It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
In that case I'll be tracking them down then! Also, your username derives from Burgess's work which is rather appropriate for this thread!
Something I noticed as well: A Clockwork Orange was published the same year as DN was released.
I'd also really love to hear your views on this article of mine:
http://thebondologistblog.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/anthony-burgess-on-spy-who-loved-me.html
Some thoughts that come to my mind:
-Anthony Burgess was alive when FYEO was released, so I don't think he approved of the movie, not enough to mention it subsequently anyway. If he watched it at all.
-Given that he thought the movies had gone downhill since Goldfinger, my bet is that he wanted something far, far closer to the novels. If he had his way, I think Sean Connery would have remained Bond until circa NSNA, when all the Bond novels would have been adapted... as faithfully as possible. With less action, but probably far more violence, sadism and yes sex. Something that even his script for TSWLM is full of.
-The above is not complete speculation. Burgess had respect for Sean Connery: he wanted him to play the main character of the movie adaption of Beard's Roman Women, which in the end was never made.
-Also, reading Tremor of Intent, one cannot help but notice that the amount of sex and sadism (including a torture scene not unlike the one in CR) in the novel owes a lot to Ian Fleming.
-He also mentioned in his Preface to the Coronet books that he thought recasting younger actors to play Bond and thus having the movie franchise continue indefinitely was absurd. Something else that makes me think he wanted Connery to continue... but until the Fleming material dries out.
-He probably perceived his TSWLM script as mercy killing. I do think it wanted to murder the franchise, or what it had become in his eyes.
-Given that Burgess wrote very strong female characters (positive or negative ones) and rather vulnerable men, I wonder how the Bond girls would have turned out... and their relationship with Bond.
Anthony Burgess claimed that the scene in the novel was inspired by the rape of his own wife (his first), although this may have been a fabrication.
Excellent find Ludovico! This was completely new to me, and it answers several questions about Burgess's attitudes toward his script and the Bond films. I wonder if he enjoyed TLD, since Dalton reverted to the semi-realism he enjoyed more in Bond.
Nice Burgess find there, @Ludovico. I'll look forward to reading that later on today.
In case anyone's looking for it, the article has now been moved to: https://www.anthonyburgess.org/blog-posts/observerburgess-prize-burgess-james-bond/
Thanks. There's an interesting programme on BBC Radio 3 according to the Burgess Facebook group run by his biographer Andrew Biswell.
Yes his own take on Oedipus, a rewriting of Sophocles' play: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b08g4cly
I met Andrew Biswell on a number of occasions and the gang of the Foundation. I don't have much time to visit them since I have become a dad but I hope to do my pilgrimage to Manchester at some point.
I noticed that he'd linked my Bond article on Burgess in 2015 which was great to see. I only joined it late last year. Maybe I should do the second part of it for Burgess' centenary.
Nuria?
Oh, right. You're probably right. Been a while since I looked at the post. :)
I just checked back there and it was Andrew Biswell who linked it on the Burgess FB group.
Thank you very much for providing that link again, @Revelator!
I've finally been able to download it and print it. Looking forward to reading that later on today.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04tpdjr
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04tmp95
I'll smash your face for you, yarblockos!
Translation: Thanks!
The new book is an automatic-buy as far I'm concerned. I've read all three earlier collections of Burgess's criticism and journalism--Urgent Copy, Homage to Qwert Yuiop, and One Man’s Chorus--and found them sheer pleasure to read. I'm eagerly looking forward to reading the "lost" essays.