› ›

Skyfall's running time

13

Comments

  • marketto007marketto007 Brazil
    Posts: 3,277
    According to the Press Screening tickets, the film will have 2 HOURS and 20 MINUTES.
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    edited October 2012 Posts: 13,355
    We're just waiting on the BBFC now. Hopefully confirmation will arrive tomorrow.

    2 hours 20 minutes would make it joint second longest.

    I hope this is the running time @marketto007! ;)
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,959
    @DarthDimi, my thoughts exactly. I'll occasionally come across a 140-150 minute + film that really drags, but with Bond films, it truly lets them grow and develop at a nice pace.
  • marketto007marketto007 Brazil
    Posts: 3,277
    @Samuel001, I saw it earlier today on Instagram. Here's the photo.

    3929d55c138811e2b1c722000a1fba7b_7.jpg
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,355
    '2 hours 20 minutes TBC'. Thanks but it seems it's not quite confirmed though very likely.
  • katharine_craigkatharine_craig
    edited October 2012 Posts: 9
    tumblr_mbrny5BrYu1qcu8who1_500.jpg

    It's 145 minutes! Skyfall got its rating in South Korea today (15, similar to PG-13) and this is the capture image of the film rating institution website. As you can see the number on the right colum, it says the running time is 145 mins and it's perfect for me :)
  • nobodydoesitbetternobodydoesitbetter
    Posts: 1,021
    http://www.madiana.ws/index.php/rex/Cinema-Guadeloupe/D-Arbaud/Prochainement/Skyfall

    a cinema in Guadelope has a running time of 1hour45mins...

    surely this must be 145mins...
  • LizoLizo
    Posts: 30
    It's 142m 58s. According to the BBFC. And a 12A certificate in the UK.

    http://www.bbfc.org.uk/BFF289704/


    Lizo.
  • HerrBondHerrBond Berlin
    Posts: 50
    Yes, as I said before: 143 mins.

    thx for the link @lizo.
  • danpendanpen
    Posts: 17
    It is going to be a good film i hope!!
  • PanchitoPistolesPanchitoPistoles 2.0
    Posts: 4,619
    Lizo wrote:
    It's 142m 58s. According to the BBFC. And a 12A certificate in the UK.

    http://www.bbfc.org.uk/BFF289704/


    Lizo.

    Only 69 seconds shorter than the longest Bond film, Casino Royale.
    =D>
  • danpendanpen
    Posts: 17



    Lizo.[/quote]

    Only 69 seconds shorter than the longest Bond film, Casino Royale.
    =D> [/quote]

    Why is it only 69 shorter then Casino Royale.
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    edited October 2012 Posts: 13,355
    2 hours 23 minutes! Wow, it almost takes the record. Let's hope all this time is used wisely.

    At last, it is confirmed. Only two weeks now, people!
  • danpendanpen
    Posts: 17
    Samuel001 wrote:
    2 hours 23 minutes! Wow, it almost takes the record. Let's hope all this time is used wisely.

    At last, it is confirmed. Only two weeks now, people!

    I can not wait till it comes out :)
  • robboadamrobboadam
    Posts: 224
    Samuel001 wrote:
    2 hours 23 minutes! Wow, it almost takes the record. Let's hope all this time is used wisely.

    At last, it is confirmed. Only two weeks now, people!

    I thought the record was 138?
  • LizoLizo
    Posts: 30
    HerrBond wrote:
    Yes, as I said before: 143 mins.

    thx for the link @lizo.

    No problem. Off to see it this evening in all its 143 minute glory!
  • danpendanpen
    Posts: 17
    robboadam wrote:
    Samuel001 wrote:
    2 hours 23 minutes! Wow, it almost takes the record. Let's hope all this time is used wisely.

    At last, it is confirmed. Only two weeks now, people!

    I thought the record was 138?

    No it is not 138 mins ok!!
  • MrBondMrBond Station S
    Posts: 2,044
    Casino Royale is listed as 2 hours and 19 minutes. Doesen't that make CRs running length 139 minutes?
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    edited October 2012 Posts: 13,355
    That must be the region two version.

    It's running time is 2 hours 24 minutes.
    Lizo wrote:
    HerrBond wrote:
    Yes, as I said before: 143 mins.

    thx for the link @lizo.

    No problem. Off to see it this evening in all its 143 minute glory!

    Enjoy @Lizo!
  • JawsIsAliveJawsIsAlive
    Posts: 233
    One use of strong language? Are we getting the f-word in a Bond film?
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,355
    Said by Bond? I sure hope so, he said it in the novels so why not?
  • JawsIsAliveJawsIsAlive
    Posts: 233
    Samuel001 wrote:
    Said by Bond? I sure hope so, he said it in the novels so why not?

    It would make sense but I doubt Eon would do that. It'll probably be the villain.

  • Zorin61Zorin61
    Posts: 418
    143 - 145, i'm very happy with either. For me, QoS had the kiss of death on it even before i saw it for the first time. Just over 90 minutes is way to short for a Bond film, and its running time was at the back of my mind all the way through, so it felt even more rushed. I hoped that Skyfall would be at least 2 hours 10/15 mins, so, this is brilliant news:-)
  • RogueAgentRogueAgent
    Posts: 12,526
    Excellent news! This is the sort of runtime i was hoping for after a 4 year gap! :D Roll on 2 weeks today to the main event itself! <:-P
  • robboadamrobboadam
    Posts: 224
    danpen wrote:
    robboadam wrote:
    Samuel001 wrote:
    2 hours 23 minutes! Wow, it almost takes the record. Let's hope all this time is used wisely.

    At last, it is confirmed. Only two weeks now, people!

    I thought the record was 138?

    No it is not 138 mins ok!!

    No need for that, newbie.
  • doubleohdaddoubleohdad
    Posts: 1,146
    Two hours for any film not directed by David Lean is ideal.
  • myworldisenoughmyworldisenough
    Posts: 1,143
    Good length. Pleased its not going to be a rush job!
  • craigrulescraigrules
    Posts: 284
    The audience might use the F-word if the film drags.
  • danpendanpen
    Posts: 17
    craigrules wrote:
    The audience might use the F-word if the film drags.

    Why do you think the film will be a long time then? :))
  • boldfingerboldfinger
    Posts: 5,767
    bondsum wrote:
    Didn't know there was an expanded version of Last of the Mohicans until you mentioned it. I wonder how much longer the new version will be? Hopefully it'll be the 3 hr version that Mann was forced to cut by the studios.

    I don't mind expanded versions so long as the additional scenes add something that was needed to the movie. I hate these so-called Director Cuts that actually end up shorter or with only 4 added minutes.
    I´m still waiting for it to be delivered, but it´s not a 3h version... It´s not an extended version. It´s called director´s cut version or something, and it is from around the year 2000. It´s about 3-4min longer than the theatrical version, and it´s more of a re-cut, because some bits even seem to be not in it. It gets quite some flak from amazon customers, but since I have a weak spot for Michael Mann films unlike the common amazonist, I ordered it, half out of curiosity.
    And I´m hoping the music track doesn´t drone out, a problem which I experienced on several German dvds of the theatrical version.

This discussion has been closed.