It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Yes, that would be how I would view it too, Barry. No need to overcomplicate matters with prequels or time travel!
Don't forget Mr. Somerset in FRWL! And in the novel of TMWTGG he called himself Mark Hazard.
And Sir Hilary Bray in both the novel and film of OHMSS. James Boldman was a John Gardner novels staple alias too.
Burt Saxby
Klaus Hergescheimer
Evel Kenievel
Charles Morton, manufacturers' representative from Leeds
Mr. van Bierk
@Dragonpol approved of that line, for obvious reasons! ;)
Ugandans have exceptionally good hearing. Its a well documented fact.
And something else exceptional as well but we wont go into that.
Yes, amongst those of the population that Idi Amin didn't cut the ears off anyway.
ok thx well you are probably right Craig timeline is one on it´s own and i feel that the Craig Movies took a darker and more seriousness over the Connery/Moore Movies Brosnans where also a bit darker but not like Danile Craigs
Jesus I actually remember when that used to royally piss me off! Now I barely bat an eyelid.
Those were such innocent days before they released SP weren't they?
I have never accepted the notion that the DB5 which Bond wins in CR is meant to be the same as the one in GF and TB. First of all, it has left-hand drive. Then of course, the GF/TB car has a 1963 registration, BMT216A. Now even the GE/TND car is not identical since its registration is BMT214A (also 1963), and there is also no indication that the latter has "all the usual refinements", or Bond wouldn't have needed (well, he didn't, actually) the shitty Z3 supposedly equipped with Stinger missiles.
Now I realise that the revival of BMT216A (by the way, a reminiscence that everyone loved when I saw SKYFALL in theatres, causing actual applause in the middle of the performance!) makes things more complicated, but still I never attributed it to Q section taking Dimitrios' car apart, converting it to right-hand drive and then outfitting it with those gadgets, complete with Dymo tape markings, before registering in the UK for the first time with a 1963 license plate when it was already after 2006.
However logical that stuff may be regarding this latter-day BMT216A, for me the Dimitrios car clearly is an entirely different vehicle that never appeared in the series before or after CR.
it will be interesting to see if Bond meets Spectre again in this timeline since Blofeld wasn´t killed adn when in that case.
but do you guys, Think that this next Bond Movie will be Craigs last?
Yes I think so,if he even makes this one.
He is ageing very fast now, B25 cant really afford to be delayed if they want him to star in it.
He must have caught progeria.
I've never noticed that that line is repeated!
Yes, Connery has the same wobble in TB-YOLT-DAF. And the gunbarrel music for YOLT is the zenith of the series.
P&W should have learned from The Phantom Menace that blood-based stories just don't work.
What kind of lighter does Bond use exactly in the early films (Connery and Lazenby)?
Is it Ronson as in the novels or a Dunhill?
I'm trying to identify the lighter he used in Dr. No (gunmetal black?) but I can't come to a conclusion.
Dunhill Broadboy Mrk II PAT.No440072 very rare. Was 3 variations the one Bond uses in Dr No is the case fit model.