Last Bond Movie You Watched

1171172174176177332

Comments

  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    Posts: 4,423
    Darn tootin'!
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    What's the matter sailors, Never seen a Major take a shower before? ;)
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    I have to totally agree with @royale65 about that moment when Moore arrives in Cairo with that ominous cue from Hamlisch. If I had to pick a single 5 seconds moment in the entire 24 films, that'd be my pick. Pure Bond right there!
    Agreed. Truly one of the iconic moments in the franchise, and one of many in this film, which is just pure class all round.
  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    Posts: 4,423
    It is a small moment, but just a great moment :)
  • Posts: 9,846
    Ah the bondathon in order continues with you only live twice and I am underwhelmed.... It's an ok film just the lack of charm from Connery plus and this is gonna make everyone upset but honestly the villains are extremely bland. Osako comes off as weak and uninteresting, Helga is basically Fiona Volpe 2.0, the blonde henchmen (whose name I can't even remember) is a bland Red Grant rip off, even Blofeld is just ok (Pleasence is better then Charles "Just A jump to the left" Grey but isn't fantastic) ... Odd even Auric Goldfinger is quite memorable (even if the film he is in not fantastic) well anyways it was ok not great up next On Her Majesties Secret Service

    Ranking 2016
    From Russia with love
    Thunderball
    Dr. no
    Goldfinger
    You only live Twice (I can't believe I am putting this below Goldfinger it's just apart from Tanaka the characters are very bland and forgettable)
    Casino Royale '54
    Casino Royale '67
  • ForYourEyesOnlyForYourEyesOnly In the untained cradle of the heavens
    Posts: 1,984
    Continuing on with my sequential watches, I watched Tomorrow Never Dies and it occurred to me (again) how desperate they must've been without Cubby. The loss of his presence seemed to be felt greatly here, and everything felt like it was ripped from the world of '97 (including, in fact especially, the plot). I think this movie already set in motion the infamous slide into near-destruction that the Brosnan era is now often remembered for. That finale still gets me as one of the worst in the franchise.
  • Posts: 3,336
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I watched CASINO ROYALE (2006) last night as part of my latest extensive Bond-A-Thon. I remembered how, at first viewing, much I was thrilled at the end when it appeared that Craig had become "James Bond, 007". Little did I know that three films later we'd still be getting there. I believe this was a crucial mistake (at least in terms of my own personally satisfaction) that EON made. Had they just dropped the heavy continuity at that point, just said the Craig is the experienced Bond that we know, form here on in, and continued with single missions, we would have had a much better run of films. As much as I enjoy, nay love, QUANTUM OF SOLACE (number 10 or 11 in my personal rankings), I do feel that the continual quest for identity, as well as this half-assed attempt at unifying plots, has been a detriment to the overall experience.

    But you still have 2-3 of the Craig movies in your top Ten though.
  • Posts: 3,336
    And I also agree with you that it would have been better with a new mission each film.
    As much as I love CR, the other Craig movies aren't even in my top 10.
  • Posts: 3,336
    Birdleson wrote: »
    Yes, CR 1, SF 9, QOS 10 or 11. Still, after CR I think Bond should have been the complete man.

    CR is your number 1 now :) ?
  • Posts: 3,336
    Birdleson wrote: »
    Meant 4. Sorry.

    I figured. Since i can't see anything passing GF on your list.

  • Posts: 3,336
    Birdleson wrote: »
    Then you know me well. Notice we are already past halfway ti the goal on your thread!?!

    Yes i have :)
    Many new people have suddenly shooted in with tons of views each! Im glad that so many participates.
  • ForYourEyesOnlyForYourEyesOnly In the untained cradle of the heavens
    Posts: 1,984
    We'll definitely get past 1000.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited May 2016 Posts: 23,883
    TSWLM

    Discussion earlier on this thread compelled me to watch this film today for the first time since my pre-SP Bondathon.

    This was one of my most enjoyable viewings in some time. TSWLM is firmly entrenched at #4 in my all time Bond ranking and I almost feel like moving it up a notch ahead of current #3 CR based on this viewing.

    Sir Roger Moore is just brilliant in this film. He doesn't put a foot wrong in my view. Yes, there's some humour, but he is still very credible here as 007. Determined, focused, and cool as ever, I'm beginning to think that this is Moore's best performance as Bond.

