It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
https://markoconnell.co.uk/a-farewell-to-arms-boyle-bails-from-bond-at-the-007th-hour/
Dalton and Glen actually feuded toward the end of production on LTK. They never worked together on CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS: THE DISCOVERY; Dalton left the production when the Salkinds hired Glen without consulting him (Dalton had stipulated in his contract that he would have a say in who directed).
But yes, Craig may be a big part of the problem here. He did not get along with Campbell (and could well have vetoed the idea of inviting him back for QOS) or Mendes.
Yes, amazing, two bad screenwriters (plus the "leftist" Paul Haggis), one incompetent director, and it's one of the most popular entries in the fracnhise. As Mr Henslow put it: "It's a mystery!"
I'd be perfectly fine with this also. Hiddleston and Bier make a good team.
---
It's obviously too early to speculate about a recast at this point, even though it would be my preference. Let's see what they do in the next month or so in terms of fixing this mess. I hope they take their time and get this right rather than rush to churn out some half a$$#d effort. That never works well.
As I said earlier, a possible issue now is buzz. Would this be seen as another tainted and stained production before release? There's too much at stake for that. I wish them well
Given the competitive set and the success of the long form, the time is right to look at the whole thing.
eon have clung on to this superhero blockbuster nonsense for way too long to the detriment of allowing somebody to bring Fleming's Bond, preferably in period guise, to the big and, or small screen !
Indeed. I have read in certain places that Brosnan had a couple of battles with Tamahori and Spottiswoode whilst he was Bond, but Babs and co always ended up siding with the director, for better or worse. It definitely seems that they have flipped it around for Craig, though.
Thank the lord this is his last movie. I shall be looking forward to Bond 26 a lot more than I am this.
Whoa. This is the first I'm hearing of Craig having disputes with Campbell. What happened there?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/08/22/danny-boyle-quits-bond-dispute-films-russian-villain/
Boyle wanted to cast Tomasz Kot as the villain but Craig vetoed it. So Boyle bailed.
Eon are also unhappy with the overly political tone of the script and its Russia themes. Though, this is disputed.
Apparently, Boyle was sacked.
It seems as though Barbara never wanted John Hodge on the movie. They may go back to the P&W script which is described as more traditional.
Source?
Politics ruin everything
Or some rewriting... (if its even true).
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/08/22/danny-boyle-quits-bond-dispute-films-russian-villain/
This came up earlier in the thread (I'll see if I can find the post and add it here as an edit). Basically Campbell was a strict taskmaster on CR, and Craig did not like his approach. Campbell wanted to direct QOS but was not asked back; he suspects it was because of Craig.
This was not reported by the press -- it was included in a Facebook post by someone in the industry who spoke to Campbell at an event, so make of that what you will.
Just speculation among members here.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/08/22/danny-boyle-quits-bond-dispute-films-russian-villain/
The article mentions that the Purvis/Wade script was already finished. Hmm. That's the first I have heard of that. If so, that adds a wrinkle to this story.
I know some will have an emotional breakdown if this happens, but do not be surprised if Mendes is brought in to "save the day." That's the only type of scenario in which I can see him returning. I'd be OK with it if Mendes sticks to the script and doesn't turn it into another self-indulgent project like SP. I like Mendes as a director, though he seems full of himself--which means he'd be apt to saying, "You need ME to come in their and save Bond 25? Of course you do."
Also, How do they mean "left-field"?
Only as much as Tom Cruise in M:I, but I guess that doesn’t suit certain agendas.
The article talks about Boyle’ film having an usual theme - such as Bond incarcerated. And Boyle talks about updating Bind to the “MeToo” era. Love to know what that could be.
Maybe they were going to update the basic FRWL story by having a Russian honey trap get Bond jailed for sexual assault? And, maybe replaced by Elba as acting-007, but is really a Russian agent.
Sound good? or worth sacking the Director for coming up with such nonsense?
Someone's been throwing the toys out of the pram.
pretty sorry state of affairs for everyone involved really
Australia is in the commonwealth.
And Lazenby was an Aussie so we've had Aussie Bond already - another taboo broken