It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
It would be so great for that to happen. I think I read a little while back that he said he would, or that he was already asked to return. I think the same goes for Carrie Fisher.
And we know Harrison would. He would think he could still play Han at age 90. I love him, but boy is he delusional. See Indy 4.
Same. The point I am trying to make is that Harrison will think he can return to any role at any age.
It's doubtful. But add to that Grand Admiral Thrawn.
Let's not forget Dash Rendar. Let's throw in Kyp Durron for good measure.
I just wish the Bond producers or studio for that matter would recognize the added value of a creative and cohesive poster campaign like Disney pictures, who seem to be sending out all the right signals it terms of marketing. The fact that they are still sticking with an illustrative artist rather than the generic Photoshopped nonentities is definitely the way to go and one that EON should return to with all due haste.
If you want to read more about Drew Struzan hit the jump...
http://collider.com/star-wars-drew-struzan-posters/#more-225909
As far as Star Wars goes, does this mean they'll want John Williams back as well? Might as well milk everyone for everything they're worth while they're breathing...
Oh boy oh boy oh boy oh boy oh boy oh boy oh boy oh boy!!! [-O<
If not.. it HAS GOT TO BE, NO DOUBT Michael Giacchino. I don't care if he's doing Star Trek too. He is THE guy besides Williams. But I'd still prefer Williams.
What would it matter if he was also doing Star Trek? Ben Burtt, the creator of the original sound effects for the first six Star Wars films also did the sound effects for the 2009 Star Trek.
I completely agree with with your wish for the Bond team to abandon the generic photoshop approach to posters. I'm a fan of Struzan's work. From what I've read I don't know if retirement was something for which he was eager or he was just as tired of so many producers just slapping together some images and calling the results a movie poster. I know there were several films for which he did artwork that was ultimately discarded for the less imaginative approach. His apparent lack of enthusiasm might just be caution from having been burned in the past.
Exactly. I think it is a big worked up myth that all Trekkies and Star Wars fans have an animosity towards each other when it's all about living long and prospering. No need to fight. ;)
They take place after ROTJ and everything! 8->
I don't get it anyway. I love Star Wars and Star Trek (Star Wars a little more, but I have fonder memories of Star Wars than Star Trek), they're not that similar. Star Wars has intergalactic swordsmen swashbuckling and fighting evil. There was a little political sideplotting in the prequels and (surprisingly) quite a bit of the EU, but it was very much a straight Good Vs Evil, old-school fantasy storyline set in a futuristic society. Star Trek is exploration (very much Wagon Train in space, as Gene Roddenberry described it), some political study, societal study, a lot of commentary on issues that plague and describe society, no one is good or evil (well, except the Borg). A sci-fi story if ever there was one. Hell, if any two franchises with the word "star" in the title should be compared, it's Star Trek and Stargate, because Stargate follows Trek's "planet of the week" methodology quite well.
Could it be based on Star Wars: The Force Unleashed(Starkiller)?
Well, I doubt that. They've already said it would be an original story. Now, supposing Starkiller's TFUII clone is still alive, they might bring him back, but I doubt it.
GROAN. Terrible character.
Actually I didn't like ANY of Zahn's much vaunted trilogy except for Thrawn. It was very dry and staid. For my money, Brian Daley, Matthew Stover and Kevin J. Anderson wrote the closest to the original feel of Star Wars.
I love the Thrawn Trilogy, though my favorite EU novel has to be Death Troopers. I'm a sucker for zombies, even in the Star Wars universe. Labyrinth is good, a slightly quick read (I'm a slow reader, and it took me less than three days to read it) with a kind of boring section near the middle involving what Anakin and Obi-Wan are doing during the Siege of Coruscant.
I liked "Death Troopers" as well but the thing that lost points with me was...
To be honest I'm happy to hear that Labyrinth is a good and quick read because I'm a slow reader too. I've been wanting to read this one for a while now, I've heard nothing but good things about it. Fans of SW have told me that "Darth Maul: Shadow Hunter" and "Labyrinth of Evil" are the two best PT books. I would also like to read the "Republic Commando" series.
Shadow Hunter is good too. It's also a little fast, but not as fast as Labyrinth. Seeing as I've not read all of the Prequel Trilogy novels (I've read the novelizations, Shadow Hunter, Labyrinth, Outbound Flight, which is my personal favorite PT book, and most of Dark Lord: The Rise of Darth Vader), I don't know if I'd call those two the best. The Republic Commando novels are great, though. I've not read all of each book, but I've read quite a bit of all five (Hard Target, Triple Zero, True Colors, Order 66 and Imperial Commando 501st). Hard Target and True Colors seem to be the two best, with Order 66 and 501st coming next and Triple Zero just being kind of awful.
At first, I had a problem with that, too, but then I learned that James Luceno didn't have a title when he turned in the manuscript, and that Lucasbooks were the ones who named it. When you know that, the discrepancy between the title and the contents makes sense.