› ›

Who should/could be a Bond actor?

1…421422424426427…1235

Comments

  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited September 2018 Posts: 8,453
    Don't know if it has been mentioned already, but Henry Cavill will now be starring in The Witch series for Netflix.
  • TorgeirtrapTorgeirtrap
    Posts: 17,821
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    Don't know if it has been mentioned already, but Henry Cavill will now be starring in The Witch series for Netflix.

    Think someone mentioned it on a different thread. Netflix shows get a lot of attention these days, so it could be a smart move for him to sign on a project like this.
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    RichardTheBruce wrote: »

    You see I reacted to Max here. I don't think Hardy is a possibility for Bond--his FURY ROAD experience showed him to be a moody, difficult actor who didn't understand the director's vision. The producers surely know that history.

    That's what we have now. The producers seem fine with it.

    They also had that with Connery and he was the best Bond of them all. I have no issue with Hardy other than he is far too short to be Bond. At 5ft 8in he’s a midget for the role.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,453
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    RichardTheBruce wrote: »

    You see I reacted to Max here. I don't think Hardy is a possibility for Bond--his FURY ROAD experience showed him to be a moody, difficult actor who didn't understand the director's vision. The producers surely know that history.

    That's what we have now. The producers seem fine with it.

    They also had that with Connery and he was the best Bond of them all. I have no issue with Hardy other than he is far too short to be Bond. At 5ft 8in he’s a midget for the role.

    Did he look like a midget as Bane?
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    The standards have obviously slipped on the height front of late, to my disappointment. I'd rather they not have to continue resorting to camera tricks, angles and shorter co-stars in order to accommodate a lead. So Hardy would be a bit low down on my list of replacements. Plus he just reminds me too much of Craig in the physique department.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,252
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    RichardTheBruce wrote: »

    You see I reacted to Max here. I don't think Hardy is a possibility for Bond--his FURY ROAD experience showed him to be a moody, difficult actor who didn't understand the director's vision. The producers surely know that history.

    That's what we have now. The producers seem fine with it.

    They also had that with Connery and he was the best Bond of them all. I have no issue with Hardy other than he is far too short to be Bond. At 5ft 8in he’s a midget for the role.

    Did he look like a midget as Bane?

    It's funny you ask, yes he did appear too small as Bane. He may have beefed up and wore shoes with built up soles but when onscreen with Bale he was not as imposing as he should have been.
  • TorgeirtrapTorgeirtrap
    Posts: 17,821
    Taking up a comment by @boldfinger on the Coming soon to cinemas near you! thread:
    boldfinger wrote: »
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    Could Rupert Friend make a good future villain?
    I´m a bit surprised he isn´t mentioned more often as potential future Bond. I think he looks very different depending on the camera angle (haven´t seen him in any film yet), but on some fotos he cartainly looks much more fitting for Bond than any of the others mentioned lately.

    homeland_404_0079-cr.jpg?w=1038&h=576&crop=1

    Discuss!
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    Taking up a comment by @boldfinger on the Coming soon to cinemas near you! thread:
    boldfinger wrote: »
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    Could Rupert Friend make a good future villain?
    I´m a bit surprised he isn´t mentioned more often as potential future Bond. I think he looks very different depending on the camera angle (haven´t seen him in any film yet), but on some fotos he cartainly looks much more fitting for Bond than any of the others mentioned lately.

    homeland_404_0079-cr.jpg?w=1038&h=576&crop=1

    Discuss!
    He's been mentioned before a few years back. There was a member (who no longer posts here) who was particularly in favour of him. He's a good actor and can be credible. My issue is whether he projects sufficient likability on screen to be a box office draw globally, and particularly with the fairer sex. I don't know the answer to that question, but it's an important one given the popularity of these films these days.
  • TorgeirtrapTorgeirtrap
    edited September 2018 Posts: 17,821
    bondjames wrote: »
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    Taking up a comment by @boldfinger on the Coming soon to cinemas near you! thread:
    boldfinger wrote: »
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    Could Rupert Friend make a good future villain?
    I´m a bit surprised he isn´t mentioned more often as potential future Bond. I think he looks very different depending on the camera angle (haven´t seen him in any film yet), but on some fotos he cartainly looks much more fitting for Bond than any of the others mentioned lately.

    homeland_404_0079-cr.jpg?w=1038&h=576&crop=1

    Discuss!
    He's been mentioned before a few years back. There was a member (who no longer posts here) who was particularly in favour of him. He's a good actor and can be credible. My issue is whether he projects sufficient likability on screen to be a box office draw globally, and particularly with the fairer sex. I don't know the answer to that question, but it's an important one given the popularity of these films these days.

