Who should/could be a Bond actor?

14754764784804811235

Comments

  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Benny wrote: »
    Where do they come up with this stuff?

    https://www.mirror.co.uk/film/new-james-bond-odds-place-13799839

    Hiddleston front runner.

    James Norton second.

    Guessing it's just the usual clickbait.
    No, this data is actually coming from the big betting houses. They adjust the odds based on how the punters are making their bets. Sometimes you can see big changes in the odds if a big bet is placed in one direction, so that the house still makes money. It moves around a bit, but the big names generally are always on there. Madden has seen the biggest fall lately (he was top for some time). Hiddleston has come back into the frame since he announced his theatre run for this year and after Bob Iger dropped his name for the Loki Disney + streaming show. He was very low profile throughout all of 2018.
    Benny wrote: »
    I'd be willing to give Tom Hughes a chance. He's 33, 6'1", decent actor with a growing resume of semi popular tv roles.
    Certainly one to keep in consideration.
    Turner has grown on me. Amazingly. However he is a good actor and has the right look.
    I'd also be happy with Tom Hiddleston, and think he could play a decent Bond.
    Even Henry Cavill may have the right mix and could potentially be a decent 007.
    Add to that any decent unknown who hasn't been mentioned, and isn't on the radar.
    However, I'd like to return to a more 'traditional' Bond with the next actor. The closer to Fleming the better. I think Dalton got the closest to a Fleming Bond, but Connery will always be the benchmark that other Bond actors will be measured against.
    I'm not in favour of Hughes, but would be ok with Fassbender (I realize he's older, but he'd be perfect), Hiddleston (second choice), Cavill (third, despite his acting limitations), or Turner.

    I like Hemsworth but don't see him as Bond.

    I agree on an important need for a more Bondian look asap.
  • mattjoesmattjoes Pay more attention to your chef
    edited January 2019 Posts: 7,058
    Ludovico wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    Risico007 wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    Now come on....

    If you can’t see the raw magnetism of Barry Nelson and Disney’s ability to bring actors back from the dead as a great way to bring the series forward I don’t jbow what to tell you

    I'll take a CGI revived version of Barry Nelson over any of the Bond potentials that have been thrown at us since SP.............and I loathe CGI.

    I have warmed to the idea of Turner or Cavill, though.
    I still maintain the opinion that we shouldn't be looking at Craig's replacement just yet. We should be looking at suave, attractive couples who could feasibly conceive the next Bond actor. By the time the child is born, grows into adulthood and reaches his mid to late 30's, that's how long it should take for Eon to begin planning the next Bond film.

    At this rate and given the quality of the various candidates, this might be the safest option: breed the next James Bond actor.

    I know just the man to oversee his creation.

    220px-Hugo_Drax_1.jpg
  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    Posts: 5,185
    mattjoes wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    Risico007 wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    Now come on....

    If you can’t see the raw magnetism of Barry Nelson and Disney’s ability to bring actors back from the dead as a great way to bring the series forward I don’t jbow what to tell you

    I'll take a CGI revived version of Barry Nelson over any of the Bond potentials that have been thrown at us since SP.............and I loathe CGI.

    I have warmed to the idea of Turner or Cavill, though.
    I still maintain the opinion that we shouldn't be looking at Craig's replacement just yet. We should be looking at suave, attractive couples who could feasibly conceive the next Bond actor. By the time the child is born, grows into adulthood and reaches his mid to late 30's, that's how long it should take for Eon to begin planning the next Bond film.

    At this rate and given the quality of the various candidates, this might be the safest option: breed the next James Bond actor.

    I know just the man to oversee his creation.

    220px-Hugo_Drax_1.jpg

    Good choice, he's certainly more capable than Dr. Mortner. But he might blow the Budget on fancy space stations.
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,585
    00Agent wrote: »
    mattjoes wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    Risico007 wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    Now come on....

    If you can’t see the raw magnetism of Barry Nelson and Disney’s ability to bring actors back from the dead as a great way to bring the series forward I don’t jbow what to tell you

    I'll take a CGI revived version of Barry Nelson over any of the Bond potentials that have been thrown at us since SP.............and I loathe CGI.

