SPECTRE Production Timeline

1554555557559560870

Comments

  • Posts: 1,407
    Really digging the black and white version
  • JWPepperJWPepper You sit on it, but you can't take it with you.
    Posts: 512
    I like it. Simple but very classy.
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,546
    I'm always thrilled to see the PPK rather than whatever modern nonsense!
    I like it! Thanks for posting HD versions of the black and white, I can't seem to find them over here. 007.com isn't updating with he posters for me.
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    Did anyone say something about the six-page complaint? Well, I'm not part of it. :D

    I am assured this is going to be Craig's best Bond film! :D

    ...so far!

    That was me and yes, I'm in agreement SP is shaping up to be Craig's best. Not even SF while it was in production comes close to giving me the strong vibes SP is giving me.
  • edited March 2015 Posts: 3,274
    .
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    jake24 wrote: »
    I don't know what to make of it. Too minimalistic.

    Imo this is following a trend that became very apparent with SF. Anyone with a passing interest in film posters (and for that matter DVD/Blu-Ray covers) will know of, or at least recognise the homogenisation of posters by genre. All rom-com posters follow the same set of rules, the same with YA, horror etc. What they've been doing with Bond is not forcing 'genre'. It's minimal, it's slick, it doesn't give the audience the excuse to pass up because 'they don't like the look of it'. After all a poster is translated as more than just an image and for a lot of people will be their point of entry. My mum will see the poster a thousand times on buses, but probably won't catch the trailer. You don't have to love it, but you can't be offended by the SF and now SP artwork. All you're effectively told is, Bond is back. No colours to add a tone to the film, no images to add context. You have to go see the movie to satisfy your curiosity. Yeah, it's not going to sit pretty alongside the classics of old, but I can see the reason for this stark approach.
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    The poster also reminds me of

    9b05249f3da37bafe35ddef4cf3b4082.jpg
  • Posts: 4,408
    I liked it at initial glance. It's stark, simple and plain cool. The problem though is that it isn't really a 'teaser poster' in the traditional sense and more simply just a photo of Daniel Craig pouting and holding a gun(which we have seen a lot of over the last 9 years of his tenure). There is nothing to distinguish and define SP from any of Craig's other 3 films based on this teaser. It's a shame because the SP announcement poster had a haunting and evocative quality which is totally absent from this poster.

    It's simplicity is commendable, but I feel it lacks creativity.

    Craig does look great though, instantly I thought of Moore in LALD. Also he is giving off a serious Steve McQueen vibe, which I feel was also very intentional.

    4100YGenWUL._SY445_.jpg

    Bullitt-Unforgettable-Steve-McQueen.jpg
  • chipstickschipsticks NOT on TheDanielCraigForum where they think know Daniel Craig personally and Léa and Monica are ugly
    Posts: 560
  • Posts: 150

    RC7 wrote: »
    jake24 wrote: »
    I don't know what to make of it. Too minimalistic.

    Imo this is following a trend that became very apparent with SF. Anyone with a passing interest in film posters (and for that matter DVD/Blu-Ray covers) will know of, or at least recognise the homogenisation of posters by genre. All rom-com posters follow the same set of rules, the same with YA, horror etc. What they've been doing with Bond is not forcing 'genre'. It's minimal, it's slick, it doesn't give the audience the excuse to pass up because 'they don't like the look of it'. After all a poster is translated as more than just an image and for a lot of people will be their point of entry. My mum will see the poster a thousand times on buses, but probably won't catch the trailer. You don't have to love it, but you can't be offended by the SF and now SP artwork. All you're effectively told is, Bond is back. No colours to add a tone to the film, no images to add context. You have to go see the movie to satisfy your curiosity. Yeah, it's not going to sit pretty alongside the classics of old, but I can see the reason for this stark approach.

    agreed RC7, but it goes beyond me why they wouldn't bother with even a slightly more interesting font, without stealing focus from DC

  • edited March 2015 Posts: 1,068
    Totally underwhelmed by the blandness of it. Disappointing. Is there a subtle something in there somewhere almost hidden to suggest a back story?
  • Posts: 1,314
    I like it. Why?

    its contemporary, confident and shows the extent to which the public hold Craig as Bond. 2 of his 3 films hold a 90%+ rating on Rotten Tomatoes and were critically adored. It will also appeal to both sexes.

    Really, at this stage all you need to know about the new Bond film is that its in production, and that Craig is in it. He now owns the role moreso than anyone since Connery.

