It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
It doesn't get more official than this.
I'll put it in simple english one last time: give me an official press release from EON that does not re-use Craig's statement on the Stephen Colbert interview. In other words, that link you've posted twice is not good enough, so find another press release as proof.
I said: give me an official press release from EON that does not re-use Craig's statement on the Stephen Colbert interview.
Your new link still only re-use the Craig statement.
'The actor confirmed he would play James Bond for the fifth time to host Stephen Colbert on The Late Show last night.
I want a link to an official press release without that statement from Craig.
That may be more painful for him than the CASINO ROYALE torture. I think he can take it, though.
Just answer the question: Give me a statement that does not re-use that statement from Craig. And if you haven't understood yet that I am not disputing the fact that Craig is returning and I'm only being an annoying pedantic person like you are, then quit with calling me a 'son', because you are the only one who seems too brain dead to understand the point of the debate.
Once they have a distributor and an affirmed director and writer then we will probably get a larger and more comprehensive announcement, rather than the piecemeal (and already partially contradicted) releases we got last year.
Didn't he fuel the rumours that he was in the running for 'Doctor Strange'?
Any reason for that? Don't know much about contract issues.
The similarities are scary
You are in denial
You are worse than a child.
Why don’t you just point out the faults in his reasoning instead of always just insulting those whose opinion differ from yours ( and rightfully so I might add) ?
Your inability to apply (or just comprehend) logical processes is embarrassing indeed, but I would never would call you on that if you weren’t so fond of insulting other people.
Didn't he buy a place in New York recently? He's been spending quite a bit of time there lately, as though it's going to be home base for something post-Bond. Purity perhaps?
It won't go to Hardy. He'd be roughly 43 by the time they finally got him cast, got the distribution deal out of the way, and acquired a whole new director/screenwriter for the gig. They'll likely go with someone younger to start, especially if they can't get back to releasing these every other year.
hadn't DC been spending lots of time in NY for a while? he likes the city obviously. easy to pop back to the UK. not too far from L.A. (not that L.A. is his cup of tea) and NY is awesome.
and isn't the actual film industry in NY now almost as big as it is in L.A.? as much actual filming goes on on the east coast now as West coast I think. plus NY has Broadway
Which assumes that not only would Nolan direct B26, but that he'd do a trilogy.
He did with Batman. I think people would expect it.
That might be so, but it doesn't change the fact that if Nolan got a hold of Bond, people would expect a trilogy after Batman. I don't think he would be allowed full creative control unless he was signed on for more than one.