Who should/could be a Bond actor?

112501251125212531255

Comments

  • Posts: 15
    I think Jeff just bought a $1Bn headache. There's no Bond for him.
  • Posts: 185
    I'd be ok with Hoult, if Turner and Cavill were out of the running.

    gettyimages-1172503183.jpg

    I think he could age into the part.

    He looks good for the part!
  • zebrafishzebrafish <°)))< in Octopussy's garden in the shade
    Posts: 4,370
    Hoult is the better actor than Turner, I would be happy with him becoming Bond.
  • buddyoldchapbuddyoldchap Formerly known as JeremyBondon
    Posts: 246
    zebrafish wrote: »
    Hoult is the better actor than Turner, I would be happy with him becoming Bond.

    No suprise perhaps, but I find the opposite to be true. Hoult does nothing for me, he's never convincing to me. His appearance does nothing for me either, a strange face, like a toddler who never grew up.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,102
    zebrafish wrote: »
    Hoult is the better actor than Turner, I would be happy with him becoming Bond.

    Much more film experience too which I think would be appealing for them.
  • Posts: 6,755
    I wouldn’t be against Hoult. He has acting chops.
  • buddyoldchapbuddyoldchap Formerly known as JeremyBondon
    Posts: 246
    Yeah, no.

    R.4337aa68875aef7ffe18379f3f03869e?rik=bc4rRE8FQp73Vw&riu=http%3a%2f%2fstarschanges.com%2fwp-content%2fuploads%2f2016%2f06%2fnicholas-hoult-height-weight-age.jpg&ehk=Pp6WPrWBRAnbw9uhXkjaEODcbRiL3z0eD4paaj%2fpcW8%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0

    acb0cf4040ea-fifteenlove260722smstills-0022.jpg
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited 3:55pm Posts: 17,102
    Yeah, he looks about right, and more importantly he's a very capable film actor.
    That photo above is about ten years old so he's obviously matured since then, and he looks good in it anyway.

    Here's a more up-to-date one from last year; if you told me this guy was Bond I wouldn't be upset.

    nicholas-hoult-covers-the-latest-2024-men-of-the-year-issue-v0-5dmbcgol9a2e1.jpg?width=1198&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=492dd7403b69091f6e10fceef19a44d115ffb88c
  • Posts: 6,755
    One or the other would be a win. One more than the other, depending on who you’d ask. But I’m sure we’d all agree that both would be fine choices.
  • buddyoldchapbuddyoldchap Formerly known as JeremyBondon
    edited 3:57pm Posts: 246
    mtm wrote: »
    Yeah, he looks about right, and more importantly he's a very capable film actor.
    That photo above is about ten years old so he's obviously matured since then, and he looks good in it anyway.

    He still looks like he wets the bed. To each his own though.

    Nicholas-Hoult-Its-Always-Burberry-Weather-Campaign-2025.jpg

    Nope.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,102
    mtm wrote: »
    Yeah, he looks about right, and more importantly he's a very capable film actor.
    That photo above is about ten years old so he's obviously matured since then, and he looks good in it anyway.

    He still looks like he wets the bed.

    Yes dear.
  • Posts: 6,755
    I think Hoult could really grow old in the role. Guy’s a bit too tall, but a very fine actor, with a good rep, a good guy all around, and he now has the maturity and the physicality for it. I would be happy with him being Bond.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,366
    One thing that this topic has shown, it’s too easy to cherry pick, and post, unflattering photos.

    I would not be against Hoult
  • Posts: 4,646
    I think it's a fair assumption that Amazon will want someone who is more deeply involved/committed to the "universe" (I know some people hate that word), based purely on the greater frequency of anticipated movies, possible/likely spin offs, global promotion, merchandise etc etc, the days of taking 2 or 3 years out to relax or star in "pet projects" are possibly gone. How this will change casting, I'm not sure but "it's a young man's game", they will want 100% commitment for 8-10 years
  • buddyoldchapbuddyoldchap Formerly known as JeremyBondon
    Posts: 246
    Men with baby sized noses are an instant no from yours truly. Sorry Nicholas.
  • Posts: 6,755
    Men with baby sized noses are an instant no from yours truly. Sorry Nicholas.