    I have warmed to the idea of Turner or Cavill, though.
    I still maintain the opinion that we shouldn't be looking at Craig's replacement just yet. We should be looking at suave, attractive couples who could feasibly conceive the next Bond actor. By the time the child is born, grows into adulthood and reaches his mid to late 30's, that's how long it should take for Eon to begin planning the next Bond film.

    At this rate and given the quality of the various candidates, this might be the safest option: breed the next James Bond actor.

    I know just the man to oversee his creation.

    220px-Hugo_Drax_1.jpg

    Good choice, he's certainly more capable than Dr. Mortner. But he might blow the Budget on fancy space stations.

    That's true. He would create the ideal for sure, but he's erratic by nature so it's hard to fully trust him.

    And his current location is listed as 'floating amongst the stars'.
  • Posts: 16,226
    Benny wrote: »
    What makes you think that there will be a lengthy delay after Bond 25 @ToTheRight ?

    It's become so common now. They take so long just to get another film out with Craig. Also if Craig does depart after this next one, I imagine there will be an even longer process in deciding the tone and style of future outings. In addition, Barbara and Michael haven't been in much of a hurry to get the films out on a regular basis in more than a decade.


    On a more optimistic note, perhaps B25 will be such an enormous success for Universal to motivate Eon to move quicker and get B26 out within a few years. Perhaps Universal/MGM can hire writer to work on future scripts while a new film is in production? Plan ahead as it were. I'm hoping Eon ceases this practice of concentrating on one film at a time, taking a long break and eventually getting around to another.
  • Posts: 15,233
    mattjoes wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    Risico007 wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    Now come on....

    If you can’t see the raw magnetism of Barry Nelson and Disney’s ability to bring actors back from the dead as a great way to bring the series forward I don’t jbow what to tell you

    I'll take a CGI revived version of Barry Nelson over any of the Bond potentials that have been thrown at us since SP.............and I loathe CGI.

    I have warmed to the idea of Turner or Cavill, though.
    I still maintain the opinion that we shouldn't be looking at Craig's replacement just yet. We should be looking at suave, attractive couples who could feasibly conceive the next Bond actor. By the time the child is born, grows into adulthood and reaches his mid to late 30's, that's how long it should take for Eon to begin planning the next Bond film.

    At this rate and given the quality of the various candidates, this might be the safest option: breed the next James Bond actor.

    I know just the man to oversee his creation.

    220px-Hugo_Drax_1.jpg

    Point of contention for some : we'd have another blond Bond.

    Positive point: he'd make a Bond that is tall enough.

    Indirect question: who would "breed" the best Bond actor?
  • Posts: 17,821
    Benny wrote: »
    I'd be willing to give Tom Hughes a chance. He's 33, 6'1", decent actor with a growing resume of semi popular tv roles.
    Certainly one to keep in consideration.

    Tom Hughes could be a left field choice. Very different looking to Craig, but the right height (very important, IMO), and an OK voice. I liked his performance in The Game.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Benny wrote: »
    I'd be willing to give Tom Hughes a chance. He's 33, 6'1", decent actor with a growing resume of semi popular tv roles.
    Certainly one to keep in consideration.

    Tom Hughes could be a left field choice. Very different looking to Craig, but the right height (very important, IMO), and an OK voice. I liked his performance in The Game.
    @Torgertrap, do you think he has charisma? I agree on his look being ok, but the guy doesn't hold the screen for me. He seems a bit ordinary.
  • edited January 2019 Posts: 17,821
    bondjames wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    I'd be willing to give Tom Hughes a chance. He's 33, 6'1", decent actor with a growing resume of semi popular tv roles.
    Certainly one to keep in consideration.

    Tom Hughes could be a left field choice. Very different looking to Craig, but the right height (very important, IMO), and an OK voice. I liked his performance in The Game.
    @Torgertrap, do you think he has charisma? I agree on his look being ok, but the guy doesn't hold the screen for me. He seems a bit ordinary.