    Indeed. I could see him in a Dalton category of sorts; the more intense Bond.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    Taking up a comment by @boldfinger on the Coming soon to cinemas near you! thread:
    boldfinger wrote: »
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    Could Rupert Friend make a good future villain?
    I´m a bit surprised he isn´t mentioned more often as potential future Bond. I think he looks very different depending on the camera angle (haven´t seen him in any film yet), but on some fotos he cartainly looks much more fitting for Bond than any of the others mentioned lately.

    homeland_404_0079-cr.jpg?w=1038&h=576&crop=1

    Discuss!
    He's been mentioned before a few years back. There was a member (who no longer posts here) who was particularly in favour of him. He's a good actor and can be credible. My issue is whether he projects sufficient likability on screen to be a box office draw globally, and particularly with the fairer sex. I don't know the answer to that question, but it's an important one given the popularity of these films these days.

    Indeed. I could see him in a Dalton category of sorts; the more intense Bond.
    Yes. Coincidentally, the member who liked him went by the username of dalton.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,011
    If he played the role well, I wouldn't mind him as Bond - he's the right age currently (36) and when he seems engaged and interested enough in the project, he can act (stuff like Hitman is a different story entirely).

    Sure, I could go for it - better than other names mentioned over the years, that's for sure.
  • TorgeirtrapTorgeirtrap
    Posts: 17,821
    bondjames wrote: »
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    Taking up a comment by @boldfinger on the Coming soon to cinemas near you! thread:
    boldfinger wrote: »
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    Could Rupert Friend make a good future villain?
    I´m a bit surprised he isn´t mentioned more often as potential future Bond. I think he looks very different depending on the camera angle (haven´t seen him in any film yet), but on some fotos he cartainly looks much more fitting for Bond than any of the others mentioned lately.

    homeland_404_0079-cr.jpg?w=1038&h=576&crop=1

    Discuss!
    He's been mentioned before a few years back. There was a member (who no longer posts here) who was particularly in favour of him. He's a good actor and can be credible. My issue is whether he projects sufficient likability on screen to be a box office draw globally, and particularly with the fairer sex. I don't know the answer to that question, but it's an important one given the popularity of these films these days.

    Indeed. I could see him in a Dalton category of sorts; the more intense Bond.
    Yes. Coincidentally, the member who liked him went by the username of dalton.

    No wonder he suggested him then! ;-)
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    If he played the role well, I wouldn't mind him as Bond - he's the right age currently (36) and when he seems engaged and interested enough in the project, he can act (stuff like Hitman is a different story entirely).

    Sure, I could go for it - better than other names mentioned over the years, that's for sure.

    I stopped watching Homeland after four seasons, but it sure wasn't because of Peter Quinn, the character he played. Friend was one of the highlights of that TV series for me.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,011
    @Torgeirtrap, I burned through Homeland several months back and Quinn is one of my favorite characters for sure - if there's something to sell someone on him playing Bond, that role would work.
  • LudovicoLudovico
    Posts: 15,231
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    RichardTheBruce wrote: »

    You see I reacted to Max here. I don't think Hardy is a possibility for Bond--his FURY ROAD experience showed him to be a moody, difficult actor who didn't understand the director's vision. The producers surely know that history.

    That's what we have now. The producers seem fine with it.

    They also had that with Connery and he was the best Bond of them all. I have no issue with Hardy other than he is far too short to be Bond. At 5ft 8in he’s a midget for the role.

    Beside Craig's prima dona attitude is grossly exaggerated if not downright fabricated.
  • TorgeirtrapTorgeirtrap
    Posts: 17,821
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    @Torgeirtrap, I burned through Homeland several months back and Quinn is one of my favorite characters for sure - if there's something to sell someone on him playing Bond, that role would work.

