It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Good to see Bond films ahead of the curve then in treating religion with the respect it deserves long before Dawkins arrived in the scene.
I also think you'll find that in OP the money Bond throws lands in the begging bowl of some random beggar (religion unspecified). If we're going to have a serious discussion then please don't commit the classic crime of the religious and try to twist some perceived 'evidence' just to fit your shaky hypothesis.
As regards your initial post; I think you can read too much into these things. The bible is such an encompassing work that covers so many topics it is possible to find parallels for any subject you care; just as Muslim and Christian fundamentalists twist quotes from the bible to justify blowing up planes or persecuting homosexuals.
For example in LALD we have the virgin, graveyard and death motifs, Bond alone surrounded by beasts a la Daniel in the lions den, I'm pretty sure JW says 'Goddamit' or 'Christ' somewhere along the line, Bond being tied with his arms aloft and dripping blood, Bond undergoing a full body immersion and finally the 'resurrection' of Samedi.
Or how about the extremely poorly scripted DAF? Is the reason it's so awful because Mankiewicz spent most of his time weaving in religious symbolism? Well there's Bond's comment of 'welcome to hell Blofeld', the trinity of Blofelds, Wint & Kidd's comment 'If God had wanted man to fly....', Mrs Whistler hiding the diamonds in a bible, Tiffany saying 'My God', Bond, the ultimate sinner being almost consumed by flames (with religious music in the background). And finally of course the guy at the circus who performs the high fall clearly lands in a Christ like pose and following this Bond's high dive at the end also features him adopt a Christ like pose. Now according to BeatlesSansEarmuffs (re immersion) something happening twice in the same movie is a clear indicator: 'First of all, we have two full-body immersions in water for Bond in the course of the movie -- one in the PTS, and another near the end of the film. Now, one immersion can be meaningless -- but two in the course of one movie?'
At the end of the day it is very easy to try and mould something to fit a theory but reading too deeply into every tiny coincidence.
As regards your latest points regarding morality and Bond being a 'sinner', well, the Vatican horde their ill gotten gains and cover up for paedos whilst all the time professing moral authority. Bond meanwhile kills and watches his soul being eroded in order to protect the rest of us. Remind me who is the sinner again?
When it comes to morality I think I'd agree with Dalts: 'He's a bad lad but he's on the side of good.' Would that one could say something so complimentary about the clergy of all faiths.
Bond has sacrificed his place in heaven (if you believe in such tosh) to protect us and be our saviour. While the moral majority would sneer at his drinking and shagging, it is thanks to Bond giving up the chance of a 'normal life' that allows them to contentedly mow their suburban lawns and raise their 2.4 children in peace, while kidding themselves they are moral by giving the nominal amount to charity and the church that their priest says they need to donate to be assured of their place in 'paradise'.
Ultimately, Bond running down Whitehall doggedly determined to protect Britain is far more spiritually uplifting than anything from a 2000 year old book of fairy tales if you ask me.
And dude, everyone believes in such tosh. Whether it be that God is all powerful, Reagan was a great American President, or margarine is good for you. Believing in tosh is what we do. ;)
http://thebondologistblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/musings-on-james-bond-and-religion.html
I find some of your observations here a tad spurious Draggers; the Property of a Lady quote for example. This is not a religious reference in the conventional sense, merely a quote which happens to come from the bible. It could just have easily have come from the Thousand and One Nights or Grimm's Fairy Tales. It is important to make the distinction in these matters between deliberate religious references and what is just the residual by-product of a Christian upbringing of the sort Fleming was exposed to.
Where I am in agreement is with your closing paragraph and it is this that sums up Bond and religion for me. The only real religion in Bond is what comes from being educated and born in an ostensibly Christian country. In the same way we all say 'God' or 'Jesus Christ what a shower of shit' (when,for example, your team gets turned over 3-1 by Hull) without thinking about it in religious terms because it is just an oath that has been passed down to us through history, it is inevitable that from time to time religious references will crop up in Fleming's work.
Fleming and, by extension Bond, would seem to have the nominal religion of the vast majority - just attending church for births, marriages and deaths. It certainly isn't a part of Bond's life and didn't seem at all a part of Fleming's. They seem more wedded to belief in England and the Empire than any guy with a white beard on a cloud. In fact I tend to consider the numerous George and the Dragon references in terms of Englishness rather than anything religious.
Well, yes OK, Ice. Please be easy on me as it was one of my earlier pieces of Bond writing and is not a complete piece, hence my use of the word 'Musings...' in the title. As such it was all rather contrived perhaps, although one hopefully grows and improves as a writer over time and it's a subject matter that I'd like to return to on my blog at some future point. Still, glad you read it.
I think you're both reading too much into it to be honest - I agree with Wiz; he's put that much more eloquently than I have.
There were 3 immersions in water, btw - getting shot of the train, getting dunked in Scotland and Bond was swimming in Shanghai, just to be ultra perdanctic. :D
Oh, glad to hear that, @royale65! Thanks very much!
Although religion, as well as politics, is toned down to have a broader appeal, it is still there.