    I would preferably see him in more roles before being sure; the roles I've seen in him, are rather cold characters (one of them a murderer). As far as those roles go, I think he's been good.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    bondjames wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    I'd be willing to give Tom Hughes a chance. He's 33, 6'1", decent actor with a growing resume of semi popular tv roles.
    Certainly one to keep in consideration.

    Tom Hughes could be a left field choice. Very different looking to Craig, but the right height (very important, IMO), and an OK voice. I liked his performance in The Game.
    @Torgertrap, do you think he has charisma? I agree on his look being ok, but the guy doesn't hold the screen for me. He seems a bit ordinary.

    I would preferably see him in more roles before being sure; the roles I've seen in him, are rather cold characters (one of them a murderer). As far as those roles go, I think he's been good.
    I must seek out more of his work. I've seen his name mentioned previously, but to me he seems like Madden; tv material at best.

    I think all the others we discuss here, irrespective of acting abilities, at least have some star power.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Ludovico wrote: »
    mattjoes wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    Risico007 wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    Now come on....

    If you can’t see the raw magnetism of Barry Nelson and Disney’s ability to bring actors back from the dead as a great way to bring the series forward I don’t jbow what to tell you

    I'll take a CGI revived version of Barry Nelson over any of the Bond potentials that have been thrown at us since SP.............and I loathe CGI.

    I have warmed to the idea of Turner or Cavill, though.
    I still maintain the opinion that we shouldn't be looking at Craig's replacement just yet. We should be looking at suave, attractive couples who could feasibly conceive the next Bond actor. By the time the child is born, grows into adulthood and reaches his mid to late 30's, that's how long it should take for Eon to begin planning the next Bond film.

    At this rate and given the quality of the various candidates, this might be the safest option: breed the next James Bond actor.

    I know just the man to oversee his creation.

    220px-Hugo_Drax_1.jpg

    Point of contention for some : we'd have another blond Bond.

    As far as I remember there were people of various races in Drax s selection of perfect specimens.
  • edited January 2019 Posts: 17,821
    bondjames wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    I'd be willing to give Tom Hughes a chance. He's 33, 6'1", decent actor with a growing resume of semi popular tv roles.
    Certainly one to keep in consideration.

    Tom Hughes could be a left field choice. Very different looking to Craig, but the right height (very important, IMO), and an OK voice. I liked his performance in The Game.
    @Torgertrap, do you think he has charisma? I agree on his look being ok, but the guy doesn't hold the screen for me. He seems a bit ordinary.

    I would preferably see him in more roles before being sure; the roles I've seen in him, are rather cold characters (one of them a murderer). As far as those roles go, I think he's been good.
    I must seek out more of his work. I've seen his name mentioned previously, but to me he seems like Madden; tv material at best.

    I think all the others we discuss here, irrespective of acting abilities, at least have some star power.

    If you haven't seen it, The Game is a good place to start. Very Le Carré. And by "very" I mean VERY. He's not playing a Bond like character at all though, but it's a spy drama. There's a Bond connection too, as Paul Ritter (QoS) plays one of the main characters - and Rachael Stirling (daughter of Diana Rigg!) also features.

    Hughes would be an unexpected choice though, snd I wouldn't put my money on that ever happening.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    bondjames wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    I'd be willing to give Tom Hughes a chance. He's 33, 6'1", decent actor with a growing resume of semi popular tv roles.
    Certainly one to keep in consideration.

    Tom Hughes could be a left field choice. Very different looking to Craig, but the right height (very important, IMO), and an OK voice. I liked his performance in The Game.
    @Torgertrap, do you think he has charisma? I agree on his look being ok, but the guy doesn't hold the screen for me. He seems a bit ordinary.

    I would preferably see him in more roles before being sure; the roles I've seen in him, are rather cold characters (one of them a murderer). As far as those roles go, I think he's been good.
    I must seek out more of his work. I've seen his name mentioned previously, but to me he seems like Madden; tv material at best.

    I think all the others we discuss here, irrespective of acting abilities, at least have some star power.

