It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Cubby?
2012
jk.
Ironic or case in point?!
I have no idea what you're talking about
And thank goodness for it...
He's pretty obvious that his hair in Spectre was much fuller than SF. He was receding badly in the latter and the short haircut was clearly done to disguise this fact.\
Look at his hairline in this link:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2446630/Daniel-Craig-reveals-high-hairline-tries-new-look-size.html
Also look at his situation here (this snap was after QOS):
Suddenly it's all back:
Craig has had a little 'hair help' for sure between SF and SP
I agree... I actually thought I saw a "line" in the back of his head in SF, during the casino scene with Severine. This "line", if correct, would be where the hair would be taken from (where the roots are still healthy), and transplanted to another part of the head.
I think this was going on before and during SF, and agree that his hair is far thicker in SP.
Saying all that, he looks damn good (and I'm in the section for one more 007 feature out of him).
If you look closely, you can see the longer strands (not a weave) where the top and sides meet near the temple. Compare this to the short, spiky hair at the crown. Normally, the crown is longer than anywhere else, except for maybe the bangs. In DC's case, that area at the temples is longest.
I don't mean it as a negative thing at all. I'd do it if I was loosing my hair and had the money. Plus he looks so much better now than he did in 2012. Somehow he looks younger - he seemed a little chunky, blotchy and baldy at the Skyfall premiere. He looks the very epitome of cool in the second batch of snaps.
With DC, I do believe some work has been done however. When he walked out for the SP press release in December 2014 I noticed something a little different about him. As I've said before, it was around the eye area (apparent to me in the film as well) and in the hair line, which does appear a little fuller and I think it's more than the hair cut.
They can't get over Craig's physical appearance. Most people are too shallow. They want their stars to stay young or in a certain age group forever. Which also makes them illusional.
That'd be beyond the fringe.
Still annoys me even now... >:P
Honestly! Still don't understand why Craig's hair looks more Bondian in James Bond Ads, than James Bond movies. I think it was still ok in CR & QoS...but just too low in SF. They started getting his hair right from SP. I still would have loved his hair to be like the one he had in his unveiling/screen test/ first Casino Royale promotional pic, where he wore a dinner jacket and the gun's silencer was zoomed.