    My friend, considering everything is up in the air now, we will be lucky to have someone close enough to what Bond has been for the last 60 years.
  • Posts: 15,381
    007HallY wrote: »
    Coming back here after months, but do we think that everything that has been said about the next Bond by BB and MGW is out the window now? Specifically their age requirement?

    Perhaps. But honestly, I'm not sure there's some inevitable casting choice they'll make, even with this development. At the moment I think there's so many different interpretations of Amazon getting creative control and much of it is contradictory in regards to casting. Ask one person and they'd say it's a guarantee the next Bond won't be played by a white actor. Others will claim it's a guarantee he will be. Same with how famous the actors are, or their age, or if they'll be American.

    It's going to be a populist choice, someone people can easily see in the role like Brosnan in the 90's. Amazon realise how weary the fans are, they have to do something popular and not rock the boat, Just look at The Force Awakens.

    My wild guess it's probably be a Brosnan-like choice, or at least that's what Amazon will try to do. But we are no longer in the 90s and I don't think there's a candidate that can be plebiscited like Brosnan was at the time.

    But my main worry now is the script.
  • Posts: 4,628
    Ludovico wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Coming back here after months, but do we think that everything that has been said about the next Bond by BB and MGW is out the window now? Specifically their age requirement?

    Perhaps. But honestly, I'm not sure there's some inevitable casting choice they'll make, even with this development. At the moment I think there's so many different interpretations of Amazon getting creative control and much of it is contradictory in regards to casting. Ask one person and they'd say it's a guarantee the next Bond won't be played by a white actor. Others will claim it's a guarantee he will be. Same with how famous the actors are, or their age, or if they'll be American.

    It's going to be a populist choice, someone people can easily see in the role like Brosnan in the 90's. Amazon realise how weary the fans are, they have to do something popular and not rock the boat, Just look at The Force Awakens.

    My wild guess it's probably be a Brosnan-like choice, or at least that's what Amazon will try to do. But we are no longer in the 90s and I don't think there's a candidate that can be plebiscited like Brosnan was at the time.

    But my main worry now is the script.

    I suppose the only actor who fits a Brosnan-like choice is Henry Cavill (mostly because he's aligned with the role from his past). But to be honest I think he might come with too many risks. Never say never though.
  • edited 4:33pm Posts: 6,755
    007HallY wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Coming back here after months, but do we think that everything that has been said about the next Bond by BB and MGW is out the window now? Specifically their age requirement?

    Perhaps. But honestly, I'm not sure there's some inevitable casting choice they'll make, even with this development. At the moment I think there's so many different interpretations of Amazon getting creative control and much of it is contradictory in regards to casting. Ask one person and they'd say it's a guarantee the next Bond won't be played by a white actor. Others will claim it's a guarantee he will be. Same with how famous the actors are, or their age, or if they'll be American.

    It's going to be a populist choice, someone people can easily see in the role like Brosnan in the 90's. Amazon realise how weary the fans are, they have to do something popular and not rock the boat, Just look at The Force Awakens.

    My wild guess it's probably be a Brosnan-like choice, or at least that's what Amazon will try to do. But we are no longer in the 90s and I don't think there's a candidate that can be plebiscited like Brosnan was at the time.

    But my main worry now is the script.

    I suppose the only actor who fits a Brosnan-like choice is Henry Cavill (mostly because he's aligned with the role from his past). But to be honest I think he might come with too many risks. Never say never though.

    I think that people think Cavill is still the same Cavill from Uncle, and that was 10 years ago. He’s older, and not in a flattering way, he’s too bulky, hair is getting thinner, face is puffier. And he still can’t act for the life of him. If a refrigerator could walk, that’d be him. Plenty of room for bullets, an henchman would say. Hard to miss.

    I wouldn’t be upset if he was cast. But I think he’s past his physical prime.
    Turner has aged well, Hoult is ageing well. Cavill has not, IMO.