    If you haven't seen it, The Game is a good place to start. Very Le Carré. And by "very" I mean VERY. He's not playing a Bond like character at all though, but it's a spy drama. There's a Bond connection too, as Paul Ritter (QoS) plays one of the main characters - and Rachael Stirling (daughter of Diana Rigg!) also features.

    Hughes would be an unexpected choice though, snd I wouldn't put my money on that ever happening.
    I've seen The Game. That's the only thing of his that I have seen. It was a good show, but I didn't get any sense of 'special' from Hughes in it. I suppose he's just not my cup of tea. As mentioned, for me it's a charisma thing with him.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,454
    It's interesting to note that Brosnan was known for a hugely popular series which ran for 5 seasons until he became Bond. And now Aidan Turner's hugely popular show Poldark will apparently end after its fifth season airs in 2019.

    If they are looking for someone to take Bond back to the icon he was once known as, I think they could take inspiration with how they pulled this off before. It was needed after the dour Dalton duo, and it's certainly needed now. We need someone who can deliver on charisma and endear an audience without being an open book. I believe Turner suits perfectly for the modern era.

    aidan-turner-photos-08.jpg?w=480&h=583
  • Posts: 6,710
    So, even though we don't all agree on an actor, Turner is getting quite the backup from the bond fan crowd. Right?

    It's like if Barbara met with him to secure him knowing that the Poldark series was close to an end. A bit like her father did with Pierce and Remington Steele. In fact, that's a really close comparison right there, isn't it? Both Irish, both finalising shows on tv. Turner reportedly had early talks with EON. Not too far fetched to think the same scenario is upon us. I wouldn't complain. I'd be happy for it.
  • JeremyBondonJeremyBondon Seeking out odd jobs with Oddjob @Tangier
    Posts: 1,318
    Univex wrote: »
    So, even though we don't all agree on an actor, Turner is getting quite the backup from the bond fan crowd. Right?

    It's like if Barbara met with him to secure him knowing that the Poldark series was close to an end. A bit like her father did with Pierce and Remington Steele. In fact, that's a really close comparison right there, isn't it? Both Irish, both finalising shows on tv. Turner reportedly had early talks with EON. Not too far fetched to think the same scenario is upon us. I wouldn't complain. I'd be happy for it.

    Interesting post there @Univex. Let's go deep conspiracy for a little bit. Craig has stated multiple times he's in fact quite done with playing Bond. Turner on the other hand has been bound arms and legs to Poldark, season after season, given the success. Let's think for a bit Turner already landed the job (he met with Barb) but made a deal that he'd do the 5th Poldark season, Craig was begged to do a proper send off ($$$ too) and Turner could slide into the Bond glove comfortably after Craig's departure. Tying it all nicely together.

    Turner is that one off precious Bond potential gem, like the previous Bonds (in their own way) once were. Barbara, if she truly has the eye, must have noticed this too. We can only hope.
  • Posts: 15,233
    Ludovico wrote: »
    mattjoes wrote: »
    Ludovico wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    Risico007 wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    Now come on....

    If you can’t see the raw magnetism of Barry Nelson and Disney’s ability to bring actors back from the dead as a great way to bring the series forward I don’t jbow what to tell you

    I'll take a CGI revived version of Barry Nelson over any of the Bond potentials that have been thrown at us since SP.............and I loathe CGI.

    I have warmed to the idea of Turner or Cavill, though.
    I still maintain the opinion that we shouldn't be looking at Craig's replacement just yet. We should be looking at suave, attractive couples who could feasibly conceive the next Bond actor. By the time the child is born, grows into adulthood and reaches his mid to late 30's, that's how long it should take for Eon to begin planning the next Bond film.

    At this rate and given the quality of the various candidates, this might be the safest option: breed the next James Bond actor.

    I know just the man to oversee his creation.

    220px-Hugo_Drax_1.jpg

    Point of contention for some : we'd have another blond Bond.

    As far as I remember there were people of various races in Drax s selection of perfect specimens.

