It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
They may have directors in mind, or have consulted with directors to see if they would like to potentially helm Bond 26, but unless there is a more finished script, I cannot see them hiring a director just yet.
I've always thought so.
I truly believe that EON backed themselves into a corner at this point and they don't know where to go. Combine that with changes within especially if Michael retires whom for 35 years was producing the films.
Let's compare large gaps in film franchise sequels and reboots.
Batman 1997-2005. 2012-2022
Superman 1987-2006. 2006-2013
Star Wars. 1983-1999. 2005-2015
Lord of the Rings. 2003-2012
Even MI went 6 years between 2 and 3 another 5-1/2 between 3 and 4.
This is true. But I think one reason the franchise has survived as long as it has has been its consistency. You could just rely on Bond coming back within an acceptable time frame. This also made it possible for less successful films to be produced because one always knew that there would be a next - and perhaps better - film afterwards. There was also a strong relationship between each film that other franchises don't have. I think you can't compare the Star Wars films from different eras, for example, because there's just too much time between them. This is easily possible in Bond films and that's great. However, I fear that the production of the Bond films will become more and more similar to the production of these other franchises.
Yes and after QOS, when he was asked about future films dealing with Vesper/Quantum, Dan was quoted as saying something like 'I'm so ****ing done with that storyline'! Good job he didn't know what was coming, I guess.
Compare Barbara with her father, the business he created, the background he was from. Hard work and devotion to its success became a self perpetuating family enterprise of which he was the padrone. It was no longer just about the money, but a reason for being and a context for the family dynamic.
For the next generation, with its own interests, of necessity different from that of the father, it becomes more akin to a perpetual wealth generator. All the better when prestige is attached to it. That way it becomes collateral in facilitating other, "more interesting" projects. Being the "Bond producer" will open every door. So no need to actually made them that often. The prestige and the power have already accrued ....
You might want to poke around the Internet about Cubby a bit before you lionize him. Just saying. ;)
I think Barbara and Michael are doing a fine job.
Honest question — why does this post focus on Barbara Broccoli and not Michael Wilson, who has just as much say on the films as she does?
Yes, and, being the original Bond producers, saw the two main guys become wealthier than God, they knee-capped their leading star and continued rolling in the dough….
https://www.nydailynews.com/2020/04/02/the-bond-market-how-two-men-made-millions-off-007/amp/
🤷♂️… it was always a business for a perpetual wealth generator…
I mentioned Barbara by name and not Michael, that's true. My impression is that she is now lead among them. Perhaps I'm wrong. She's certainly younger and probably represents the future of the franchise more so than Michael. And so the generational contrast is sharper today with her father regarding the point of the post:
Why I don't think we will see Bond films for the foreseeable future at more than, say, one or two a decade.
Of course the blockbuster dynamic in which the series is situated seemingly demands the annual budget of a small country and an army to match in making then, so that shouldn't be discounted too ....
I don't actually have a problem with Bond films at an ever decreasing rate of release. And if there were no more I would be content with what we have. In such an unlikely scenario NTTD would have been a fitting conclusion.
As for the post above yours, my use of the word "padrone" suggest something less than a complete "lionization" of Albert R.
I also think Michael and Barbara have done a fine job with the films under their stewardship. The Craig years have personally reinvigorated my love of the entire series.
And I thank them for it.
The third generation is the worst. The second watched the hard work of the first one.
This was an interesting article on Flemings desire to kill off Bond. It provides some context to the death of Bond in No Time To Die. Also, I agree with the author "The Black Daffodil" would be a great Bond movie title.
Good stuff! Thanks for sharing, @Bentley007.
Who knows. I'm as eager to find out as anyone else. I miss the second half of the nineties, when the next film was sure to come out in two years.
Curious on what you base this off @Mendes4Lyfe
I think its pretty self-explanatory. Based on the comments from Babs, Greg and having heard no official movement on Bond 26, even a website, it would seem that the chances of them having an actor already announced by next summer, and thus making that November 2026 release date, very low.
EON have had 28 months since Bond 25 released.
And they have more until 2026.
Remenber, this year is 2024.
Thanks for reminding me to read this! Fleming is a fascinating figure, warts and all.
It has been 3 years 4 if you count when it was supposed to come out