    But, again, close enough to a Bond archetype, so I wouldn’t be upset.
  • Posts: 15,381
    007HallY wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Coming back here after months, but do we think that everything that has been said about the next Bond by BB and MGW is out the window now? Specifically their age requirement?

    Perhaps. But honestly, I'm not sure there's some inevitable casting choice they'll make, even with this development. At the moment I think there's so many different interpretations of Amazon getting creative control and much of it is contradictory in regards to casting. Ask one person and they'd say it's a guarantee the next Bond won't be played by a white actor. Others will claim it's a guarantee he will be. Same with how famous the actors are, or their age, or if they'll be American.

    It's going to be a populist choice, someone people can easily see in the role like Brosnan in the 90's. Amazon realise how weary the fans are, they have to do something popular and not rock the boat, Just look at The Force Awakens.

    My wild guess it's probably be a Brosnan-like choice, or at least that's what Amazon will try to do. But we are no longer in the 90s and I don't think there's a candidate that can be plebiscited like Brosnan was at the time.

    But my main worry now is the script.

    I suppose the only actor who fits a Brosnan-like choice is Henry Cavill (mostly because he's aligned with the role from his past). But to be honest I think he might come with too many risks. Never say never though.

    Cavill would have been my bet ten years ago or so. Before he proved to be, well, bland. There's something odd about his face too: too plastic looking. But I think he now stands a much better chance to be cast, ironically.

    On a side note, what's up with Jeff Bezos' tweet? Am I the only one to find this borderline amateurish. You don't cast a role, iconic or not, like you choose someone for X Factor. I know it was just in jest, but that's not professional all the same.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,102
    Ludovico wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Coming back here after months, but do we think that everything that has been said about the next Bond by BB and MGW is out the window now? Specifically their age requirement?

    Perhaps. But honestly, I'm not sure there's some inevitable casting choice they'll make, even with this development. At the moment I think there's so many different interpretations of Amazon getting creative control and much of it is contradictory in regards to casting. Ask one person and they'd say it's a guarantee the next Bond won't be played by a white actor. Others will claim it's a guarantee he will be. Same with how famous the actors are, or their age, or if they'll be American.

    It's going to be a populist choice, someone people can easily see in the role like Brosnan in the 90's. Amazon realise how weary the fans are, they have to do something popular and not rock the boat, Just look at The Force Awakens.

    My wild guess it's probably be a Brosnan-like choice, or at least that's what Amazon will try to do. But we are no longer in the 90s and I don't think there's a candidate that can be plebiscited like Brosnan was at the time.

    But my main worry now is the script.

    I suppose the only actor who fits a Brosnan-like choice is Henry Cavill (mostly because he's aligned with the role from his past). But to be honest I think he might come with too many risks. Never say never though.

    Cavill would have been my bet ten years ago or so. Before he proved to be, well, bland. There's something odd about his face too: too plastic looking. But I think he now stands a much better chance to be cast, ironically.

    On a side note, what's up with Jeff Bezos' tweet? Am I the only one to find this borderline amateurish. You don't cast a role, iconic or not, like you choose someone for X Factor. I know it was just in jest, but that's not professional all the same.

    I do kind of wonder what fan engagement looks like from here on in. It'll be a new team, so will it be more or less? Or will we get a sort of James Gunn-style online producer, posting updates to their socials? Personally I thought Eon got it about right, but I guess everything's different from here on.
  • Posts: 6,755
    mtm wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Coming back here after months, but do we think that everything that has been said about the next Bond by BB and MGW is out the window now? Specifically their age requirement?

    Perhaps. But honestly, I'm not sure there's some inevitable casting choice they'll make, even with this development. At the moment I think there's so many different interpretations of Amazon getting creative control and much of it is contradictory in regards to casting. Ask one person and they'd say it's a guarantee the next Bond won't be played by a white actor. Others will claim it's a guarantee he will be. Same with how famous the actors are, or their age, or if they'll be American.

    It's going to be a populist choice, someone people can easily see in the role like Brosnan in the 90's. Amazon realise how weary the fans are, they have to do something popular and not rock the boat, Just look at The Force Awakens.