    I think so too, but haven't seen the movie in ages.
  • Posts: 17,821
    bondjames wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    I'd be willing to give Tom Hughes a chance. He's 33, 6'1", decent actor with a growing resume of semi popular tv roles.
    Certainly one to keep in consideration.

    Tom Hughes could be a left field choice. Very different looking to Craig, but the right height (very important, IMO), and an OK voice. I liked his performance in The Game.
    @Torgertrap, do you think he has charisma? I agree on his look being ok, but the guy doesn't hold the screen for me. He seems a bit ordinary.

    I would preferably see him in more roles before being sure; the roles I've seen in him, are rather cold characters (one of them a murderer). As far as those roles go, I think he's been good.
    I must seek out more of his work. I've seen his name mentioned previously, but to me he seems like Madden; tv material at best.

    I think all the others we discuss here, irrespective of acting abilities, at least have some star power.

    If you haven't seen it, The Game is a good place to start. Very Le Carré. And by "very" I mean VERY. He's not playing a Bond like character at all though, but it's a spy drama. There's a Bond connection too, as Paul Ritter (QoS) plays one of the main characters - and Rachael Stirling (daughter of Diana Rigg!) also features.

    Hughes would be an unexpected choice though, snd I wouldn't put my money on that ever happening.
    I've seen The Game. That's the only thing of his that I have seen. It was a good show, but I didn't get any sense of 'special' from Hughes in it. I suppose he's just not my cup of tea. As mentioned, for me it's a charisma thing with him.

    As is the case for most names on this thread I guess. I think there's something interesting about Hughes, but that doesn't necessary make him a likely candidate for Bond. I wouldn't be negative to him getting cast, that's where I stand about him at least.

    Turner falls into the same category for me, although I could actually see him getting the part. Still think they missed an opportunity with Luke Evans, but now I'm only repeating my past comments.
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 13,933
    There really are a lot of possibilities at this point, before BOND 25 even exists.

    Here's one timestream.


    Daniel Craig: I will keep playing Bond as long as I can
    (30 Sep 2015)
    https://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/sep/30/daniel-craig-james-bond-film-role-spectre

    Daniel Craig pulls surprise U-turn over playing James Bond again: 'I would miss it terribly'.
    (10 October 2016)
    https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/daniel-craig-next-james-bond-who-will-replace-odds-aidan-turner-tom-hiddleston-idris-elba-james-a7353506.html

    Daniel Craig 'signs up to play James Bond in two new movies'
    (7 August 2017)
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/daniel-craig-reportedly-signs-play-bond-two-new-movies/

    James Bond 25: Daniel Craig WON’T quit after all? ‘He could come back again’
    JAMES BOND producer Barbara Broccoli is allegedly hopeful that Daniel Craig will be back for a sixth film after all.
    (2 Sep 2018)
    https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/1011985/James-Bond-25-Daniel-Craig-quit-stay-another-film-Danny-Boyle-Barbara-Broccoli


  • JeremyBondonJeremyBondon Seeking out odd jobs with Oddjob @Tangier
    Posts: 1,318
    There really are a lot of possibilities at this point, before BOND 25 even exists.

    Here's one timestream.


    Daniel Craig: I will keep playing Bond as long as I can
    (30 Sep 2015)
    https://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/sep/30/daniel-craig-james-bond-film-role-spectre

    Daniel Craig pulls surprise U-turn over playing James Bond again: 'I would miss it terribly'.
    (10 October 2016)
    https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/daniel-craig-next-james-bond-who-will-replace-odds-aidan-turner-tom-hiddleston-idris-elba-james-a7353506.html

    Daniel Craig 'signs up to play James Bond in two new movies'
    (7 August 2017)
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/daniel-craig-reportedly-signs-play-bond-two-new-movies/

    James Bond 25: Daniel Craig WON’T quit after all? ‘He could come back again’
    JAMES BOND producer Barbara Broccoli is allegedly hopeful that Daniel Craig will be back for a sixth film after all.
    (2 Sep 2018)
    https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/1011985/James-Bond-25-Daniel-Craig-quit-stay-another-film-Danny-Boyle-Barbara-Broccoli


    Honestly I'm tired of Craig as Bond and the style in general. CR is far and away his best film, that alone says enough. Bond needs be to reinvented in a classical manner, fresh blood and fresh inspiration.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Craig would probably be around 54 in a sixth.
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 13,933
    They could finish like they started. Pump out a quick one in two years as the sixth.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,454
    They could finish like they started. Pump out a quick one in two years as the sixth.

