› ›

Daniel Craig lashes out at ‘idiot’ Kardashians

forgotmyusernameforgotmyusername
edited December 2011 in Actors Posts: 2,782
showing a mean but truthful streak - DC has a go at the highest paid escort in Hollywood and her pimp mum.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2067753/Daniel-Craig-launches-foul-mouthed-rant-f--ing-idiots-Kardashians-making-career-private-lives.html
«13

Comments

  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Good interview. Say what you want about Dan but he says things we all think are true too, it is just that no one wants to man up. Congratulations to him and Rachel and let them forever be happy. If he wants his privacy why can't he get it? Just because he is a celebrity doesn't make his privacy any less valuable than the rest of us. I see where his anger about the idiots is coming from. I'd be angry too.
  • TrueMiracle85TrueMiracle85
    Posts: 300
    I was reading about this on another forum. Let's just say Daniel Craig picked up many more fans today. ;) He tells it like it is, for sure.
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,847
    Daniel has my respect. Heck I just picked up a pair of sneakers that are similar to what he wore as bond in the madagascar chase in casino royale
  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    Posts: 4,399
    Danny just leveled up lol...

    I absolutely hate them (the Kardashians) because they have done absolutely nothing to earn their status in life - they were born into wealth already, and decided to whore themselves to the public to make even more... not one ounce of blood, sweat, or tears went into their success - and yet, there is still a percentage of this country that actually watches that worthless trio, and actually give a damn about what they have to say... and then to make statements about privacy - F that!... you sold your soul long ago, now you deal with whatever gets thrown your way... If you really wanted your own privacy, you could have it - how often is Tom Hanks in the news?.... people like the Kardashians who live their lives in the tabloids get exactly what they deserve...

    i agree with Mr Craig 1000%
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,355
    Craig seems to tell it like it is and I love him for that. Best of us, this man is James Bond!
  • fanbond123fanbond123
    edited December 2011 Posts: 1,661
    I bet he fancies Kim though. She has a big booty!

    Bit of useless trivia...

    The Kardashian's father - now deceased - was one of OJ Simpson's lawyers during his trial for murder.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    edited December 2011 Posts: 14,585
    Now let's all raise a martini and make a toast to Dan the man for his honest opinion. Spot-on.
  • Baltimore_007Baltimore_007
    Posts: 5,634
    I almost went into a four word tirade myself when I saw the amount of commercials flashing away and less than interesting immaterial 'celebrity' gossip on the link page

    So, Craig got caught out having a bash at something or someone, said a few naughty words and some tabloid makes a big meal of it, sometimes it's good to vent your frustrations and I kind of applaud Craig for his thoughts and feelings on said issue.

    You could never imagine say Moore or Dalton having a go in their time with bones of contention they had with anything of the day, at least not to the extremes here or what I can recall
  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    Posts: 4,399
    some men are just more blunt than others...

    and i don't think he's worried about burning any bridges with Kardashians either lol.
  • KerimKerim Istanbul Not Constantinople
    Posts: 2,629
    Bravo Dan. The Kardashians are indeed ******* idiots, especially (Miss Universe Drama Queen) Kim.

    I honestly can't think of anything more embarassing in the US today.
  • FromCanadaWithLoveFromCanadaWithLove Canada
    Posts: 612
    I'm totally with Craig on this one, I like everything to be said as it is. As much as I don't give a **** about the Kardashians, they're in the same business as him, so he has every right to pass judgement.

    He seems like a pretty honest guy. No problems here.
  • karatemanchan37karatemanchan37
    Posts: 584
    On behalf of all Americans in this country, I would apologize for the general stupidity (and stupid people) that has come out from the USA. This would include the Kardashians, Jersey Shore, Al Sharpton, and whomever else that fits.

    Do keep in mind, however, that all of us not that stupid. :)>-
  • FromCanadaWithLoveFromCanadaWithLove Canada
    Posts: 612
    karatemanchan37 wrote:
    On behalf of all Americans in this country, I would apologize for the general stupidity (and stupid people) that has come out from the USA. This would include the Kardashians, Jersey Shore, Al Sharpton, and whomever else that fits.

    Do keep in mind, however, that all of us not that stupid. :)>-

    I guess I have to apologize on Canada's behalf for Celine Dion and Justin Bieber. Sorry for the deafening, chaps.

  • VirageVirage
    Posts: 1,856
    Go Daniel,Go Daniel,Go Daniel,Go Daniel, go!
  • WillardWhyteWillardWhyte Midnight Society #ProjectMoon
    Posts: 784
    Bravo Craig, glad to hear it the way so many of us feel about it.

    P.S. Justin Bieber is horrible
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,585
    In contrast with my previous comment, Craig (or anyone else, for that matter) merely mentioning the Kardashian name unfortunately brings them publicity- and apparently there's no such thing as bad publicity.
  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    Posts: 4,399
    Kardashians = no bad publicity

    Penn State = bad publicity
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    Excellent read. Daniel's comment on them being "****ing idiots" is hilarious.

