› ›

Coming soon to cinemas near you! - The upcoming films thread

1…3536384041…430

Comments

  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    Murdock wrote:
    Creasy47 wrote:
    'Cleanskin' was a fantastic movie. It's very slow-paced at times, but I loved it and thought Bean was excellent in it.

    First on the "to buy" List. :D

    I think it's more than worth it!

    On topic, here's the trailer for Tom Cruise's new film 'Edge of Tomorrow':

    http://www.slashfilm.com/edge-of-tomorrow-trailer-tom-cruise-reloads-his-war-game-over-and-over/
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    edited December 2013 Posts: 28,694
    WARNING. DO NOT READ THE POST BELOW IF YOU ACTUALLY *gasp* WANT TO EVER ENJOY BREAKING BAD.
    thelivingroyale wrote:
    The very premise of Breaking Bad makes it clear that Walt will die. If it spoilt how then fair enough but the whole series was a Scarface esque rise and fall story about a chemistry teacher turned meth kingpin with cancer. It was never going to end well from him.

    Wow, seriously? Now it is officially spoiled for me and anyone else who reads this thread daily, so thanks a lot for that, mate. X(

    Tally up another point for the damn internet, will you boys?!
  • WillyGaloreWillyGalore
    Posts: 6,396
    I wish people would learn to use this bloody thing!
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    WillyGalore wrote:
    I wish people would learn to use this bloody thing!

    Same. Did it just get ruined for you too?
  • thelivingroyalethelivingroyale
    edited December 2013 Posts: 12,837
    What? The whole reason I mentioned it was because you said it'd been spoilt for you, so how can I have ruined it for you now?
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    thelivingroyale wrote:
    What? The whole reason I mentioned it was because you said it'd been spoilt for you, so how can I have ruined it for you now?
    I only saw a photo of him, but didn't know if Walt was of those that died or if his photo was being used to show that characters from the show had died that would be mentioned in the article;
    I didn't know for certain until now. Even still, think about the other people here who don't want the show spoiled for them which you ruined out in the open without using any spoiler tags whatsoever.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    That's why I was saying that nothing about it is obvious. I watched the show beginning to end and wasn't sure of how it would end until it was spoiled for me, as well.
  • WillyGaloreWillyGalore
    Posts: 6,396
    I haven't seen it yet and had made the best efforts to avoid the Breaking Bad thread so that I wouldn't have the ending spoiled for me.
  • thelivingroyalethelivingroyale
    Posts: 12,837
    0BradyM0Bondfanatic7 wrote:
    thelivingroyale wrote:
    What? The whole reason I mentioned it was because you said it'd been spoilt for you, so how can I have ruined it for you now?
    I only saw a photo of him, but didn't know if Walt was of those that died or if his photo was being used to show that characters from the show had died that would be mentioned in the article;
    I didn't know for certain until now. Even still, think about the other people here who don't want the show spoiled for them which you ruined out in the open without using any spoiler tags whatsoever.

    I'm sorry if I ruined it for anyone else but you said it'd been spoilt for you, so yes, I assumed it actually had.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    WillyGalore wrote:
    I haven't seen it yet and had made the best efforts to avoid the Breaking Bad thread so that I wouldn't have the ending spoiled for me.

    Feels great, doesn't it? The internet will ruin everything for you; you can't run, and you can't hid from it either.
    thelivingroyale wrote:
    0BradyM0Bondfanatic7 wrote:
    thelivingroyale wrote:
    What? The whole reason I mentioned it was because you said it'd been spoilt for you, so how can I have ruined it for you now?
    I only saw a photo of him, but didn't know if Walt was of those that died or if his photo was being used to show that characters from the show had died that would be mentioned in the article;
    I didn't know for certain until now. Even still, think about the other people here who don't want the show spoiled for them which you ruined out in the open without using any spoiler tags whatsoever.

    I'm sorry if I ruined it for anyone else but you said it'd been spoilt for you, so yes, I assumed it actually had.

    I still fail to see why that gives you the right to post the ending's result for all to see though, without spoiler tags.
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,355
    WillyGalore wrote:
    I haven't seen it yet and had made the best efforts to avoid the Breaking Bad thread so that I wouldn't have the ending spoiled for me.

    I haven't seen it either so you're not alone.
  • WillyGaloreWillyGalore
    Posts: 6,396
    Samuel001 wrote:
    WillyGalore wrote:
    I haven't seen it yet and had made the best efforts to avoid the Breaking Bad thread so that I wouldn't have the ending spoiled for me.

    I haven't seen it either so you're not alone.