    Indeed! I think he had some really nice fight/suspense (in lack of a better word) scenes in Homeland, so he could no doubt manage that aspect of the role easily.
  • mattjoesmattjoes Pay more attention to your chef
    Posts: 7,057
    I don't want Tom Hardy for the next Bond. He's a pussycat. I want someone who truly, truly conveys the fact Bond is a hard-edged killer, someone who can display Bond's inner emotional turmoil over the deaths of the women he loved, and over his working in a profession in which he might not live to see the next day; a nervewracking profession which induces him to drink and pop pills. I think I know just the guy...

    latest?cb=20120408220832
  • TorgeirtrapTorgeirtrap
    Posts: 17,821
    Danny Trejo is Machete Bond…James Bond!
  • JeremyBondonJeremyBondon Seeking out odd jobs with Oddjob @Tangier
    Posts: 1,318
    I wish we could clone Connery and be done with it forever, and ever and...ever o-THE-SHINING-facebook.jpg
  • TorgeirtrapTorgeirtrap
    Posts: 17,821
    JeremyBondon wrote: »
    I wish we could clone Connery and be done with it forever, and ever and...ever

    …Add Lazenby's fighting, Moore's smooth delivery of any punchline and Dalton's intensity, and we have the perfect Bond!
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 13,926
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    RichardTheBruce wrote: »

    You see I reacted to Max here. I don't think Hardy is a possibility for Bond--his FURY ROAD experience showed him to be a moody, difficult actor who didn't understand the director's vision. The producers surely know that history.

    That's what we have now. The producers seem fine with it.
    Funny. But that doesn't show an understanding of what I said. Or a sense of reality.

  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,511
    Ludovico wrote: »
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    RichardTheBruce wrote: »

    You see I reacted to Max here. I don't think Hardy is a possibility for Bond--his FURY ROAD experience showed him to be a moody, difficult actor who didn't understand the director's vision. The producers surely know that history.

    That's what we have now. The producers seem fine with it.

    They also had that with Connery and he was the best Bond of them all. I have no issue with Hardy other than he is far too short to be Bond. At 5ft 8in he’s a midget for the role.

    Beside Craig's prima dona attitude is grossly exaggerated if not downright fabricated.

    you're correct.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,252
    peter wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    RichardTheBruce wrote: »

    You see I reacted to Max here. I don't think Hardy is a possibility for Bond--his FURY ROAD experience showed him to be a moody, difficult actor who didn't understand the director's vision. The producers surely know that history.

    That's what we have now. The producers seem fine with it.

    They also had that with Connery and he was the best Bond of them all. I have no issue with Hardy other than he is far too short to be Bond. At 5ft 8in he’s a midget for the role.

    Beside Craig's prima dona attitude is grossly exaggerated if not downright fabricated.

    you're correct.

    +1

  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,511
    RichardTheBruce wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    RichardTheBruce wrote: »

    You see I reacted to Max here. I don't think Hardy is a possibility for Bond--his FURY ROAD experience showed him to be a moody, difficult actor who didn't understand the director's vision. The producers surely know that history.

    That's what we have now. The producers seem fine with it.
    Funny. But that doesn't show an understanding of what I said. Or a sense of reality.

    Stick a knife into the incumbent, and others laughing as if this is comic gold instead of what it is: ridiculously precitable.

  • mattjoesmattjoes Pay more attention to your chef
    Posts: 7,057
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    Danny Trejo is Machete Bond…James Bond!

    God has mercy... Bond doesn't!
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    My biggest concern about Hardy is his tattoos .

    Would they airbrush over those in every scene he wears a short sleeved shirt,t-shirt or is topless ?

    2689399.main_image.jpg?strip=all&w=1200&h=800&crop=1
  • GetafixGetafix
    Posts: 11,425
    Hardy is too old. He's 41 this year. He will never be Bond
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,359
    barryt007 wrote: »
    2689399.main_image.jpg?strip=all&w=1200&h=800&crop=1

    ON-CH892_Thumbs_B620_20171024161012.jpg
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Murdock wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    2689399.main_image.jpg?strip=all&w=1200&h=800&crop=1
    ON-CH892_Thumbs_B620_20171024161012.jpg
    I know, right? :))

    I don't understand what people see in Hardy that's so worthy of Bond.
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    I'm neutral about him,just curious how they would handle the tattoo situation.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Hire the best CGI artists who gave us the parachute-surfing tsunami scene.
Sign In or Register to comment.