› ›

SPECTRE Production Timeline

1…536537539541542…870

Comments

  • SkyfallCraigSkyfallCraig Rome, Italy
    Posts: 630
    Nothing interesting
  • aaron819aaron819 Switzerland
    Posts: 1,208
    SkyfallCraig wrote: »
    Nothing interesting

    @SkyfallCraig Thanks
  • PanchitoPistolesPanchitoPistoles 2.0
    edited March 2015 Posts: 4,619
    ThomasCrown76 wrote: »
    Literary bond loved his Bentley, movie bond loves his Aston. It's ok with me

    Loving the Aston is one thing. I have absolutely no problem with the Aston Martin DB10. In fact, I already love it!
  • chipstickschipsticks NOT on TheDanielCraigForum where they think know Daniel Craig personally and Léa and Monica are ugly
    Posts: 560
    andmcit wrote: »
    chipsticks wrote: »
    11007993_826640727399876_1771890428_n.jpg

    11008127_782672628493052_1805257014_n.jpg
    http://websta.me/p/936378747132176989_1734660633

    I have chipsticks to thank for sharing these yesterday really!!
    :-h


    anytime :-bd
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,591
    I have absolutely no problem with the DB5 making a cameo, much like the one in TND. However I did see an AM DB6 parked at Blenheim palace. So maybe the DB6 is Bond's private car for some time? I'm sure it'll all add up.
  • Pierce2DanielPierce2Daniel
    edited March 2015 Posts: 4,408
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    Ottofuse8 wrote: »
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    The DB5 is just a cheap gimmick at this point. Bringing it back was a terrible idea, although a short cameo won't completely ruin the movie.

    Trust me, understanding the very particular situation that allows it to be brought back in this film is extremely unlikely without having read the script. It isn't just brought back arbitrarily or anything like that.

    I have read the screenplay. The way it is brought back is very uninspired, and the car's appearance is nothing more than a cheap gimmick. Having said that, I do not think it will really have a big negative impact on the overall quality of the movie, so I'm not worried.

    Christ sakes. You've really got your knives out for a film you are yet to see a frame of.

    We get it you've read the script. That does not make you the bastion of truth on these forums. The proof is in the pudding and regardless how much of the leaked materials anyone has read the truth is we are all still in the dark as to whether SP will be any good or not. The quality of the script is not indicative as to whether a film itself is any good, by all means it's a fair indicator but film is a visual medium and crap films have been made from supposed great scripts and vice versa.

    Stop condemning things till you've seen it. Yes it may not like it on the page but you never know how you will feel till you have seen it executed. I'm fully expecting you to write some pathetic excuse defending your opinion but the truth is you know I'm right. So relax, stop reviewing analysing a movie you haven't seen.

    I think I speak for a lot of people on these forums: You are getting on our nerves.

    In other news; let's marvel over Sigman a bit more:

    Stephanie+Sigman+Snap+out+of+it.png


  • RogueAgentRogueAgent
    Posts: 12,526
    aaron819 wrote: »
    Stephanie Sigman has joined the cast as Estrella

    11044555_1024787874202790_3162991968054845353_o.jpg

    Very beautiful, perhaps Bond's contact in Mexico?
  • PanchitoPistolesPanchitoPistoles 2.0
    Posts: 4,619
    @Pierce2Daniel Jesus Christ, calm down man!
    Pierce2Daniel wrote: »
    but the truth is you know I'm right.
    Are you a politician? And guess what... no, I don't know that you are right.
    Pierce2Daniel wrote: »
    Christ sakes. You've really got your knives out for a film you are yet to see a frame of.
    Yeah, this is a really sensible response to this: "Having said that, I do not think it will really have a big negative impact on the overall quality of the movie, so I'm not worried."
    Pierce2Daniel wrote: »
    The quality of the script is not indicative as to whether a film itself is any good, by all means it's a fair indicator but film is a visual medium and crap films have been made from supposed great scripts and vice versa.
    We aren't talking about the whole film. We are talking about the car. One. Car. By the way, nobody needs to read the script to see how bringing the Aston Martin DB5 back undermines the relevance of its destruction in Skyfall.

    I really do not understand why on earth do you have to become so agitated when reading some criticism. The movie won't be terrible, I love Sam Mendes, I'm sure he would direct a decent movie even if the screenplay was horrible. So don't tell me that I have my knives out for this film!
  • ZekidkZekidk
    Posts: 3,274
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    nobody needs to read the script to see how bringing the Aston Martin DB5 back undermines the relevance of its destruction in Skyfall.
    Actually, it doesn't undermine a thing, IMO. So you don't speak on my behalf. And yes, I have read the script, too.
  • aaron819aaron819 Switzerland
    Posts: 1,208
    Some Videos from shooting now in Via Panisperna:

    http://websta.me/p/937157689593910478_203169436

    http://websta.me/p/937182557554194017_12088436
  • ThomasCrown76ThomasCrown76 Augusta, ks
    Posts: 757
    I was actually expecting it to be brought back.
  • CASINOROYALECASINOROYALE Somewhere hot
    Posts: 1,003
    Reguarding the DB5, Bond has two of them. One of them issued by MI6 and one that he won in the poker game.
    The one he won in the poker game is most likely his personal car that you see on set... In the film it's made obvious that they are two different cars. The one blown up had an American steering system while the one he won in CR is a British steering system....

    It wouldn't make sense for him to just get another 1965 DB5 out of nowhere that's. Not something you can just buy lol.


