It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Edgar Wright - busy
Denis Villeneuve - busy
Mark Mylodd - busy
Not that Nolan wouldn't do a good job, but I worry he might have a massive ego have winning so many oscars for Oppenhiemer, he could take bond into some weird directions.
Oh boy….
As far as we know, two out of three of those directors haven’t met with EoN.
The third one will be done his film, about the same time Broccoli will be done with Othello.
Gobble, gobble.
Which film though? I thought Villeneuve has at least 2 projects announced, why would he announce them if he's not planning to begin work for another several years?
Chef, Villeneuve, like any big director, has about 10 projects in development. He himself recently said one of those project is slowly coming together (it’s in draft one development). We are talking years from now…
P.S @Mendes4Lyfe , he scheduled to shoot Messiah next June/July for a six month shoot.
I'm sick of a couple names and Chazelle is a very strong director, and he shoots beautiful films. I admire his work even when he has a so-called flop.
I'd also bet this isn't happening.
I wish it to be true, and will happily be wrong on my silly one-note prediction. But I stand by what I've unfortunately been repeating since mid-February.
If there was more solid news than Jordan whats-his-name on W of R claiming, under his usual RUMOUR heading, that the director met with EoN (this time with zero sources; he seems to have cobbled this assumption, based on his post, that it's mainly because Chazelle says he has two projects he's mulling over... But no where in his slop does it indicate the director did actually meet with EoN, lol.), then I'd happily pray for it to be true.
But it's not.
Not even Jordan's groupies in the film blogosphere supported his claim. This might as well have come from the Daly Mail.
Which is disappointing because Chazelle would be an exciting and excellent choice.
Chazelle seems more in line with the type EON go for, similar to Sam Mendes or Marc Forster, than either Nolan or Villeneuve, who remind me more of Speilberg or Ridley Scott - sort of genre autuers.
I wouldn’t disagree with this on its face, but, we know from DV himself that when Boyle left NTTD, DV was the person Eon called.
He had a meeting with them asap.
He wanted to do it, and they discussed how they could make it work, as both parties wanted him to direct this film. However, he was too deep into preproduction on DUNE to make it viable. By the end of that meeting, it was clear that he wouldn’t be able to do Bond at that time.
It was they that pursued him.
So he’s very much a director they wanted in the past. And if I’m to believe what I’ve heard, the director they still want.
But let’s see how this plays out, since I’m tired of hearing myself repeating this.
Still, pondering the currently-vacant James Bond director’s chair, Sam Mendes reasoned that “they want slightly more malleable people who are earlier in their career … who perhaps are going to use it as a stepping stone, and who are more controllable by the studio”.
It might be that this is Mendes rationalising his problems with Eon. Or it might be that generally Eon would like control over their director, but have enough faith in Villeneuve that they are willing to roll the dice on him going in a direction that they’d like.
I remember when I used to watch the tv show ‘E.R.’ you’d occasionally get a scene where a parent would burst into the operating room and throw themselves across the patient, screaming “what are you doing to my baby?”, before being dragged out. Then a member of staff would have to explain to the distraught parent that they are doing what is necessary to save their child. I imagine their is a similar issue between a studio and director at times. What Eon really want is someone to fix their problem, it’s just difficult to fin someone with whom to trust their baby with.
It's no surprise but it means that EON has to work harder on the reboot.
There is so much the producers need to consider when choosing a director that I don’t think it’s Nolan or nothing. There are dozens of directors that can handle the size and scope of a Bond film. Not many have the name recognition or track record of Nolan. For me, it seems as obvious a choice as Pierce Brosnan being cast as Bond in ‘87 or ‘95.
It does seem a bit odd that Nolan hasn't officially committed to a next project yet, considering his usual tendency to release a film on a consist 2 - 3 year basis.
Nolan and Villenueve can bring more than prestige, they can bring a new vision (and money :P)
I'm sure there are a lot of directors out there but I don't think they're going to hire the "new Nolan".
I will be happy if they find the new Fede Álvarez.
Agreed.
I dunno if either would necessarily make a Bond film I’d respond to (I’m not a fan of Nolan at all, so I’m sure I wouldn’t connect with any film he does), but it’s a savvy move.
And I’ve been convinced since February that B26 is DV’s to lose.
https://deadline.com/2024/10/christopher-nolan-new-movie-matt-damon-release-date-1236099940/
If this is accurate news, it seems Nolan won't be directing Bond 26. Bond 26 would have to be a 2027 or 2028 release date for Nolan to be available.
My guess is Eon would be reluctant to hire Nolan due to his asking price and any profit sharing deal he may want. I don't think Nolan will ever direct a Bond film although you never know.
And Eon don't Nolan. They can find fresh talent. Someone new. 😉
I’m not a big Nolan, but I doubt he’s some sort of fanboy desperate to make a Bond film. He’s a successful directer who takes each opportunity/project as it comes. And clearly he’s known for at least 1-2 years now that his next project won’t be Bond. It really wasn’t a secret either. He said this openly.
I also doubt it’s to do with his asking price. I know there were rumours about a meeting where Nolan proposed a period piece Bond film. No idea if that’s true (who knows either way?) but it would point to a creative difference which isn’t an unusual thing to happen. It may have been that he openly said he wanted much more creative control if he were to direct Bond. Heck, could simply be a case where he was more committed to this new project.
'You wouldn’t want to take on a film not fully committed to what you bring to the table creatively. So as a writer, casting, everything, it’s a full package. You’d have to be really needed, you’d have to be really wanted in terms of bringing the totality of what you bring to a character. Otherwise, I’m very happy to be first in line to see whatever they do.'
Not much ambiguity there - Nolan wants to direct, write, cast, 'everything...the totality' or he's not interested. EON wouldn't/couldn't hand over control of a Bond film (especially the first of a new Bond actor's run) to that extent, even to Christopher Nolan, could they?
If they met with Nolan about this, then I suspect it boils down to one of those two things, or indeed both. Either way it simply means he's not the right man for the job. It's not a loss in that sense.
Another interesting choice is Na Hong-jin. While he's known primarily for his work in horror films like The Wailing and The Medium, his mastery of suspense and atmosphere is undeniable. His ability to tell gripping, layered stories could bring a fresh perspective to Bond, pushing the franchise into darker, more intense territory. I think Na Hong-jin could create a Bond film that’s haunting, thrilling, and unforgettable.
James Mangold is also a fantastic candidate. With films like Logan, Walk the Line, and Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny under his belt, Mangold has proven himself as a director who can deliver emotionally driven stories with action at their core. His ability to blend character development with big, bold action scenes could work wonders for Bond, adding depth to the character while keeping the thrill alive.
Lastly, David Leitch deserves serious consideration. Known for high-octane action films like Atomic Blonde and Deadpool 2, Leitch excels at crafting intricate, stylish fight scenes and espionage-driven narratives. His work on Atomic Blonde, in particular, showed he can handle a sleek, sophisticated spy thriller, which would translate perfectly into the James Bond universe.
Each of these directors brings something unique to the table, and I believe any one of them could take the Bond franchise in exciting new directions while honoring its legacy.
I’d not heard of Na Hong-jin before, let alone the idea of him helming a Bond film. It’s nice to hear a new candidate. I’m not big on horror films but I do admire a lot of the work I see coming out of South Korea, and the idea of a director strong on suspense is very appealing to me.
I can't recommend this film highly enough—it's definitely worth a watch!