    His interview was very unique, makes him sound like an even more interesting person to talk to, one-on-one, than I previously thought.
  • shadowonthesunshadowonthesun Banned
    Posts: 1,894
    Here's a crazy idea: put Kim Kardashian in a Bond film. As herself. But there's a catch - the part is written in such a way that Kardashian is making fun of herself ... but doesn't know it.

    Allow me to explain:

    Back when it was annouced that Bond would visit Dubai in Carte Blanche, a lot of people were thinking that the city would be portrayed as Disneyland for grown-ups; a shallow, tacky place that was all style and no substance which Bond would instantly dislike. It didn't happen, but it did get me thinking - where else in the world would Bond find somewhere for which he held utter disdain?

    The answer? Hollywood.

    I think Bond would find Hollywood repulsive, and I also think it would make for an interesting setting, especially if we got into the dark underbelly of the place. I'm thinking Mexican drug cartels, celebrity scandals and trendy Scientology-style cults. Putting someone like Kardashian in the role of a spoiled starlet who interferes with Bond's assignment would be a bold move, but one that I think would work really well. The only problem is that the internet would probably take physical form and lambast EON for it.
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    Kim K is hot as Hell but she has no place in a Bond film in any capacity. Damn, to think all this Kardashian plastering really came from her crappy sex tape with ray-j.
  • shadowonthesunshadowonthesun Banned
    Posts: 1,894
    But that's the beauty of it, @doubleoego - it works simply because she doesn't belong.


    Anyway, every time I see or hear the name "Kim Kardashian" (or someone else whose name has been mis-spelled with a 'K' instead of a 'C'), I think of this:

  • GermanladyGermanlady
    Posts: 6,601
    QBranch wrote:
    In contrast with my previous comment, Craig (or anyone else, for that matter) merely mentioning the Kardashian name unfortunately brings them publicity- and apparently there's no such thing as bad publicity.

    Dunno - it comes in a bad moment for them. Kim got bashed badly for her short marriage and they are not in the zenit of their popularity. Guess more and more people really see, how little substance there is and might move on.
  • mikebravo008mikebravo008
    Posts: 20
    Wow, I didn't know he'd be that aggressive in real life. Kudos to DC and all the very best to him for SkyFall and all other movies.
  • shadowonthesunshadowonthesun Banned
    Posts: 1,894
    I don't think he's natraully aggressive - he just speaks his mind, and he thinks little of the Kardashians.
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,582
    FromCanadaWithLove wrote:
    karatemanchan37 wrote:
    On behalf of all Americans in this country, I would apologize for the general stupidity (and stupid people) that has come out from the USA. This would include the Kardashians, Jersey Shore, Al Sharpton, and whomever else that fits.

    Do keep in mind, however, that all of us not that stupid. :)>-

    I guess I have to apologize on Canada's behalf for Celine Dion and Justin Bieber. Sorry for the deafening, chaps.

    And on behalf of Great Britain may I apologise for Katie Price..no one else, just Katie Price.
  • shadowonthesunshadowonthesun Banned
    Posts: 1,894
    NicNac wrote:
    FromCanadaWithLove wrote:
    karatemanchan37 wrote:
    On behalf of all Americans in this country, I would apologize for the general stupidity (and stupid people) that has come out from the USA. This would include the Kardashians, Jersey Shore, Al Sharpton, and whomever else that fits.

    Do keep in mind, however, that all of us not that stupid. :)>-
    I guess I have to apologize on Canada's behalf for Celine Dion and Justin Bieber. Sorry for the deafening, chaps.
    And on behalf of Great Britain may I apologise for Katie Price..no one else, just Katie Price.
    On behalf of Australia, I apologise for Tony Abbott, Kyle Sandilands and Andrew Bolt.
  • SaintMarkSaintMark
    Posts: 7,653
    Too bas that DC needs to slam other folks, even if they are attention seeking crazy people. I am dissapointed he felt the need to add to the attention these folks have these days.
    I respect his own fight for privacy but find it strange he needs to disrespect the unwanted privacy some folks do want to have. Some folks love being the center of attention and I say good on them.
  • 002002
    Posts: 581
    Kim Kardiashian= her arse is more talented than the rest of her put together...
  • fanbond123fanbond123
    edited December 2011 Posts: 1,661
    It was in an interview for a magazine, I think? He's not the first Bond actor to use a magazine interview to be critical about people. After he was replaced, Brosnan said a few nasty things about Eon in a Playboy magazine interview. Used the f word. Oops.

    Daniel speaks his mind, nothing wrong with that, but at least he's not as bad as Jeremy Clarkson. On BBC's One Show he said striking public sector workers should be shot!

    Clarkson is crazy or an attention seeker. Or both! ;)
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    edited December 2011 Posts: 13,978
    I'm not taking thier side, but dropping no less than 4 f-bombs (much less than usual for him, maybe he had a painful mouth ulcer) doesn't exactly make him any better than them. He could've just kept his mouth shut, or replied by asking: who?. By doing this, isn't he giving them what they crave?
Sign In or Register to comment.