It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I've never noticed that either. And now I have a damn good excuse to take a really good look, possibly involving the pause button.
Robert Davi plays a villain, pitted against a group of kids. One of the kids, Data (played by Jonathan Ke Quan, from Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom), likens himself to be James Bond. Data likes spy gadgets and running around playing the Bond theme. \
Four years later...Davi would be pitted against Bond.
Okay Mediocre: brozzer
Real Mediocre: Connery
Man Tits: Moore
Pussy prebuscent Boy Chest: Dalton
him after midnight !
I would imagine that's it Commander,its gone in later scenes.
In terms of real-life logic, I'm still skeptical about Q himself handling the identigraph. I'd figure an assistant familiar with the machine should do it, since Q probably has plenty of other things to oversee. I can't imagine him stopping his work coordinating the technicians and scientists when any agent comes asking for information. I also can't imagine the information contained in the machine being "for Q's eyes only", since his assistants should have access to the machine to work on it in the first place.
In fact, now that I think about it, MI6 should in fact have a department of records, separate from Q's lab, to retrieve such information. That's where the identigraph should be. Having said that, Q does state the identigraph is in an experimental phase, which could explain why it is housed in Q's lab at the time of FYEO.
But I'll admit all of this is speculation, and I'm being fastidious about this point.
In narrative/emotional terms though, considering he is a familiar character, it makes sense to have Q in the identigraph scene. It's the same as with Q traveling to Greece to brief Bond on St. Cyril, or M and the Minister of Defence traveling to Venice to see Drax's laboratotry.
We're in complete agreement here.
At 0:21 in this video, the ricochet of Sanchez's bullets sounds akin to the James Bond theme:
When Bond's sea plane lands on the beach. The left wing's flotation
Arm is missing. ( Damaged during filming, so removed ) I can't believe
I never noticed over hundreds of viewings !
Yes, it starts with the gag of Bond acting like a local, and I've heard some find the extinguisher kill campy (I don't). Some of the weak choreography, like the light and weak kick Sean gets on Robinson at the end, who acts like he got blown back by a fire hose, could create some moments of unnecessary comedy.
The backlighting is atrocious in both of Dalton's films. It bothers me a lot in TLD. But in LTK, it adds to the film's camp. If there is a Bond film that deserves a "cult following," it's LTK, which was considered "too violent," yet at the same time has so much unintended humor.
It is amazing how badly it struggles with tone. A real identity crisis, despite being one I can enjoy.
Always wondered why they wanted to do this with bullets richocheting. It does seem out of place for the otherwise stunning setpiece!
The back projection doesn't bother me. Its par for the course in Bond movies (and done much worse ie Bond on the snow bike in AVTAK for example!)
I certainly wouldn't be opposed. George and Diana looking cornily into a camera at close-up adds nothing to a great movie, and in fact bogs it down many times, especially during the action. The fine choreography of the action is not helped by the contrast of such bad effects that didn't need to be there in the first place.