    Also I would rather not have Penolope Cruz, I prefer seeing fresh unknown faces. Especially in Bond films..
    I really dislike seeing all these popular stars playing tons of different roles it's just weird to me.
  • Matt007Matt007
    Posts: 1,314
    I love the DB5 and would love it to cameo in any future Bond film. I just see it as Bonds personal car.
  • LudovicoLudovico
    Posts: 15,106
    Zekidk wrote: »
    Someone made this:
    1507013_804742519618703_7625345630966367101_n.jpg?oh=2e4cb3ce1111333d9e01bd31b7e92cf5&oe=5574030C&__gda__=1433886300_514703e280c50dbb47fe50b01648a895

    For a moment I thought it was a real one.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,195
    CASINOROYALE wrote: »
    Reguarding the DB5, Bond has two of them. One of them issued by MI6 and one that he won in the poker game.
    The one he won in the poker game is most likely his personal car that you see on set... In the film it's made obvious that they are two different cars. The one blown up had an American steering system while the one he won in CR is a British steering system....

    You beat me to the punch; this is what I was about to post. both may be his private vehicle. Bond has a thing for the DB5.
  • PanchitoPistolesPanchitoPistoles 2.0
    Posts: 4,619
    Zekidk wrote: »
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    nobody needs to read the script to see how bringing the Aston Martin DB5 back undermines the relevance of its destruction in Skyfall.
    Actually, it doesn't undermine a thing, IMO. So you don't speak on my behalf. And yes, I have read the script, too.

    Everything I write is my own opinion. Do I have to put "in my opinion" at the end of every sentence I write? The reason I strongly believe the return of Aston Martin DB5 undermines the significance of its destruction in Skfyall is this: the movie Skyfall was about the old and the new. M died, we saw the complete transformation of MI6, Bond's childhood home was blown up and Bond's personal car got destroyed too. All this signified that this is the end of an era within the story. The return of the DB5 partially invalidates this (and completely invalidates that scene where we saw how angry Bond became seeing his car getting destroyed). If the car can make a return, does that mean all that change wasn't completely for real? The return of the DB5 is not a big deal, it's just a small annoyance for me, something that never really warranted all these posts. I made a small criticism and then others completely blew it out of proportion.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,195
    DB5: “Everybody needs a hobby.”
    Blofeld: “So what's yours?”
    DB5: “Resurrection."
  • TuxedoTuxedo Europe
    Posts: 259
    DB 5 after Skyfall. Why not? It's fiction. The filmmakers can do whatever they want to do IMO. They always did. They even had false vulcanos!
  • aaron819aaron819 Switzerland
    Posts: 1,208
    Another video

    http://websta.me/p/937193996601175198_473560682
  • SeaNorseSeaNorse
    Posts: 4
    Just got back from Mexico City and they were setting up huge lighting scaffolding and building something hidden behind two screens at the National Museum of Anthropology. A guard said it was for the James Bond film.
  • aaron819aaron819 Switzerland
    Posts: 1,208
    SeaNorse wrote: »
    Just got back from Mexico City and they were setting up huge lighting scaffolding and building something hidden behind two screens at the National Museum of Anthropology. A guard said it was for the James Bond film.

    @SeaNorse Great news!! Any pictures?
  • andmcitandmcit
    Posts: 1,068
    Ludovico wrote: »
    Zekidk wrote: »
    Someone made this:
    1507013_804742519618703_7625345630966367101_n.jpg?oh=2e4cb3ce1111333d9e01bd31b7e92cf5&oe=5574030C&__gda__=1433886300_514703e280c50dbb47fe50b01648a895

    For a moment I thought it was a real one.

    you say the nicest things!! lol

    I agonised over portraying the blue LED headlights on the road ahead as the golden tones of the cars matched the background so nicely without this. See what you think:

    when%20in%20Rome%202.jpg

    I couldn't have made the composition above had it not been for the really great images being shared here! Just keep them coming and I'll be a really happy bunny!!
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    edited March 2015 Posts: 10,591
    Here is the National Museum of Anthropology.a2584__national-museum-of-anthropology.jpg143700-004-EE586B6E.jpg
    AnthropologyInside.jpg
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,195
    Very cool!
  • SeaNorseSeaNorse
    Posts: 4
    Yes I have pictures, give me a e-mail address and I will send them.
  • chipstickschipsticks NOT on TheDanielCraigForum where they think know Daniel Craig personally and Léa and Monica are ugly
    Posts: 560


    11056014_1549735451947784_80044970_n.jpg

    http://websta.me/p/937183673714818421_144856102


    video: 3 2 1 Action! Live from Rione Monti, Roma #spectre 12min


    http://websta.me/p/937223952441855464_24284658



    Via Panisperna, Rione Monti, Roma

    d4a17fcc88a717223b4c6b8ac6bb906f.jpg



    83d3c311e68ec9754ecdd284e0bba2a9.jpg
  • JCRendleJCRendle
    Posts: 1,552
    SeaNorse wrote: »
    Yes I have pictures, give me a e-mail address and I will send them.
    Can't you post them here for everyone to see?

  • chipstickschipsticks NOT on TheDanielCraigForum where they think know Daniel Craig personally and Léa and Monica are ugly
    Posts: 560
    10994986_1417215951911787_2071080617_n.jpg


    11024144_1613207518910622_1831973610_n.jpg
    http://websta.me/p/930258083497168504_24284658

  • SeaNorseSeaNorse
    Posts: 4
    Have them on my desktop but I can't drag them into the comment box. Want to send them, you can see they are getting ready to light that giant waterfall.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,591
    SeaNorse wrote: »
    Have them on my desktop but I can't drag them into the comment box. Want to send them, you can see they are getting ready to light that giant waterfall.
    Can't you just copy/paste?
Sign In or Register to comment.