    I love almost everything about this film and always have. Claude Renoir's magnificent sweeping cinematography, Lewis Gilbert's excellent direction (this is the best of his 3 imho), Marvin Hamlisch's suspenseful Oscar nominated score (one of the best non-Barry efforts), & Carly Simon's signature Bond anthem Oscar nominated title song (also one of my favourites, & Roger Moore's favourite Bond song).

    What's especially impressive about Spy is how it so beautifully combines old school espionage & thriller elements (primarily in Egypt where it almost rivals FRWL imho) so seamlessly with larger than life elements (primarily in the latter half of the film).

    In fact, I think the film is near perfect until the Liparus sequence, where it drags a bit (they had to get their money's worth with the rebuilt Pinewood studio massive submarine set I suppose). I can forgive it though, because it gives us a Sir Rog signature Bond kick 'a' moment riding the overhead camera with the Bond theme at full blast. The finale aboard Atlantis is one of the best imho, including the Jaws final shark tank fight.

    This is such a great Bond film. Iconic & classic. Nobody does it better. Indeed.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,395
    bondjames wrote: »
    TSWLM

    What's especially impressive about Spy is how it so beautifully combines old school espionage & thriller elements (primarily in Egypt where it almost rivals FRWL imho) so seamlessly with larger than life elements (primarily in the latter half of the film).

    In fact, I think the film is near perfect until the Liparus sequence, where it drags a bit.

    How does Spy have old school espionage in it. Maybe for like 20 minutes near the beginning, but apart from that, I don't see it.

    I do agree that the Liparus scene is way too long. From when Bond's sub is captured there is like 40 minutes left of the film. The whole fight, changing the course of the missiles, rescuing Anya, it just keeps going. If they could have cut this whole thing down a bit, Spy would probably make it onto my top 10.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    Moonraker. I must say, this is a Bond movie that gets better with every viewing. I know many loathe it for it's very over the top nature but that doesn't bother me. The older I get the more I can accept Bond movies on their own merits and enjoy them. I love grounded and serious Bond and I love Campy, over the top Bond. I consider myself to be a balanced Bond fan. I can enjoy things from every Bond film, even ones low on my list. I find Moonraker to be so charming and fun. It may not be entirely true to Bond, I don't care, It's a fun ride and I love it.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,395
    Live And Let Die

    The most Flemingesque Moore film, and my personal favourite. I love seeing Moore trying to fit in in Harlem, the comedy is a lot more natural than later Moore films. Its situational, rather than just gags for the sake of it.

    The one scene I don't like is the plane driving sequence with Mrs Bell. That, and the famous Villain pops like a balloon bit.

    This film has one of my favourite scenes of the series when Bond puts a gun on Rosie. He is very cold there, very Fleming.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited May 2016 Posts: 23,883
    bondjames wrote: »
    TSWLM

    What's especially impressive about Spy is how it so beautifully combines old school espionage & thriller elements (primarily in Egypt where it almost rivals FRWL imho) so seamlessly with larger than life elements (primarily in the latter half of the film).

    In fact, I think the film is near perfect until the Liparus sequence, where it drags a bit.

    How does Spy have old school espionage in it. Maybe for like 20 minutes near the beginning, but apart from that, I don't see it.
    I'm referring to the entire Egypt sequence, from Bond arriving, to getting the info on Fekkesh and Kalba, to finding each of them (Fekkesh at the pyramids with Anya, then following him, seeing Jaws & thrashing the 2 KGB agents), to meeting Anya & Kalba at the Mojaba club & negotiating for the microfilm, to Kalba's death by Jaws, to following and fighting with Jaws at the Karnak temple to the boat ride with Anya.

    Old school down to earth spy & also thriller elements emanate from that whole section of the film. That's combined with the unrivaled natural beauty of the settings, Hamlisch's suspenseful score, Jaw's lurking menace (in such contrast to his goofiness in MR) & the overall mood that is conveyed. It has always been (since childhood) the most suspenseful & classiest part of a Bond film for me, along with Bond at the Hagia Sopia & on the Orient Express in FRWL. Both films also radiate with a romantic undertone that's intoxicating. It's all in the 'mood'.

