It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Just remember, QoS had ALOT of locations to shoot. One probably worked on location with actors, and one was probably responsible for establishing shots, etc. It always saves time to be able to shoot different scenes in different locations with different actors during a production.
This makes troubling reading.
I do love his films though and even think QOS is very good, it's only real major sin for me is that it followed CR which broke the mould.
I think Forster is best as a small budget art house director. He doesn't seem to manage big blockbusters very well.
And QoS and CR sharing an arc shouldn't be a big deal. There is no official Bond 'mold', and if there was, CR broke it before QoS. Plus, remember if it hadn't been for Lazenby's big-headedness, Diamonds Are Forever likely would have directly followed On Her Majesty's Secret Service.