    Haha! I'll believe that when I see it. No way Daniel is involved without at least 3 years holiday.
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 13,933
    Depends on what they want and agree to. If they think that's the method to slip in one more mission, it's one way.

    Also for the next Bond, they could choose an actor planning on 2 or 3 films in a controlled way rather than trying for the long haul or to squeeze all the films they can out of an actor. The filmmakers have been confident on other fronts, could strike out in a new direction.
  • Posts: 6,710
    Univex wrote: »
    So, even though we don't all agree on an actor, Turner is getting quite the backup from the bond fan crowd. Right?

    It's like if Barbara met with him to secure him knowing that the Poldark series was close to an end. A bit like her father did with Pierce and Remington Steele. In fact, that's a really close comparison right there, isn't it? Both Irish, both finalising shows on tv. Turner reportedly had early talks with EON. Not too far fetched to think the same scenario is upon us. I wouldn't complain. I'd be happy for it.

    Interesting post there @Univex. Let's go deep conspiracy for a little bit. Craig has stated multiple times he's in fact quite done with playing Bond. Turner on the other hand has been bound arms and legs to Poldark, season after season, given the success. Let's think for a bit Turner already landed the job (he met with Barb) but made a deal that he'd do the 5th Poldark season, Craig was begged to do a proper send off ($$$ too) and Turner could slide into the Bond glove comfortably after Craig's departure. Tying it all nicely together.

    Turner is that one off precious Bond potential gem, like the previous Bonds (in their own way) once were. Barbara, if she truly has the eye, must have noticed this too. We can only hope.

    My thoughts exactly, @JeremyBondon. And let's hope that's the case. I'd be one happy fan.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Tom Brittney (28, 6ft 2) has been getting some time in the headlines recently as he is stepping in for the departing James Norton on Season 4 of Granchester. He had a small role in Babs's project Film Stars Don't Die in Liverpool. May be worth keeping an eye on.

    He has a bit of a younger Cavill look to him.
    sopxe5p.jpg
    2dIvqd7.jpg
    vplEIn2.jpg
  • edited January 2019 Posts: 17,821
    bondjames wrote: »
    Tom Brittney (28, 6ft 2) has been getting some time in the headlines recently as he is stepping in for the departing James Norton on Season 4 of Granchester. He had a small role in Babs's project Film Stars Don't Die in Liverpool. May be worth keeping an eye on.

    He has a bit of a younger Cavill look to him.
    sopxe5p.jpg
    2dIvqd7.jpg
    vplEIn2.jpg

    Interesting, he certainly looks like he could be Cavill's younger brother based on those pictures! I usually watch Granchester, so I'll definitely tune in to see how he does in that role. He doesn't have Norton's soft voice either, which is a good thing re. Bond.

  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    bondjames wrote: »
    Tom Brittney (28, 6ft 2) has been getting some time in the headlines recently as he is stepping in for the departing James Norton on Season 4 of Granchester. He had a small role in Babs's project Film Stars Don't Die in Liverpool. May be worth keeping an eye on.

    He has a bit of a younger Cavill look to him.
    sopxe5p.jpg
    2dIvqd7.jpg
    vplEIn2.jpg

    Interesting, he certainly looks like he could be Cavill's younger brother based on those pictures! I usually watch Granchester, so I'll definitely tune in to see how he does in that role. He doesn't have Norton's soft voice either, which is a good thing re. Bond.

    Good point about the voice. Norton has never impressed me as a candidate, and not just because of that - I find him flat as an actor. Brittney sounds ok in that department.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Looks like a mix of Henry Cavill and Richard Madden.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,511
    Looks like a mix of Henry Cavill and Richard Madden.

    actually-- you're bang-on.
Sign In or Register to comment.