    SF came close to recapturing that feeling for me with the much shorter Shanghai sequence. Again classy film making that can only come from Bond.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    edited May 2016 Posts: 13,978
    Spectre
    3rd overall viewing, and i'm starting to pick up on things that I might've missed on my first 2 viewings. I now see that crashing the plane into the back of the jeep carrying Madeline wasn't Bonds intention. When he clips the end of the wings off, it was out of his hands then. Alternatively, during the car chase, when Bond is stuck behind the Fiat 500, he passes a number of crossroads, and doesn't turn off until he reach the T junction. He has a number of opportunities to swing into an alleyway, but he doesn't take them.

    I do like Spectre, and I will gladly say that Daniel Craig is superb in the film. It's nice to have a proper Bond film from him. But there is no getting around that Spectre is flawed, enjoyable, but flawed. The connection between Bond and Blofeld still doesn't sit right with me. Maybe if I hadn't seen any of the past films with Blofeld, or if I had not read any of the books, than it wouldn't bother me.

    Spectre gets a top 10 place in my ranking, coming in at #7.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,789
    Spectre gets a top 10 place in my ranking, coming in at #7.
    Respectable enough... #8 for me, yet I seem to like it a lot more than you do... strange.
    :-?
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited May 2016 Posts: 23,883
    TMWTGG

    My positive experience with TSWLM yesterday whetted my appetite for 'Moore' Bond, so I put on one of my subjective favourites.

    It was just as great as always. I love this film, although I realize it's not highly ranked over here. Ted Moore & Oswald Morris's cinematography is fantastic, and the colours pop nicely on blu ray. Roger Moore is in fine form, more of the ruthless bastard than the charmer that he became in later years.

    Highlights for me include Barry's score (it's quirky yet charismatic & memorable, like the film), Lee's chilling Scaramanga, Maud Adam's beautiful yet doomed Andrea (reminds me a lot of similar Severine), & Eckland's ditzy yet loyal Goodnight (reminds me a little of Harris's incompetent MP in SF).

    While watching this film, I thought about the late Guy Hamilton (RIP) and realized that all of his films are enjoyable, reasonably upbeat & most of all, fun. They also all have several memorable franchise moments and charismatic villains. In this era of somewhat overbearingly somber fare, I commend him for having given us lighthearted entries like this which we can enjoy when we don't want something too serious.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,395
    Personally I feel Hamilton is criminally underated. I have 2 of his in my top 10.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    While I do enjoy Moore's rather charmer character, I would've preferred if he remained the ruthless bastard that he was in the first two films.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,395
    While I do enjoy Moore's rather charmer character, I would've preferred if he remained the ruthless bastard that he was in the first two films.

    Yeah, some say he wasn't playing too his strengths, but I think he was rather good at it. I love the " I want him there." In Miss Anders Hotel room.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    While I do enjoy Moore's rather charmer character, I would've preferred if he remained the ruthless bastard that he was in the first two films.

    Yeah, some say he wasn't playing too his strengths, but I think he was rather good at it. I love the " I want him there." In Miss Anders Hotel room.
    I loved that scene, too. And it was very Bondian. But, nowadays, a character behaving like that is to be antagonized by the general audience, much to my dismay. Moore, to my knowledge, hated being like that, so he had to dial his "ruthlessness" down in the next few entries. He even hated the car kick scene in For Your Eyes Only. What a sensitive chap.
    Birdleson wrote: »
    Those were his two best performances. Closer to Fleming's Bond (Moore, not the tenor of the films) than any other interpretation.
    Spot on, once again, Birdleson.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,789
    Birdleson wrote: »
    Those were his two best performances. Closer to Fleming's Bond (Moore, not the tenor of the films) than any other interpretation.
    You KNOW it dude!

  • SzonanaSzonana Mexico
    edited May 2016 Posts: 1,130
    loved that scene, too. And it was very Bondian. But, nowadays, a character behaving like that is to be antagonized by the general audience, much to my dismay. Moore, to my knowledge, hated being like that, so he had to dial his "ruthlessness" down in the next few entries. He even hated the car kick scene in For Your Eyes Only. What a sensitive chap.

