.
yep, I felt pretty much the same with whom so ever I spoke with
As always agree with that last line ;)
I also kind of feel that Cr was the movie that practically everyone liked , I came across only one person who disliked Cr and the general consensus is that's the best ! I hope B24 continues in Cr's footseps