    Thats a strong brand right there.
  • edited March 2015 Posts: 11,189
    Meh

    Preferred the first one. The clothes look camp on Craig IMO.
  • TuxedoTuxedo Europe
    Posts: 259
    Great poster! Blue eyes in the blach and white version too.
  • Ludovico wrote: »
    manfercas wrote: »
    This is really lazy

    How so? It's a tease poster. Not a trailer. How much more could they show?

    I'm not saying they should show any revealing elements, but when it comes to Bond, there are a lot of established elements that could be added (like the gun barrel in Skyfall's tease). I think that, unlike past teaser posters, the gray shades aren't contrasting enough, making it look plain, increasingly more so by the bohemian writer's outfit they chose . And lastly, the lack of any background or actual movement by Bond makes it look a bit like a fan made poster.

    I dont't think it's bad, just not as good as the previous ones in the Craig era.
  • Posts: 15,106
    Matt007 wrote: »
    I like it. Why?

    its contemporary, confident and shows the extent to which the public hold Craig as Bond. 2 of his 3 films hold a 90%+ rating on Rotten Tomatoes and were critically adored. It will also appeal to both sexes.

    Really, at this stage all you need to know about the new Bond film is that its in production, and that Craig is in it. He now owns the role moreso than anyone since Connery.

    Thats a strong brand right there.

    That pretty much sums it up.

    And like I said, it is nice to see Bond not in a suit but in operation clothes.
  • edited March 2015 Posts: 3,164
    Trailer for March 28 confirmed:
    @SonyPicturesSG: Here is the official SPECTRE teaser poster. Watch out for the first trailer on 28 Mar.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Matt007 wrote: »
    Thats a strong brand right there.

    I think this is the angle they're going for. It's fine in my eyes, you can't really hate something containing so little to offend you, but it's not something I'd buy and hang on my wall, the same way I wouldn't buy a poster of a perfume ad, but it'll sell 'the product'. That's the world we live in now, unfortunately.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    I love it. Craig looks awesome. Love the LALD look too. He looks his best since Casino Royale.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,591
    I wonder why the white versions don't include "experience it in IMAX".
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Getting better and better!! :D
  • DomesticKittenDomesticKitten Blofeld's Lap
    Posts: 29
    antovolk wrote: »
    Trailer for March 28 confirmed:
    @SonyPicturesSG: Here is the official SPECTRE teaser poster. Watch out for the first trailer on 28 Mar.

    Now I am just even more glad my mates wanna go and see Furious 7 opening night!
  • HMBFFHMBFF Lisboa, Portugal
    edited March 2015 Posts: 204
    'Who Wore It Better?' - Bond Edition

    LALD%20Vs.%20SP_zpsfvsomtkw.png
  • Posts: 3,164
    jake24 wrote: »
    I wonder why the white versions don't include "experience it in IMAX".

    IDK. Sony Russia tweeted out the colour one sheet version with the IMAX text. Just some inconsistency across which of the (ultimately) many versions they have with the November date, generic with just coming soon, IMAX, no IMAX...
  • JWPepperJWPepper You sit on it, but you can't take it with you.
    Posts: 512
    antovolk wrote: »
    Trailer for March 28 confirmed:
    @SonyPicturesSG: Here is the official SPECTRE teaser poster. Watch out for the first trailer on 28 Mar.

    Cool! Thanks!
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Each for its own era.
  • Posts: 11,189
    No comparison, Roger's look is more convincing.
  • Posts: 725
    Matt007 wrote: »
    I like it. Why?

    its contemporary, confident and shows the extent to which the public hold Craig as Bond. 2 of his 3 films hold a 90%+ rating on Rotten Tomatoes and were critically adored. It will also appeal to both sexes.

    Really, at this stage all you need to know about the new Bond film is that its in production, and that Craig is in it. He now owns the role moreso than anyone since Connery.

    Thats a strong brand right there.

    Exactly. All good points. This is about marketing, not art. Spectre is competing against a ton of spy films, some major, opening just weeks and days in some countries before it opens. They are selling Craig as Bond. As long as he is Bond, he is their Brand, and they are going to their strength. What do the critics expect, pretty snowy mountain tops to sell Spectre.

    Spectre also has had to fight off a ton of crappy press items due to the Sony leaks, with the press using the leaks to bash the script, the locations, the budget, name it. Now we're in the middle of the Mexico "scandal," as if no other films have had to deal with governments and their demands to get budget breaks. The Sony leaks have been a killer. The film better be good, because the press will be out for blood and will use and twist the leaks for everything they can drain from them.
  • edited March 2015 Posts: 3,274
    chipsticks wrote: »
    Okay. So according to the article...
    - the PTS will be 10 minutes max
    - there will also be scenes with a helicopter
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    No comparison, Roger's look is more convincing.

    Indeed. Effortlessly cool.
Sign In or Register to comment.