It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Good comparison.That put a smile on my face. :)
I'm already excited to gripe about the gunbarrel, the new actor's gunbarrel pose, the color of the blood etc.
Yeah that's true mate. There does seem a general reluctance to have Bond women die on screen in recent years.
I still think Nomi would have been a more interesting character if she'd been a double agent and then you'd have Bond vs 007 in the final act of NTTD.
And yeah that could have been interesting for Nomi if done right. I’ve also thought how you could’ve made Logan Ash and Paloma one character, with Paloma being the double agent. Although, at the same time, both those characters were some of the best bits of No Time To Die so I’m also happy the way it was done.
My message is simply don’t be afraid of female villains EON. They’re great and have been missing from the series for too long.
Actually, Elektra King, Fiona Volpe, they're ahead of their time, showing independent women and just like any bad guys, they're killed, there's an equality.
Agreed, Paloma should've been a femme fatale, remove Logan Ash, I think that character mainly existed to kill Felix Leiter and have Bond his revenge moment (kinda forced).
And Nomi should've killed Paloma, if they want a more girl power moment, like have Nomi and Paloma in a shoot out and fight.
Very true at the rate that EON is proceeding. Which also makes all the hypothesizing about what direction to take Bond in irrelevant at this point. We have no idea what the culture will be like several years from now. Bond bends toward cultural trends as opposed to fan requests.
But they won't make that decision several years from now. The movie will be released several years from now. The decision about what direction to take Bond in is either being made now or will be made very soon.
Based on what? All the indications are that things haven't gotten rolling yet, I'd love to see some movement but it's just not happening at the moment it seems.
Yes, Amazon is like Disney buying Lucasfilm. They wanted a movie(s) as soon as possible to get a return on their investment. Amazon is going to want some type of progress in the next year or two from EON.
Who would've thought that restarting a franchise after blowing it all up actually isn't that easy, regardless of "continuity?"
But why would Amazon even want to wait that long. I agree with your theory that Amazon wants product but I don't understand why they would be resigned to waiting until EON is ready in a year or TWO.
'Blowing it up' made no difference, it would still have required a new direction and fresh thinking even if Spectre had been the last film.
Everyone assumes that Eon is the blockage, but we don't know if there's a reason that Amazon's takeover is stopping them from proceeding, potentially legal.
True.
A bloody piss poor placeholder. Even though I have Prime I have no interest in listening to the James Bond theme blaring over a reality streaming series.
LMAO
I'm hoping it would be good, and would cover all of the Bond films (we know some Bond projects are always leaving some Bond films and just picking out the iconic ones), hoping here, all of the Bond films would be covered.