It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Besides, GEWii wasn't even advertized as a Bond game, but as the new 'Goldeneye 007' game that happened to be a Bond game.
If there are so many differentials for these goldeneye reboots, they might as well have just made it to be an original title. I may pick this up but this game just isn't on my agenda, mainly because as a consumer I don't like being treated as a punk especially when the product in question is dubious to begin with. Honestly, with the new batman arkham city coming out, battlefield 3 and modern warfare 3 all being released around the same time, am I going to rush out for golden eye reloaded?? I think not!
By the way I wouldn't have any problems if the Call Of Duty gameplay was near to my James Bond videogame concept, but it isn't! I mean James Bond isn't a soldier, he is a spy and a clever one. The old Bond games (I'm talking about the EA ones for PS2, except for Rogue Agent that was aweful) were damn good, because they had everything that was in Bond style (in my opinion at least). There were Bond moments (I really loved them) and the gameplay was a mix of all the James Bond stuff.
Talking about Daniel Craig instead of Pierce Brosnan, there is only a problem and a big one. I know I can't do anything about it, but I want to tell it anyway (it's always a chitchat, isn't it?). For the people they have seen the movie (independently if they liked or not) it's almost impossible thinking to his story without thinking to the Pierce interpretation. For example, if you think to Casino Royale you'll think to the Craig personation at least a moment.
Personally I don't like Daniel Craig, but I don't have any problem seeing him in the Quantum of Solace videogame. But you must admit that is REALLY strange to see him in GoldenEye (in a story that doesn't fit to him IMHO).
It's not Craig himself the problem, it's the mix.
Every Bond must have his own story. A lot of people criticized the Agent under Fire James Bond, but in my opinion it wasn't so bad. It was a videogame with an original story with an original 007. And the voice was good, it was Bondian.
http://www.platformnation.com/2011/08/25/pax-2011-goldeneye-007-reloaded-hands-on-first-impression/
Favourable.
Now a year later and they're doing the same thing over again, and they're just adding a few small improvements and porting it over to the 360/PS3 (something I'm sure Wii owners would have to be pissed about).
After GE:RA the only way I wanted GE in the name of a Bond game again was if it was a true remake/graphical enhancement of the N64 game (something which I understand they cannot do now due to the rights held by the multiple parties) or if they took it in a new direction and made a game based off of the original Brosnan movie in a 3rd person view.
I understand Blood Stone did very poorly sales wise, but I think that was more on Activision as the only game they pushed and marketed to the public was the Goldeneye game. I enjoyed Blood Stone far more, and if they'd work to improve on some aspects and vary the gameplay a bit more it would make for one of the best and most original games since EoN.
Missa know it s goin to be worth it,as missa pretty much watchin da whole game from youtube,still wanna playin it myself.da s sayin someth.Missa m a james bond fan first and foremost and eurocom seem to be fans too.Judg from thesa effort with nightfire.