Denis Villeneuve's DUNE (2021)

1456810

Comments

  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,978
  • GettlerGettler USA
    Posts: 326
    Creasy47 wrote: »

    Oh cool! I wonder if he is Count Fenring?
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    Posts: 15,718
    6krgxm02yfxa1.jpg
  • M_BaljeM_Balje Amsterdam, Netherlands
    edited May 2023 Posts: 4,521
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,978
  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    edited May 2023 Posts: 25,161
    Creasy47 wrote: »

    Impressive, I need to rewatch Part 1 I had mixed feelings, I am a very biased fan of the David Lynch adaption from a visual point of view..
  • edited May 2023 Posts: 822
    Creasy47 wrote: »

    Impressive, I need to rewatch Part 1 I had mixed feelings, I am a very biased fan of the David Lynch adaption from a visual point of view..

    Same. I just don't see the improvement over Lynch's that many seem to. From a "telling the story more coherently" point of view, Villeneuve's Dune felt like it had the same beats and scenes, just with more time to breathe since it was a Part One.

    Visually and creatively speaking, I much, much prefer Lynch's Dune. The set, creature, and ship design of the new one in many ways felt obvious to me and what I would expect from a modern Hollywood interpretation, if that makes sense. The 1984 one felt more original, with more soul to me, if only just due to some of the outlandish creatures, effects, and Lynch-isms.

    I suspect the best version of Dune was unfortunately the one that we never got to see, from Jodorowsky. That would have been a true epic in my opinion. It had incredible potential.
  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    Posts: 25,161
    TheBondFan wrote: »
    Creasy47 wrote: »

    Impressive, I need to rewatch Part 1 I had mixed feelings, I am a very biased fan of the David Lynch adaption from a visual point of view..

    Same. I just don't see the improvement over Lynch's that many seem to. From a "telling the story more coherently" point of view, Villeneuve's Dune felt like it had the same beats and scenes, just with more time to breathe since it was a Part One.

    Visually and creatively speaking, I much, much prefer Lynch's Dune. The set, creature, and ship design of the new one in many ways felt obvious to me and what I would expect from a modern Hollywood interpretation, if that makes sense. The 1984 one felt more original, with more soul to me, if only just due to some of the outlandish creatures, effects, and Lynch-isms.

    I suspect the best version of Dune was unfortunately the one that we never got to see, from Jodorowsky. That would have been a true epic in my opinion. It had incredible potential.

    I can see he is a good director his films look cinematic though I find Villeneuve's films incredibly flat at times and one note, The Arrival for example I found incredibly dull and boring, I know Lynch did not like his version of Dune though I find the film visually interesting, compelling and outlandish in a great way.
  • ImpertinentGoonImpertinentGoon Everybody needs a hobby.
    Posts: 1,351
    Just watched it for the first time last night after seeing the trailer for Part 2 and finding out it's just on Prime here. Very good film. Very atmospheric. (I kind of see @TheBondFan's point that the design is... ...obvious? I like it, but yeah it's not really alien at all)
    There's still a few things I'm not totally sold on, like the hand-to-hand combat and generally the idea of Chalamet turning into a charismatic leader to the Fremen, but that's more of a Part 2 problem.
    Maybe it's because I know the book, but I don't get the "boring" critique I've read from some people. I felt it moved along at a solid clip and there was always something going on..
  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    Posts: 25,161
    Just been looking on Amazon, I am considering purchasing Part One in 4K though it may be better to wait for the boxset. The digital version of Part One is currently £4.99 on Prime I may get that for now.

    Do we know how many Part's Dune is being split up into?
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,978
    Just been looking on Amazon, I am considering purchasing Part One in 4K though it may be better to wait for the boxset. The digital version of Part One is currently £4.99 on Prime I may get that for now.

    Do we know how many Part's Dune is being split up into?