    Maybe the general perception that he didn't portray those hard moments to his strenghts is precisely because of how vocal Moore was against it and how often he said he felt very uncomfortable doing those scenes.

    Yes he is a very sensitive chap but that worked on his favor at the end. Its what made him truly original and he is actually the most different from the other Bonds.
    That hate for violence helped him recreate the character.
  • royale65royale65 Caustic misanthrope reporting for duty.
    Posts: 4,423
    Tomorrow Never Dies

    Sleek, explosive, hi-tech and pacy. Roger Spottiswoode does well in the directors chair; one can tell he was an editor, not one wasted shot. A quite breathless experience! Reading @Murdock's excellent thread, “Bond Movie Cover Art Discussion Thread”, got me in the mood for some VHS action, so I booted the old VHS up and watched TND, with all its nostalgic goodness and supreme cover art. Despite the drawbacks to an outdated format, I found myself getting more and more involved with TND. Maybe because it wasn't the pristine experience of Blu Ray and more of a rough and ready thing?

    Which was lucky, as previous to TND, I felt a certain disconnect between the Brosnan's films and the rest of the canon. Mainly as there is scant Fleming feeling/style and more of a cinematic style, that permeates the Brosnan era. But with TND, and its classic tropes plus Arnold's score, reversed that feeling. Ironically it was the Craig era that I felt disconnected too. Two things have helped, one quite a minor, superficial thing – CR has the same intro as the rest of the classic 20 films found on the UE editions and the Blu Ray - the scantily clad lady and the GB*. And the other is SP.

    Anyway, Pierce Brosnan cements his role as the legendary 007, giving us a more complete, and composed performance. TND has a good cast, namely Michelle Yeoh, who is the best of Bond's "comrades in arms", other strengths include the plot, reworked from Spy, hence why it follows Spy, but giving it a more modern twist to keep it relevant - more so today methinks.

    Worse Bit - Teri Hatcher was disappointing - stunt casting. More to the point, what does Bond see in her? “Too close for comfort” my ass.

    Best Bit – Brosnan glad in his white dress shirt and gun holster.

    Royale's Ranking

    From Russia With Love – 10/10
    Casino Royale – 9.5
    Dr. No – 9.5
    Licence to Kill – 9
    The Living Daylights - 9
    The Spy Who Loved Me - 9
    Goldfinger – 9
    Octopussy - 8.75
    Thunderball – 8.75
    Tomorrow Never Dies – 8.75
    For Your Eyes Only – 8.75
    Spectre – 8.5
    Quantum of Solace – 8.5
    GoldenEye – 8.5
    Live and Let Die – 7.5
    A View To A Kill - 7
    Moonraker - 7
    Diamonds Are Forever - 7
    Die Another Day - 7



    1. CR
    2. LALD
    3. MR
    4. DAD
    5. DAF
    6. FRWL
    7. DN
    8. GF
    9. AVTAK
    10. LTK 
    11. QoS
    12. GE
    13. FYEO 
    14. TLD
    15. SP
    16. OP
    17. TB
    18. Spy
    19. TND
    20. OHMSS
    21. YOLT
    22. TMWTGG
    23. TWINE
    24. SF


    *
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    royale65 wrote: »
    Tomorrow Never Dies

    Sleek, explosive, hi-tech and pacy. Roger Spottiswoode does well in the directors chair; one can tell he was an editor, not one wasted shot. A quite breathless experience! Reading @Murdock's excellent thread, “Bond Movie Cover Art Discussion Thread”, got me in the mood for some VHS action, so I booted the old VHS up and watched TND, with all its nostalgic goodness and supreme cover art. Despite the drawbacks to an outdated format, I found myself getting more and more involved with TND. Maybe because it wasn't the pristine experience of Blu Ray and more of a rough and ready thing?

    Which was lucky, as previous to TND, I felt a certain disconnect between the Brosnan's films and the rest of the canon. Mainly as there is scant Fleming feeling/style and more of a cinematic style, that permeates the Brosnan era. But with TND, and its classic tropes plus Arnold's score, reversed that feeling. Ironically it was the Craig era that I felt disconnected too. Two things have helped, one quite a minor, superficial thing – CR has the same intro as the rest of the classic 20 films found on the UE editions and the Blu Ray - the scantily clad lady and the GB*. And the other is SP.

