Reporting For Duty
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
Categories
In this Discussion
"Governments change, the lies stay the same." The politics of James Bond.
thedove
hiding in the Greek underworld
Based on recent discussion in the "What if" thread there was some thoughtful comments about the politics of our man Bond. Some opined that Bond would most likely lean right in terms of politics, others say some of his traits and thoughts would have him leaning left.
Cubby was quick to keep Bond out of politics and political stances. SPECTRE was used as the primary villain to have the Bond films sidestep SMERSH and the Russians being the baddies. In later films we have seen geo politics creep into the films but we have never seen how Bond felt on some of these issues.
Would you like to see James Bond take more of a stance on things politically? Or should he be kept as an apolitical character?
What do you see from his character actions that would cause you to think how he leans? Should the film series consider making him more political in future adventures or did Cubby have this right?
Lets discuss the politics of Bond in this thread. Please keep the dialogue respectful and on-point.
Cubby was quick to keep Bond out of politics and political stances. SPECTRE was used as the primary villain to have the Bond films sidestep SMERSH and the Russians being the baddies. In later films we have seen geo politics creep into the films but we have never seen how Bond felt on some of these issues.
Would you like to see James Bond take more of a stance on things politically? Or should he be kept as an apolitical character?
What do you see from his character actions that would cause you to think how he leans? Should the film series consider making him more political in future adventures or did Cubby have this right?
Lets discuss the politics of Bond in this thread. Please keep the dialogue respectful and on-point.
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I’m not sure Bond’s world view in either the books or films bears much resemblance to the modern day right. Certainly not in terms of basic economics. Bond stories often feature wealthy megalomaniac villains who believe they’re extraordinary enough to do evil things, whereas Bond does what he does out of a deeper sense of duty, morality, selflessness, and bravery. It’s conservative in a sense (albeit small c) but I don’t see it being a partisan series in this way, and ultimately I think Bond is in many ways separate from politics.
He's, as you say, complicated.
Regarding Bond’s sense of loyalty and duty to country, I recognize this is typically observed as a conservative quality, but that doesn’t mean it has to be. Many left-leaning people are patriotic, too, and I don’t believe Bond’s commitment to country is a giveaway in one direction or another of his political beliefs. I think he is just very driven to do his job.
One thing I feel I must bring up is Bond’s problematic attitudes and behaviors, including a sexist view of women in the Casino Royale novel, and also him being insensitive towards black people as described via a quick flashback in the Diamonds Are Forever novel. While the prejudice is unfortunate and strongly associated with rightwing thinking, I do believe things of this nature in Bond’s case are more related to him being “traditional” in his era, when a whole lot more people in general thought and talked in these sort of ways, rather than them being politically motivated. I could be wrong about this, but it’s my gut feeling that those kind of moments are “product of its time” material more than anything else.
Most of Bond’s foes are very affluent, and though Bond is not poor, he is much lower than them on the ladder. While I don’t think this makes him fighting them and defeating them inherently political, I do see an interesting concept of a lower class individual successfully “fighting the power,” so to speak, which suggests a popular leftwing kind of idea. The wealthiest people are often conservative, as that is what benefits them in keeping and propelling forward their status, and Bond likely can’t have a high opinion of them given how many in his world have been pure evil.
I may come back here and add more thoughts later, but these are just some of my own late night ramblings for now. A British person, or at least someone who knows a lot more about British culture than me, will likely have a more accurate and detailed analysis and understanding of Bond’s potential political placement. I hope I made at least some sense here, but anyways, in summary once again, I do not think Bond would identify himself as a rightwing or leftwing person, and the closest category I can think of for him in American terms is Libertarian.
I think trying to understand Bond from purely political or religious lines (at least to the extent where someone is trying to say ‘he’s on x side of the political spectrum’ or ‘he’s an agnostic/Christian etc) will always come up with contradictory points even when there’s overlap. To some extent it’s because the character is quite contradictory. He’s an agent of His/Her Majesty’s Government and yet his 00 status means he operates outside conventional policing. In his own habits/vices he’s rather liberal (I don’t mean that in a political sense), and yet he has that deeper sense of duty/bravery. I can’t imagine any film Bond giving much thought to politics or religion, and Fleming’s version only had occasional inner thoughts about these matters.