Yes, you've hit the nail on the head there, just as attacks on Russian and Chinese Communism were muted/towned down in the film versions of the books of the same name, so too was those that reference religion, although mostly they have been referencing mild Christianity of some strain or other, as well as perhaps other faiths. The point you raise is a very good one though, @Thunderfinger and I'm glad to hear you enjoyed my article and @BeatlesSansEarmuff's OP.
Hastily chosen words on my part, what I meant was that the Bond movies take no religious stance.
Yes, but like John Cox's essay on the YOLT film and its religious subtext, isn't that all just part of the fun of the Bond films? I think it is, but then I write and research on that type of stuff myself, so maybe I'm a tad biased.
Oh, I didn't think that for a minute, @pachazo! I value your contributions to the community very much in fact.
Yes, although in The James Bond Dossier (1965) Kingsley Amis does make reference to Bond's values as being as Christian/Humanist as you could want, though I know that his critical study was largely about the books and didn't dwell very often on the successful film versions.
Sarcasm? Seriously though, I enjoy reading your work; I feared my comment above was patronising.
I am a Christian. I am a lifelong Bond fan. What can I say about the symbolism in Skyfall? Well, for me, I think there is Christian symbolism in Skyfall, sure. But I do not read too much into it, certainly not for having any particular Christian message. The theme of resurrection (which, yes, is the basic foundation of Christianity) is a topic that is interesting to all of mankind, in every culture. Being redeemed, coming back from near death (or death), having the chance to make a new life, etc. Christianity is woven into British history, these past many years, so I don't see the Christian references as jarring or not fitting the story.
I did enjoy Skyfall tremendously, but I was not "hit over the head" so to speak with Christian symbolism to the point where I took extra notice of it while watching the film. But many of the facets presented: loyalty, courage, redemption, getting a second chance at life, endurance, helping/saving others who are in dire circumstances, overcoming impossible odds ... to name a few - those are the beating heart of Skyfall, which mirrors for me personally some of the best elements of England, its people, and also as part of my personal faith.
And if you embrace the theology of saints (both those celebrated and recognized and those who fly under the public radar) these souls might also avoid the purgatory, or advance relatively unfettered. The rest of us will do our time in purgatory as nothing impure can enter heaven. Again from my Christian theological perspective,
all souls require a purification. Scales must be balanced. Penance for sins etc. Bond and every other human being that has walked this planet IM humble theological opinion awaits the same fate. Those that have made effort will have opportunity to advance their soul.
Bond is an honorable man. He fights the good fight. He embodies the theological vision of noble soldier, an honorable profession. In a world where biblical evil does hold sway, the honorable soldier can be a noble, good and necessary profession.
On the other hand I don't believe there is purgatory for the likes of DN, GF etc. They have chosen evil. They embrace it. They are consumed by their own vanities.
I believe we all choose our own destiny. When we die we face a perfect judgement based on the path that we have chosen.
Fleming toyed with these notions of dispensation of the soul in DN, when he mused on the fates of both DN and Quarrel, surmising that they both couldn't possibly be destined for the same place.
As flawed human beings go, Bond IMO is a good egg. If you believe in such things, I think his immortal soul is quite salvageable. He makes effort to embrace the "good." He hasn't sold out to the "evil" as many of his vile adversaries appear to have done.
Bottom line is we are all sinners. But if you believe in the notion of the Christian God, we all choose our own path and we all face a perfect judgement, so it all gets sorted out, no matter what you might actually believe or not believe.
Again from a theological perspective, purgatory isn't a bad place to be. It does mean you are going to heaven, but there is road to hoe first, and some have a longer hoe than others.
Personally I don't think the "kingdom" is reserved only for the "believers" Purgatory I believe yes, is more a theological doctrine of the Catholic Church, not quite embraced by Protestant faith but still I think all Christians can agree on the notion of a perfect divine judgement and that none of us are qualified to elevate or condemn our fellow man. I consign DN to Hades but only because I believe he's chosen that destiny, but I will allow that it is conceivable that he may have had some sort of epiphany as he was choking to death on clouds of bird dung.
Plato touched on this notion in The Republic, in which he concluded,using the Socratic method, that for a man to be just, he must be all-knowing, therefore actual justice is beyond the competence of mortal man. We are not competent to either condemn or elevate to the heavens our fellow traveller.
When you are talking Tolkien or CS Lewis for example though, the Christian theming is by design, but I don't think so with SF, but it does seem to be there.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but 'political correctness' has nothing to do with this. That's me being polite. The general populace aren't obliged to believe works of fiction. In that sense SF and your beliefs are aligned.
Thank Christ (that's me burning along with DN for blasphemy I presume?) for some sanity at last RC7.
Presume 00Beast would think it similarly 'great' were EON to embed elements of the Koran in their films to get people 'thinking about The Word'? Or is that not so desirable?
Obviously, I realize that if such promotion in movies were allowed, it wouldn't be permissable to have a double standard; no, I would not want elements of the Muslim book embedded into movies. For crying out loud, don't take my words out of context.