    It's just two parts for now but Villeneuve has expressed an interest in making a trilogy out of it by adapting Dune Messiah into a third film.
  • Fire_and_Ice_ReturnsFire_and_Ice_Returns I am trying to get away from this mountan!
    Posts: 25,161
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    Just been looking on Amazon, I am considering purchasing Part One in 4K though it may be better to wait for the boxset. The digital version of Part One is currently £4.99 on Prime I may get that for now.

    Do we know how many Part's Dune is being split up into?

    It's just two parts for now but Villeneuve has expressed an interest in making a trilogy out of it by adapting Dune Messiah into a third film.

    Interesting, I do have the DVD boxsets of both TV show adaptions may give them a rewatch to refresh my memory of the larger story, i just tend to revisit Lynch's film.

    7fsDyDX.jpg
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 4,021
    Creasy47 wrote: »

    Looks good. Loved part one.
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    Posts: 15,718
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    edited June 2023 Posts: 40,978
  • LucknFateLucknFate 007 In New York
    Posts: 1,649
    Looks excellent! Haven't the read the books, would rather see it.
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    Posts: 15,718
    Dune: Part 2 is apparently over 3 hours long.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,638
    I wasn’t sure where to put this, sorry to go off topic.

    https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/denis-villeneuve-names-his-favourite-james-bond-movie/
  • M_BaljeM_Balje Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Posts: 4,521
    https://www.darkhorizons.com/warners-delays-dune-part-two-to-2024/
    Dark Horizons
    Movie News
    Warners Delays “Dune: Part Two” To 2024
    By Garth Franklin

    Warner Bros. Pictures
    Warner Bros. Pictures has delayed multiple films on its schedule with the big one being Legendary Entertainment and Denis Villeneuve’s highly anticipated sequel “Dune: Part Two”.

    The film, which was to open November 3rd, is now being pushed back to March 15th 2024 due to the ongoing SAG-AFTRA strike. The film will also play in IMAX on its new date.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,978
    I'm bummed that it's shifting but not terribly surprised. Meanwhile, it seems films releasing only a few weeks later in the year are keeping their release dates for now, so expect more delays.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,978
    The sequel's now moved up two weeks to March 1st, 2024:

    https://deadline.com/2023/11/dune-2-delayed-march-2024-warner-bros-movies-1235527300/
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,978
  • Posts: 6,709
    That looks epic enough :)
  • Posts: 7,507
    Dune: Part 2 is apparently over 3 hours long.

    No surprise exactly considering the complex story
  • Official runtime is now 2 hours 46 minutes.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,978
    Official runtime is now 2 hours 46 minutes.

    I just saw that number the other day too but couldn't find any confirmation past a random Japanese link. Good enough runtime for me! Loved the first, very eager for Part 2.
  • M_BaljeM_Balje Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Posts: 4,521
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    Official runtime is now 2 hours 46 minutes.

    I just saw that number the other day too but couldn't find any confirmation past a random Japanese link. Good enough runtime for me! Loved the first, very eager for Part 2.

    https://www.darkhorizons.com/dune-part-two-to-be-villeneuves-longest/
    Dune: Part Two” To Be Villeneuve’s Longest
    By Garth FranklinMonday, December 11th 2023 12:01 pm

    Warner Bros. Pictures
    A new posting has revealed that Dennis Villeneuve’s highly anticipated sci-fi epic “Dune: Part II” will be the director’s longest film to date.

    Gavin in Cinema points to a screenshot from a Japanese film regulator named The Film Classification and Rating Organization which has reportedly classified the film as having a runtime of 166 minutes (2hr 46min).

    That’s eleven minutes longer than the 155 minute first part and three minutes longer than his previous longest film – “Blade Runner 2049”.
  • Posts: 7,507
    I honestly don't like the fact they've shortened it. There's so much story left to cover and I don't want them to rush it. If a movie is good I don't mind it lasting three or four hours.
  • M_BaljeM_Balje Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Posts: 4,521
    Tom Cruise soon in Dune 3 ? ;)

  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,978
    I won't be surprised to hear the first new project announced is the Edge of Tomorrow sequel/prequel/whatever it ends up being.
Sign In or Register to comment.