It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
:))
One would think so, yes, but, well...
Yes, most in the media know, I'm sure. General public (by which I don't mean Bond fans) can't even be expected to know, so they'll just go with what the media presents them with.
I'll need to get my act together and read a bunch of Russell Crowe interviews, been thinking about doing it for a while, but haven't had the time, yet... :P He seems like a pretty relaxed dude in general.
Anyway... I quite liked the GQ piece myself - nothing deep or revealing or new, but still. But he is just generally uneasy and defensive with the media (interviews, but also paparazzi and fans and stuff), he hasn't really managed to relax, yet - maybe he never will, who knows. I'd like to see that happen.
http://www.hitfix.com/the-dartboard/ant-man-the-daniel-craig-controversy-fandemonium-10
discussion about Daniel starts about 6:50 in.
I really would like this guy to interview Daniel
I'm ready for the film and some positive posts.
But what to do with 16 more days what to do 8-X
:))
Daniel in Cyprus for Unmass
Certainly, I don't really care - as I've said numerous times, all Craig ‘has’ to give is his best performance as an actor, that's it.
But I do understand where people are coming from when they say they would like him to be a bit more courteous. His (often misquoted) sarcasm and being profane & scornful of the silly proportions his kind of fame brings is all fine & well - and I see his point – but he is often far more defensive than he needs to be.
Just saying once (or twice) that the press are a lousy bunch of c***s is enough – you don’t have to hammer it home in every third sentence.
But I also agree that this discussion is getting a tad boring…
It's an action movie. He does his own stunts. He even required surgery because of said stunts. I'm sure he got tired of every other production, too. Do you get tired after a long days work? I'm assuming yes, right? So then does that mean you'll go in the next day and quit?
I think not.
Point taken ...we are all like kids on a long car trip "are we there yet? ..I'm hungry!! ...Jason bit me!! ...Mom!!!"
=))
That Daniel Craig what a horrible, money orientated diva eh!. Hope those who slated the guy feel pretty bad that all the time they were doing so he was out their in landmine field raising awareness. Wonder how the Daily Mail will spin this story probably a headline of DANIEL CRAIG LAYS DOWN LANDMINE IN LATEST SUICIDE ATTEMPT.
This f#¤%&@£ landmine won t blow up!
The Tag line should be "Sony Silence Daniel Craig"
You simply can't say such things, an actor in such a high profile role should know better.
Obviously he has to learn the hard way.
I hope he'll not do any interviews right after shoots anymore.
Doesn't work though as he is not common man.
He is very rich movie star.
And even common man doesn't swear this much
Maybe drunk common man.
Jason it was sarcastic humour get a grip man, change the record.
It was a response to Germanlady, my bad didn't @ here.
I love sarcasm, I know sarcasm, I am a walking sarcasm and I just changed my record to Get a Grip by Aerosmith as you told me
:)
Ah right apologies.
BTW For everyone with a problem Craig's language. Fleming apparently swore like a trooper. He would have put it in the novels if he could have got away with it at the time.
I don't know how anyone gets this idea based on what he's said.
No Bond actor has been as physically involved in the role as much as DC. He deserves leeway when asked about doing another Bond in the aftermath of such a grueling shoot.
What uneducated drivel. Daniel Craig was hailed by critics for the Spielberg directed Road to Perdition opposite Hanks. He played supporting roles next Kidman in the Invasion and Jolie in Tomb Raider. Further more he was a hit with critics in Spielbergs Munich he was always going to be a leading man if not Bond it would have been something else. You have no idea, your going by a mainstream newspaper interpretation of comments made in jest. Your just jumping on the hate Dan band wagon. Let me guess your favourite Bond is Brosnan and Bond should have dark hair and be tall and speak like Stephen Fry.. a way and bile yer heid.
So Bond did indeed put him on the map with a lot of people, at least outside England.
I have a feeling post-Bond that he will go back to smaller fare, and not be all that mainstream. Just a feeling I have. The only other 'franchise' he has at the moment is the excellent Girl with the Dragon Tattoo line....and that hasn't been going anywhere, sadly.
Bond is so not DC when you think about it.....and unfortunately, he's letting everyone know that (perhaps unintentionally) slowly but surely in drips and drabs in his interviews. Hollywood can be such a cruel place sometimes (including the paparazzi).
Because I have seen it time and time again. Those unaccepting of Craig of Bond will jump on the band wagon when the opportunity arises to criticise him either as Bond, person or actor. I tend to find those same people are those who are the ones who wanted more Brosnan, didn't want a reboot or dont feel Craig has right look for Bond and can't wait for him to go in the hope they get what they call a "Bondonian" looking actor. It's pathetic the guy said nothing wrong in that interview, and cares what happens to the franchise after he leaves but because he doesn't speak like a public school boy he gets comments from mugs who by what the daily mail print. Shocking uneducated shameful behaviour of so called fans, some of the keyboard terrorists on here need to get their facts right and not let reading tabloids own take sway their opinion for them.
He looks to really enjoy doing it, and it doesn't look like he is just waiting for a pay check. I really hate all those articles making people think he is quitting the role all the sudden. I've even hard more people say that Idris Elba is gonna be the next one. My reaction is just like: Give me a break. DC isn't done until it's officially said by EON. Let the man just have some time with his family then he'll soon be back.
The HitFlix video said everything perfectly. DC is getting the same question all the time on his interviews. "When are you making the next Bond? Are you leaving the role? Who should to it next? When's the next one out?" Of course he is gonna say he rather slash his wrists than answer anymore of those questions. Because he is not the one to know, just yet that is. There really aren't that many interviewers asking questions about the making of this film and where character is at this point? Those are always the ones that interest me the most. Because you can get some great answers out of him. I read one not too long ago where he mentioned he would get ideas during nights and write them down for Sam and so forth.
I don't like Craig's era, but if his successor were blonde, I would him the same chance(s) that I gave Craig. I'm not as rigid on the hair colour. So long as it isn't blue or green (or something like that), I don't really care whether the next Bond has black, brown, blonde or ginger hair.
https://uk.screen.yahoo.com/makes-spectre-bigger-better-skyfall-092006259.html
The poor guy already looks exhausted. :(