    Anyway, Pierce Brosnan cements his role as the legendary 007, giving us a more complete, and composed performance. TND has a good cast, namely Michelle Yeoh, who is the best of Bond's "comrades in arms", other strengths include the plot, reworked from Spy, hence why it follows Spy, but giving it a more modern twist to keep it relevant - more so today methinks.

    Worse Bit - Teri Hatcher was disappointing - stunt casting. More to the point, what does Bond see in her? “Too close for comfort” my ass.

    Best Bit – Brosnan glad in his white dress shirt and gun holster.

    Royale's Ranking

    From Russia With Love – 10/10
    Casino Royale – 9.5
    Dr. No – 9.5
    Licence to Kill – 9
    The Living Daylights - 9
    The Spy Who Loved Me - 9
    Goldfinger – 9
    Octopussy - 8.75
    Thunderball – 8.75
    Tomorrow Never Dies – 8.75
    For Your Eyes Only – 8.75
    Spectre – 8.5
    Quantum of Solace – 8.5
    GoldenEye – 8.5
    Live and Let Die – 7.5
    A View To A Kill - 7
    Moonraker - 7
    Diamonds Are Forever - 7
    Die Another Day - 7
    Excellent review, sir!
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,789
    Yes, well done old boy.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited May 2016 Posts: 23,883
    FYEO

    I decided to watch a Glen 'Moore' film tonight, and FYEO won out. I've had an up and down relationship with this film and it's never been one of my favourites. I've begun to enjoy it more over the years though. .

    Impressions:
    It was one of my better viewing experiences this time. Key notables include the colours, which are absolutely magnificent on blu ray. Everything is so crisp, starting with that great funeral pretitles scene (I never realized before that Blofeld looks like he did at the end of OHMSS - he's still got the neck brace and outfit from that film - is it meant to be Telly?).

    Bill Conti's score continues to impress and annoy equally. Some of the music is terrible imho (eg. during the Citroen chase and during some of the ski sequencing). Those scenes definitely would have benefited from something more orchestral. However, in other areas, I think his work is as good as Barry, especially the cowbell gunbarrel, that lovely part when Bond arrives in Cortina and goes up to his hotel, and the parts during the submarine sequence.

    Performance highlights for me include Carole Bouquet, who impresses as the grieving daughter out to avenge her parent’s murder. She is more convincing to me than the similarly described Kurlyenko in QoS. Underneath her icy cold demeanour is smoldering emotion, which comes out during the carriage ride in Cortina. She is just stunning (almost painfully so) to look at as well. Topol's Columbo is also a great character, in the Kerim mold.

    Moore is very good here, but I still rank his work in LALD, TMWTGG & TSWLM higher. In fact, I think he was actually better in OP as well. While his signature Locque kill is in this film, there is something a little 'too serious' about Rog in this one. Like he's not being himself - holding back. This could be on account of the scriptwriting (see below).

    Disappointments include Julian Glover's Kristatos, who I've just never found all that interesting. Quite forgettable imho. Lynn Holly Johnson as Bibi is also absolutely awful.

    The underwater scenes are well filmed, and the keelhauling sequence remains one of the better ones in the franchise in my view. The ski chase is excellent (previously mentioned score notwithstanding) as is the mountain climb, although I found the actual finale atop the mountain very underwhelming - actually one of the franchises worst imho.

    Summary:
    There's something about FYEO that lacks spark. The dialogue is muted and without energy. Everything just moves along in a somewhat pedestrian way. I'm not sure if that has anything to do with Michael Wilson, as this was the first film he shared writing duties on, or if it has to do with the fact that FYEO was originally conceived for a new actor (and not Moore), and perhaps they had a different path in mind.

    There's something a little too down to earth about the film for me as well. In fact, it fits in nicely with the Craig era due to its somewhat realistic take, but lacks that 'larger than life' spectacle of some of the grander Bond films. Having said that, it is a beautiful film to watch on blu ray, and is definitely much more impressive cinematographically than any of Glen's other efforts imho.

    It will never be a favourite of mine, but I enjoy it for what it is.
Sign In or Register to comment.