    My wild guess it's probably be a Brosnan-like choice, or at least that's what Amazon will try to do. But we are no longer in the 90s and I don't think there's a candidate that can be plebiscited like Brosnan was at the time.

    But my main worry now is the script.

    I suppose the only actor who fits a Brosnan-like choice is Henry Cavill (mostly because he's aligned with the role from his past). But to be honest I think he might come with too many risks. Never say never though.

    Cavill would have been my bet ten years ago or so. Before he proved to be, well, bland. There's something odd about his face too: too plastic looking. But I think he now stands a much better chance to be cast, ironically.

    On a side note, what's up with Jeff Bezos' tweet? Am I the only one to find this borderline amateurish. You don't cast a role, iconic or not, like you choose someone for X Factor. I know it was just in jest, but that's not professional all the same.

    I do kind of wonder what fan engagement looks like from here on in. It'll be a new team, so will it be more or less? Or will we get a sort of James Gunn-style online producer, posting updates to their socials? Personally I thought Eon got it about right, but I guess everything's different from here on.

    Good points. Blast, now I'll have to join social media :(
  • Posts: 15
    Would anyone want to be Bond? It's 24/7 non-stop and super demanding.
  • Posts: 6,755
    dewiparry wrote: »
    Would anyone want to be Bond? It's 24/7 non-stop and super demanding.

    And to be the guy who came after Daniel Craig, and the first Bond after EON? He'll have to be brave, or mad, or a bit of both.
  • Posts: 15
    Univex wrote: »
    dewiparry wrote: »
    Would anyone want to be Bond? It's 24/7 non-stop and super demanding.

    And to be the guy who came after Daniel Craig, and the first Bond after EON? He'll have to be brave, or mad, or a bit of both.

    It's like pulling the shortest straw. We need an innovator
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,656
    I definitely agree that Aidan Turner is aging well. He looks more suited to play Bond now than he did 7 or 8 years ago.
  • edited 6:53pm Posts: 448
    zebrafish wrote: »
    Hoult is the better actor than Turner, I would be happy with him becoming Bond.

    No suprise perhaps, but I find the opposite to be true. Hoult does nothing for me, he's never convincing to me. His appearance does nothing for me either, a strange face, like a toddler who never grew up.

    Yeah I find him lacking any masculine vibe on screen. However... if he is a good or great, menacing Lex Luthor in the forthcoming Superman reboot I'll gladly reassess his potential. Playing the villain in one of the biggest films of 2025 is going to skyrocket his profile so that may convince Amazon to consider him. He's been around for a while so it's not as if he's an unknown, of course. 😉

    I watched him in Juror 2, Clint Eastwood's final directed film. He was pretty good in the film but I got zero "he should be considered for Bond!" vibe. But you never know, I guess.
  • DaltonforyouDaltonforyou The Daltonator
    Posts: 582
    bondywondy wrote: »
    zebrafish wrote: »
    Hoult is the better actor than Turner, I would be happy with him becoming Bond.

    No suprise perhaps, but I find the opposite to be true. Hoult does nothing for me, he's never convincing to me. His appearance does nothing for me either, a strange face, like a toddler who never grew up.

    Yeah i find him totally lacking any masculine vibe on screen. However... if he is a good or great, menacing Lex Luthor in the forthcoming Superman reboot, I'll gladly reassess his potential.

    Hoult is way too quiet and mild-mannered of an actor to play Bond imo.
  • buddyoldchapbuddyoldchap Formerly known as JeremyBondon
    Posts: 246
    I definitely agree that Aidan Turner is aging well. He looks more suited to play Bond now than he did 7 or 8 years ago.

    Agree, the man aged like a high end wine.

    @bondywondy @Daltonforyou
    Concurred on all counts
  • Posts: 448
    Univex wrote: »
    dewiparry wrote: »
    Would anyone want to be Bond? It's 24/7 non-stop and super demanding.

    And to be the guy who came after Daniel Craig, and the first Bond after EON? He'll have to be brave, or mad, or a bit of both.

    Well the money is pretty good! That's a good reason to want the role don'tcha ya think?

    money-money-money-make-it-rain.gif

    ;))
Sign In or Register to comment.