    Saves me £60 for the boxset I guess... :((
  • thelivingroyalethelivingroyale
    edited December 2013 Posts: 12,837
    So you're not going to watch it because you know one (admittedly important) detail about the ending? There's still tons to surprise you and you'd be missing out on what might be the best show ever made if you didn't watch it. I know Bond's going to survive Bond 24 but I'm still going to see it at the cinema.

    Once again, I'm sorry. I've spoiler tagged it and apologised, can we please move on now. I actually have some film news to post if anybody gives a sh*t.

    http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/s121/the-inbetweeners/news/a536848/the-inbetweeners-movie-2-reveals-first-picture-from-australia.html
  • RogueAgentRogueAgent
    Posts: 12,526
    Risico007 wrote:
    http://herocomplex.latimes.com/movies/godzilla-trailer-king-of-monsters-strikes-terror-in-first-teaser/

    enjoy

    Have to say that I like the look of that! Which surprises me! :)) Thanks for posting!
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    I'm certainly not trying to one up anyone, but I feel like I post a lot of links to some updated film information or a new trailer, then it gets re-posted a few posts down. Does anyone read the previous comments before posting "new" information?
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,804
    Creasy47 wrote:
    On topic, here's the trailer for Tom Cruise's new film 'Edge of Tomorrow':
    http://www.slashfilm.com/edge-of-tomorrow-trailer-tom-cruise-reloads-his-war-game-over-and-over/

    Umm....
    I'm there.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    chrisisall wrote:
    Creasy47 wrote:
    On topic, here's the trailer for Tom Cruise's new film 'Edge of Tomorrow':
    http://www.slashfilm.com/edge-of-tomorrow-trailer-tom-cruise-reloads-his-war-game-over-and-over/

    Umm....
    I'm there.

    I didn't like the premise that much, but the trailer completely sold me. Looks fantastic.
  • WillyGaloreWillyGalore
    Posts: 6,396
    Agreed. It does look good. Any film featuring time travel always goes down well.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    WillyGalore wrote:
    Agreed. It does look good. Any film featuring time travel always goes down well.

    Plus, Cruise really impressed me with 'Oblivion,' so I can't wait to see how another sci-fi film of his turns out. I hope it's as fantastic as the trailer makes it out to be.
  • WillyGaloreWillyGalore
    Posts: 6,396
    I haven't seen Oblivion yet. I must check it out soon.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    WillyGalore wrote:
    I haven't seen Oblivion yet. I must check it out soon.

    Yes, you do. Such an amazing film, really surreal world they created with it.
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,355
    WillyGalore wrote:
    I haven't seen Oblivion yet. I must check it out soon.

    Shall I spoil the ending for you?

    ;)
  • WillyGaloreWillyGalore
    Posts: 6,396
    Samuel001 wrote:
    WillyGalore wrote:
    I haven't seen Oblivion yet. I must check it out soon.

    Shall I spoil the ending for you?

    ;)

    =))
  • WillyGaloreWillyGalore
    Posts: 6,396
    And for anyone who hasn't seen Titanic...it sinks! ;-)
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    WillyGalore wrote:
    And for anyone who hasn't seen Titanic...it sinks! ;-)

    Well no point in seeing it now since you ruined it! Already had the endings to 'The Passion of the Christ' and 'Public Enemies' spoiled for me, too! Totally didn't see those coming.
  • WillyGaloreWillyGalore
    edited December 2013 Posts: 6,396
    :D

  • WillyGaloreWillyGalore
    Posts: 6,396
    Because we need another 're-boot':

    http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=39635

    Two words for this: EPIC FAIL.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    Read that this morning. Not only is Ed Helms a terrible choice, but I just don't see why this seems like a good idea. Leslie made the films hilarious by doing nothing at times: a stare, a silence, he made situations so funny, and it was filled with subtle, dry humor you would miss if you weren't paying attention. This is a terrible idea.
  • WillyGaloreWillyGalore
    Posts: 6,396
    Creasy47 wrote:
    Read that this morning. Not only is Ed Helms a terrible choice, but I just don't see why this seems like a good idea. Leslie made the films hilarious by doing nothing at times: a stare, a silence, he made situations so funny, and it was filled with subtle, dry humor you would miss if you weren't paying attention. This is a terrible idea.

    That's why the likes of Naked Gun and Airplane! worked so well. Nielsen was a dramatic actor who played the role straight down the middle. That's where the comedy came from. By hiring Helms, his instinct will be to 'go' for the gags. It just isn't going to work.
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,847
    WillyGalore wrote:
    Because we need another 're-boot':

    http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=39635

    Two words for this: EPIC FAIL.

    Was the world really clamoring for a new naked gun?

Sign In or Register to comment.