And as @007HallY mentions, there's how Bond thinks prohibition is the trigger of crime and feels bad for Blackwell and his operation. This of course contrasts to how he's disgusted with Le Chiffre's marijuana usage and Colombo's rejection of drugs.
It's hard to even peg Bond's moral code straight: he seems to dislike cheats and wifebeaters in MR, but enjoys the company of Draco and Kerim, both self-proclaimed rapists. But of course Scaramanga and his goons are seen as crass for their behaviour with the "entertainment."
Certainly, politics must be left out of the films. For example, look how LTK dated fast.
Once you bring politics into the mission, then the clear and simple good guy / bad guy situation gets blurred.
I always took Bond's Beatles comment in GF to be a sign that he was firmly in the establishment. I think those that have suggested a libertarian slant might be close to what Bond's motto is.
He makes no judgements on those in a different lifestyles, he seems to be a live and let live, or is that live and let die, kind of guy?
I think that Cubby had the right idea keeping the series apolitical as possible. The other challenge with tying up in geo-politics is that the film can age badly or show it's age. I had to give a minor history lesson to my son when we watched OP. He has grown up far removed from the Cold War and the Berlin Wall.
I've always wanted to do a lesson on the eyes by showing OP! Of course, it's not possible...
I can't watch this tripe.
Perhaps this is also a Rorschach test more than the search for a political profile. I do not doubt that we all read different things in Bond's attitude vis-à-vis the government, contemporary crises, youth culture, etc. The outcome of this attempt at putting Bond in a political box may have more to say about us than about the character.
But most of all I am convinced that Bond should not be thought of as a man of politics, even if we can assume that someone like him must have his own ideas about politicians and such. Whatever signs of political ideas Bond may have seemingly had, they are few and scattered over more than 60 years of film, not enough to reach solid conclusions anyway. I honestly think the filmmakers have done their darned best to keep Bond as politically neutral as possible. They want Bond to be fun for everyone. 'Hints' of his political preferences may therefore be entirely unintentional. Take Bond's remark about The Beatles. Some say that indicates Bond's position on the political spectrum. I'd say that's just a joke; it may not even have been meant by the character.
'There's that, and the fact that political left and right tend to drift as well. Don't forget the Democratic party in the US used to be the party of the south. yes. the conservatives.
That beeing said, I think Bond in the books is the best to go on for any indication of his political leanings.I think it's in TMWTGG that he shows sympathy for the communists under Fidel, mainly because of the corruption in Cuba.
The treatment of coloured people is another thing people have been talking about, but I think Bond is misunderstood there. The words now interpreted as deregatory were not seen that way in the 1950's. Bond strikes a friendship with Quarrel, respecting him in every way, even to his belief in dragons. In LALD Bond doesn't seem to be affected by the fact that his opponents come from a culture others in his day would see as inferior. On the contrary, he's taking it all very seriously. He's just there doing his job whilst others are judging.
He may see women as pleasures, but in the books doesn't do so in a disposable way. Again, on the contrary, he's constantly trying to built meaningful relationships, those, sadly, constantly fall apart. See especially Tiffany Case, whom even lives with him for some time.
Yes, he's sometimes taking things in his own hand, choosing to operate freely instead of informing M in time, but that's all his judgment to get the job done. He loves his home country and it's independence.
AFAK he doesn't complain about rules set by the government anywhere. He works for his government and does his job to the best of his abilities and judgment.
All in all, I'd say he's got humanist tendencies, and a preference for democracy and against those who abuse it. So, in his day that would be liberal. These days, however, it isn't that clear, as only the far left/right try to dispose of those values.
That's a great analysis, @CommanderRoss.
Are we overthinking? Sure, some of us are reading the tea leaves a bit. I agree with you @DarthDimi the screen version of our favourite Secret Agent has been kept very clean in terms of political views.
Each side might be able to point to a line of dialogue here, an action there. The bottom line is it is all speculation.
A few of the movies have tackled geo-politics and in some cases the movie is dated because of it. The most egregious might be TLD where Bond helps the rebels that eventually morphed into the Taliban.
When we think of the two movies that involved drugs the producers chose fictional countries as to not besmirch or belittle a whole nation. Hence Isthmus and San Monique being used to stand in for real life countries. These changes don't detract from the movie in any way.
Then don't